Re: [tor-talk] Lets Encrypt compared to self-signed certs

2016-02-29 Thread Seth David Schoen
ban...@openmailbox.org writes: > Hi David. Thanks for chiming in. Please add a feature for pinning at > the key level as IMO it provides the best protection. We don't have any tools for pinning at all but you can read people's tips about it on the Let's Encrypt community forum. > Will the logs p

Re: [tor-talk] Lets Encrypt compared to self-signed certs

2016-02-29 Thread bancfc
Hi David. Thanks for chiming in. Please add a feature for pinning at the key level as IMO it provides the best protection. Will the logs provide users/site owners with a way to independently check if coercion has happened? Would systems like Cothority help Lets Encrypt users notice cert issu

Re: [tor-talk] Lets Encrypt compared to self-signed certs

2016-02-29 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
> We don't know how large the risk of legally-compelled misissuance is, but we have lots of lawyers who would be excited to fight very hard against it.  I think that makes us a less attractive target than other CAs that might not find it as objectionable or have as many lawyers standing by to chall

Re: [tor-talk] Lets Encrypt compared to self-signed certs

2016-02-29 Thread Seth David Schoen
ban...@openmailbox.org writes: > How secure is Lets Encrypt compared to a pinned self signed cert? > Can Lets Encrypt be subverted by NSLs? You can use pinning with Let's Encrypt certs too. The default client behavior changes the subject key on every renewal, but I can add a feature to keep the

[tor-talk] Lets Encrypt compared to self-signed certs

2016-02-29 Thread bancfc
How secure is Lets Encrypt compared to a pinned self signed cert? Can Lets Encrypt be subverted by NSLs? -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk