Thus spake anonym (ano...@lavabit.com):
12/04/11 15:07, Mike Perry:
If we migrate to shipping TBB, can we go on maintaining our Tails
specific Firefox configuration delta as described above? Will the
TBB's Firefox use the standard ways to fetch system-wide
configuration? (I guess this
On 21 April 2011 17:50, Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote:
On 4/21/2011 1:22 PM, Kraktus wrote:
Well, if I had an 8-core machine with 4+GB RAM, or even a single-core
machine with over 1 GHz and at least 1GB RAM, I'd probably have four
browser profiles for Firefox alone: ...
However,
On 4/22/2011 6:32 AM, Kraktus wrote:
If I had a nice high CPU high RAM machine, you mean?
...I'm actually using a similar browser that's
close enough that it can still use Firefox 4 add-ons. Also, JonDoFox
makes running multiple instances of my non-Firefox quite easy: there's
a menu option for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/21/2011 05:50 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Why would you want to run several instances of Firefox -
SIMULTANEOUSLY? When I said it was easy to install multiple versions,
So the user could have a 'mundane' browser for day to day stuff and a
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:53:19 -0400
The Doctor dr...@virtadpt.net wrote:
Why would you want to run several instances of Firefox -
SIMULTANEOUSLY? When I said it was easy to install multiple
versions,
Perhaps I'm confused over the details, but I do this daily. I use TBB
for my
Well, if I had an 8-core machine with 4+GB RAM, or even a single-core
machine with over 1 GHz and at least 1GB RAM, I'd probably have four
browser profiles for Firefox alone: one for Tor (Torbutton or whatever
you guys decide to use, plus Noscript, AdBlockPlus, Cookie Monster,
etc.), one for JonDo
On 4/21/2011 1:22 PM, Kraktus wrote:
Well, if I had an 8-core machine with 4+GB RAM, or even a single-core
machine with over 1 GHz and at least 1GB RAM, I'd probably have four
browser profiles for Firefox alone: ...
However, seeing has how my computer is single core, less than 1 GHz,
and has
On 12.04.2011 16:59, Milton Scritsmier wrote:
After reading most of the replies to this topic, I'm not sure the
average user has weighed in. [...]
Thank you. This list is dominated, if not completely focused, on
development and security research. The Torproject as a whole has for the
last 10
* Jérémy Bobbio lu...@debian.org [2011:04:14 08:29 +0200]:
Here is a possible solution that quickly came to me, but I have no real
clue on how much work it would need (and if every party involved would
accept it):
1. Apply specific Tor patches against Firefox 4 in Debian iceweasel
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 04:33:08PM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
I now no longer believe even this much. I think we should completely
do away with the toggle model, as well as the entire idea of Torbutton
as a separate piece of user-facing software, and rely solely on the
Tor Browser Bundles,
Thus spake Jérémy Bobbio (lu...@debian.org):
How does that relate to Torbutton and Tor Browser Bundle?
Well, as already pointed out by intrigeri, Debian has gone a great
length to avoid embedded code copies in its source packages. Firefox
security record is far from perfect, and I see no
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:29:36AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Last comment: we should all continue to stress out that Internet is
not only made of web sites. If Internet was only about web sites, Tor
would had a harder time happening: this new protocol was free to run
through the
Thus spake Anders Andersson (pipat...@gmail.com):
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Mike Perry mikepe...@fscked.org wrote:
(blah blah)
Thus, I can only agree to 100% that this is a good idea.
The only problem I can come up with at 2 AM is that maintaining a
separate firefox can be a
Thus spake Jim (jimmy...@copper.net):
Mike Perry wrote:
So can anyone bring up any specific issues that may be caused by the
change?
We are collecting these issues as child tickets of this bug:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2880
As an aside, we also are collecting a
Hi,
Being relying myself on Firefox profiles / virtual machines rather
than the toggle thing, I'd personally be happy to see it go away.
Let me put my Tails developer hat on. Done. Let's go.
Mike Perry wrote (11 Apr 2011 23:33:08 GMT) :
The reason I am discussing this in so much detail here is
The reason I am discussing this in so much detail here is because I
believe there is a chance that there are users out there who rely on
the toggle model and/or their OS Firefox build, and may be confused or
enraged by the new model. I'm asking this list to get an idea of how
many of
Thus spake intrigeri (intrig...@boum.org):
Mike Perry wrote (11 Apr 2011 23:33:08 GMT) :
So can anyone bring up any specific issues that may be caused by the
change?
Context: Tails currently ships Debian's Iceweasel (Firefox renamed for
trademark reasons) and Torbutton. We don't care for
On 4/11/2011 5:33 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
I think the average user is horribly confused by both the toggle model
and the need to install additional software into Firefox (or
conversely, the need to *also* install Tor software onto their
computers after they install Torbutton). I also think that
Mike Perry wrote:
I think we should completely
do away with the toggle model, as well as the entire idea of Torbutton
as a separate piece of user-facing software, and rely solely on the
Tor Browser Bundles, except perhaps with the addition of standalone
Tor+Vidalia binaries for use by experts
On 12.04.2011 04:11, Jim wrote:
Mike Perry wrote:
I think we should completely
do away with the toggle model, as well as the entire idea of Torbutton
as a separate piece of user-facing software, and rely solely on the
Tor Browser Bundles, except perhaps with the addition of standalone
20 matches
Mail list logo
