[tor-talk] Flattor: A practical crowdfunded Flattr-like incentive scheme for Tor relays

2013-08-15 Thread George Kadianakis
==tldr (Too Long, Didn't Read) Where will Tor's bandwidth come from in 20 years? Will solo volunteers still exist, or will all the bandwidth come from Tor-friendly organizations? Tor incentive schemes are interesting. There are many proposed schemes but their crypto needs to be reviewed and lots

Re: [tor-talk] Flattor: A practical crowdfunded Flattr-like incentive scheme for Tor relays

2013-08-15 Thread adrelanos
Overall I like the idea, since it forces no one to participate. Nodes not interested in getting bitcoin donations, just don't get any. What about bridges? Any way to reward them as well? George Kadianakis: > As a simplified example, if the Tor network has 4 relays with > bandwidth contribution 0.

Re: [tor-talk] Flattor: A practical crowdfunded Flattr-like incentive scheme for Tor relays

2013-08-15 Thread Moritz Bartl
Hi, In some way, this is what we are planning to do with torservers.net, right? We take donations via any channel (including Bitcoin), and distribute them across all participating organizations based on, in the current model, advertised bandwidth and a country-specific factor. It is definitely mo

Re: [tor-talk] Flattor: A practical crowdfunded Flattr-like incentive scheme for Tor relays

2013-08-17 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:25:41 +0300 George Kadianakis wrote: > Currently, (we want to believe that) the Tor network is run by a bunch > of cypherpunks that are contributing bandwidth because they believe in > the Cause. > > If relay operators start getting money for their bandwidth, we might > en

Re: [tor-talk] Flattor: A practical crowdfunded Flattr-like incentive scheme for Tor relays

2013-08-17 Thread adrelanos
Roman Mamedov: > On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:25:41 +0300 > George Kadianakis wrote: > >> Currently, (we want to believe that) the Tor network is run by a bunch >> of cypherpunks that are contributing bandwidth because they believe in >> the Cause. >> >> If relay operators start getting money for their

Re: [tor-talk] Flattor: A practical crowdfunded Flattr-like incentive scheme for Tor relays

2013-08-17 Thread Moritz Bartl
Hi, On 17.08.2013 17:52, adrelanos wrote: >> I am sure there is a clever scientific term for the phenomenon that when you >> start paying *some* of your volunteers, others are gonna look and ask, "huh >> wait a second, we're all doing the same work, yet the other guy now gets >> paid, >> and I am

Re: [tor-talk] Flattor: A practical crowdfunded Flattr-like incentive scheme for Tor relays

2013-08-17 Thread Alex
It is indeed a tough problem, but I guess we have to try and see how it works out. In the end, it is/would be about covering parts of actual *costs* of infrastructure, not the time people volunteer to maintain it. It is already the case that (large) parts of the Tor network are funded by donations

Re: [tor-talk] Flattor: A practical crowdfunded Flattr-like incentive scheme for Tor relays

2013-08-17 Thread grarpamp
>> If relay operators start getting money for their bandwidth, we might >> end up with relay operators that are just in for the money. > > And you will also end up with having less operators who run relays just > because they want to support the idea of privacy/freedom/etc. Part of it is not direc

Re: [tor-talk] Flattor: A practical crowdfunded Flattr-like incentive scheme for Tor relays

2013-08-18 Thread George Kadianakis
Adrelanos said: > Overall I like the idea, since it forces no one to participate. Nodes > not interested in getting bitcoin donations, just don't get any. > > What about bridges? Any way to reward them as well? > > George Kadianakis: > > As a simplified example, if the Tor network has 4 relays w