adrelanos:
Since very few people shared my opinion
Not so few people share your opinion, Adrelanos :)
I think that too much care about the user is underestimating the user.
Any adequate user at first MUST NOT to trust any of the software,
including Tor.
The user must decide how to use this
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:34:07 +, Van Gegel wrote:
...
The user must decide how to use this software on the basis of the source
code examination and own tests,
How do you expect the average GFW-encumbered chinese or journalist in
syria to examine the code of tor, let alone the browser or the
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:17:31AM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
I'd love to see ways we can be more permissive without abandoning the
trademark entirely. I'd been under the impression that we were doing
pretty good. We seem to be at least as open as with our trademark as
Debian, for example.
Hi!
Thank you Nick for your lengthy answer!
I am not going to reply with a long answer, because you considered my
points and answered.
I wasn't totally clear, but the basic message was correctly understood.
Since very few people shared my opinion, and this thread generally
received little
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:21 AM, adrelanos adrela...@riseup.net wrote:
These pages are confusing:
http://www.torproject.org/docs/trademark-faq.html.en
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/LikelyTMViolators
Please re-consider your standpoint.
It's not uncommon to include a part of
It's sad, that a project encouraging free speech has a restrictive
trademark policy.
I must admit to laughing a bit at that (given TPB and the internet as a
whole are still proving classes of IP rights rather silly) and the enforcement
possibilities against any purely darknet examples, no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I see a couple of problems with the LikelyTMViolators list.
1. Such a list puts projects such as tormail, torfone, torchat and
torguard in the same box as the fakers producing modified harmful
binary distributions of torproject.org software such as
These pages are confusing:
http://www.torproject.org/docs/trademark-faq.html.en
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/LikelyTMViolators
Please re-consider your standpoint.
It's not uncommon to include a part of the name of the original project,
into the name of the derivate/based/related
