Hi,
Tor switches over to ECC what's a reasonable step.
I'm unable to find the blog post (or maybe it was an official comment on
the blog) [With DDG and StartPage] where someone said that if the NIST
(I guess) is not lying ECC is safe.
Is the ECC used by Tor in some way certified by NIST?
Are ot
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Sebastian G.
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tor switches over to ECC what's a reasonable step.
>
> I'm unable to find the blog post (or maybe it was an official comment on
> the blog) [With DDG and StartPage] where someone said that if the NIST
> (I guess) is not lying ECC is sa
On 2013-09-07 10:02, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> The elephant in the room here is TLS itself. Frankly, I'm starting to
> think we should cut the Gordian Knot here and start a little
> independent protocol group of our own if the TLS working group can't
> get its act together and have one really good c
07.09.2013 19:02, Nick Mathewson:
Do not dare to reply again before your weekend is over. Probably don't
even read it.
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Sebastian G.
> wrote:
>>
>> Tor switches over to ECC what's a reasonable step.
>>
>> I'm unable to find the blog post (or maybe it was an offi
Bruce Schneier recommends *not* to use ECC. It is safe to assume he
knows what he says.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
At 11:08 PM 9/7/2013 +, you wrote:
>Bruce Schneier recommends *not* to use ECC. It is safe to assume he
>knows what he says.
But, but, isn't Schneier a crazy conspiracy theorist?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsusbscribe or change other settings go t
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:08 PM, anonymous coward
wrote:
> Bruce Schneier recommends *not* to use ECC. It is safe to assume he
> knows what he says.
I believe Schneier was being careless there. The ECC parameter sets
commonly used on the internet (the NIST P-xxxr ones) were chosen using
a publish
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:08 PM, anonymous coward
> wrote:
>> Bruce Schneier recommends *not* to use ECC. It is safe to assume he
>> knows what he says.
>
> I believe Schneier was being careless there. The ECC parameter sets
> commonly used
