Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

2016-05-12 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On 2/7/16, grarpamp wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Tom A. wrote: >> Yes take care and look yourself or believe so called experts or >> multiplicators. > > Fine example of the classic passive shilling for GoldBug / BitMail, etc. > >> I

Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

2016-05-12 Thread Yuri
On 01/29/2016 05:05, anonymous coward wrote: what do you think about Bitmessage? Could it be, Bitmessage gives you some anonymity even without using TOR due to the way it works? Couldn´t TOR be extended in a way to work like Bitmessage? I guess BM is like a mesh or P2P thing, wouldn´t adding

Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

2016-02-06 Thread grarpamp
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Tom A. wrote: > Yes take care and look yourself or believe so called experts or > multiplicators. Fine example of the classic passive shilling for GoldBug / BitMail, etc. > I agree that all closed source crypto is obsolete. Yeah, so

Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

2016-01-30 Thread Tom A.
Anthony, you describe BitMail - http://bitmail.sf.net not, BitMessage, please dont mix it up! Regards Tom On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Anthony Papillion wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 01/29/2016 07:05 AM, anonymous coward wrote: >

Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

2016-01-30 Thread Tom A.
Yes take care and look yourself or believe so called experts or multiplicators. I agree that all closed source crypto is obsolete. Regards Tom Am 30.01.2016 11:47 schrieb "Jeremy Rand" : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 01/30/2016 04:30 AM, Anthony

Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

2016-01-30 Thread Anthony Papillion
Thanks Tom but I want even aware that Bitmail existed lol. I think these are problems I've seen talked about around Bitmessage. For example, someone can observe you connect to peers and know you're transmitting data through them. But maybe not to whom or what your saying. Am I wrong? If I

Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

2016-01-30 Thread Jeremy Rand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/30/2016 04:30 AM, Anthony Papillion wrote: > Thanks Tom but I want even aware that Bitmail existed lol. I think > these are problems I've seen talked about around Bitmessage. For > example, someone can observe you connect to peers and know

[tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

2016-01-29 Thread anonymous coward
Good day (again), what do you think about Bitmessage? Could it be, Bitmessage gives you some anonymity even without using TOR due to the way it works? Couldn´t TOR be extended in a way to work like Bitmessage? I guess BM is like a mesh or P2P thing, wouldn´t adding such a technology enhance TOR?

Re: [tor-talk] OT: Bitmessage

2016-01-29 Thread Anthony Papillion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/29/2016 07:05 AM, anonymous coward wrote: > Good day (again), > > what do you think about Bitmessage? Could it be, Bitmessage gives > you some anonymity even without using TOR due to the way it works? > > Couldn´t TOR be extended in a way to