-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/03/2014 05:12 PM, grarpamp wrote:
High-latency web browsing is actually a great use case and could
benefit from the extra security.
Apps like Pocket (http://getpocket.com/) work as a read it
later queue, downloading things for offline
Maybe one day, something like Peersm combined with [1] in order to
follow/or use [2] and [3] (don't focus on google developing this here,
these concepts are the only way to really secure a web page)
Basically you fetch the web page with something like Peersm, then
retarget it in a sandboxed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/02/2014 04:18 PM, Helder Ribeiro wrote:
Apps like Pocket (http://getpocket.com/) work as a read it later
queue, downloading things for offline reading. While you're reading
an offline article, you can also follow links and click to add
The Doctor writes:
On 07/02/2014 04:18 PM, Helder Ribeiro wrote:
Apps like Pocket (http://getpocket.com/) work as a read it later
queue, downloading things for offline reading. While you're reading
an offline article, you can also follow links and click to add them
to your queue.
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Seth David Schoen sch...@eff.org wrote:
snip
Then a question is whether users would want to use a service that takes,
say, several hours to act on or answer their queries (and whether the
amount of padding data required to thwart end-to-end traffic analysis
is
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Seth David Schoen sch...@eff.org wrote:
...
I wonder if there's a way to retrofit high-latency hidden services
onto Tor -- much as Pond does, but for applications other than Pond's
messaging application.
i know that one mechanism i have used to some limited
Andreas Krey writes:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:50:29 +, Tor Talker wrote:
...
enough to do it securely enough. Also, hidden services are far more
vulnerable than Tor users, simply because they serve stuff.
...
What sort of vulnerabilities would you expect to see?
Problem: Your
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Seth David Schoen sch...@eff.org wrote:
I wonder if there's a way to retrofit high-latency hidden services
onto Tor -- much as Pond does, but for applications other than Pond's
messaging application.
[...]
Then a question is whether users would want to use a
