It's my understanding they are segregating Tor and other
proxies under a non-ISO country, city, etc code. Besides not
being technically what GeoIP is supposed to do for locating
and breaking all of that context, it's showing arbitrary
'anti-spam/badness' mindset.
Perhaps GeoIP/Maxmind/etc are folk
On 2/11/13 7:33 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> It's my understanding they are segregating Tor and other
> proxies under a non-ISO country, city, etc code. Besides not
> being technically what GeoIP is supposed to do for locating
> and breaking all of that context, it's showing arbitrary
> 'anti-spam/badness
>> least cause them to distribute a version of their datasets
>> that retain the original locations.
>
> I asked their (first-level) support a few months ago, and they said
> they're considering providing data sets without A1 codes some time this
> year.
Any wiki'ers on the list want to wiki thing
On 11.02.2013 23:28, grarpamp wrote:
> Years ago I thought there were some crowdsourced IP location
> projects. While not being commercial where ISP's would
> perhaps be more inclined to input their provisioning tables, they
> covered userland's knowledge and self-submittals pretty good.
> These pr
On 2/11/13 11:28 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>>> least cause them to distribute a version of their datasets
>>> that retain the original locations.
>>
>> I asked their (first-level) support a few months ago, and they said
>> they're considering providing data sets without A1 codes some time this
>> year.
>
