On Nov 14, 2011, at 3:45 AM, Jim wrote:
> Since I don't run Microsoft software I have not paid a great deal of
> attention to the downloads the Tor Project offers for it. So I went and
> took a look at your download pages to see what Anon Mus was talking
> about. I see that for the bundles, you
Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On 11/13/2011 03:15 PM, Anon Mus wrote:
>> Sebastian Hahn wrote:
>>> I'll pretend you didn't insult me and the rest of the Tor dev team, and
>>> try and get your question answered. I've snipped the useless
>>> allegations.
>>>
>>>
>> I made no allegations WHAT SO EVER, I
On 11/13/2011 03:15 PM, Anon Mus wrote:
> Sebastian Hahn wrote:
>> I'll pretend you didn't insult me and the rest of the Tor dev team, and
>> try and get your question answered. I've snipped the useless
>> allegations.
>>
>>
>
> I made no allegations WHAT SO EVER, I asked questions, that was al
Sebastian Hahn wrote:
I'll pretend you didn't insult me and the rest of the Tor dev team, and
try and get your question answered. I've snipped the useless
allegations.
I made no allegations WHAT SO EVER, I asked questions, that was all. I
seem to have hit a raw nerve.
On Nov 12, 2011, a
On 11/12/2011 01:11 PM, Julian Yon wrote:
Nobody's going to keep an old, unsupported system up and running, at
personal expense, just to appease a person who is rude to them.
It's also a bad idea from a security perspective. You could easily be
doing them more harm than good.
Win2k had a lo
On 12/11/11 11:52, Anon Mus wrote:
> Why no replies to genuine and relevant questions? The silence makes the
> Tor dev team appear to have something to hide.
Do you go round making accusations against everybody who gives you
something for free? If this was my project I'd be telling you where to
sh
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
> I'll pretend you didn't insult me and the rest of the Tor dev team, and
> try and get your question answered. I've snipped the useless
> allegations.
>
> On Nov 12, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Anon Mus wrote:
>> Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>>> On 11/10/20
I'll pretend you didn't insult me and the rest of the Tor dev team, and
try and get your question answered. I've snipped the useless
allegations.
On Nov 12, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Anon Mus wrote:
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> On 11/10/2011 02:39 AM, Anon Mus wrote:
>>> I got a message to upgrade my Tor
Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
On 11/10/2011 02:39 AM, Anon Mus wrote:
I got a message to upgrade my Tor version..
Nov 10 10:20:45.953 [Warning] Please upgrade! This version of Tor
(0.2.1.30) is obsolete, according to the directory authorities.
Recommended versions are: 0.2.1.31,0.2.2.34,0.2.3.6-alp
On 11/10/2011 02:39 AM, Anon Mus wrote:
> I got a message to upgrade my Tor version..
>
> Nov 10 10:20:45.953 [Warning] Please upgrade! This version of Tor
> (0.2.1.30) is obsolete, according to the directory authorities.
> Recommended versions are: 0.2.1.31,0.2.2.34,0.2.3.6-alpha,0.2.3.7-alpha
>
From:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:39:38AM +, my.green.lant...@googlemail.com
> wrote 2.0K
> bytes in 50
> lines about: : Nov 10 10:17:10.093 [Warning] Warning from libevent:
> evsig_init:
> : socketpair: Cannot assign requested address [WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL ]
>
> Do you have antivirus or a fi
and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:39:38AM +, my.green.lant...@googlemail.com wrote
2.0K bytes in 50 lines about:
: Nov 10 10:17:10.093 [Warning] Warning from libevent: evsig_init:
: socketpair: Cannot assign requested address [WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL ]
Do you have antivirus o
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:39:38AM +, my.green.lant...@googlemail.com wrote
2.0K bytes in 50 lines about:
: Nov 10 10:17:10.093 [Warning] Warning from libevent: evsig_init:
: socketpair: Cannot assign requested address [WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL ]
Do you have antivirus or a firewall blocking localhost
Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2011-11-10 11:39 , Anon Mus wrote:
[..]
Nov 10 10:17:10.093 [Warning] Warning from libevent: evsig_init:
socketpair: Cannot assign requested address [WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL ]
This is the important part, it states that the address is not available.
Did your properly sh
On 2011-11-10 13:13 , Anon Mus wrote:
[..]
> I do have a socks listen address specified
>
> SocksListenAddress 127.0.0.1
Unless a SOCKS capable program is listening there already, it should not
be an issue.
See 'netstat -an' in a command prompt to check if this is the case or not.
Greets,
Jero
Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2011-11-10 11:39 , Anon Mus wrote:
[..]
Nov 10 10:17:10.093 [Warning] Warning from libevent: evsig_init:
socketpair: Cannot assign requested address [WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL ]
This is the important part, it states that the address is not available.
Did your properly sh
On 2011-11-10 11:39 , Anon Mus wrote:
[..]
> Nov 10 10:17:10.093 [Warning] Warning from libevent: evsig_init:
> socketpair: Cannot assign requested address [WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL ]
This is the important part, it states that the address is not available.
Did your properly shutdown the old version?
And/
I got a message to upgrade my Tor version..
Nov 10 10:20:45.953 [Warning] Please upgrade! This version of Tor
(0.2.1.30) is obsolete, according to the directory authorities.
Recommended versions are: 0.2.1.31,0.2.2.34,0.2.3.6-alpha,0.2.3.7-alpha
But (as before) the latest versions of the expe
18 matches
Mail list logo
