On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:12 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:
... the very design trade offs they make to
support larger numbers of contains per host directly reduce the
networking performance and capacity of any singular container/vm.
note that design trade-offs in favor of speed also
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:12, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Martin Fick mogul...@yahoo.com wrote:
...
Both of your preferred solutions will have much
higher performance overheads than any container
like solution (OpenVz, Vserver, lxc...).
What virtual private server software do you know works well--or
badly--with running a Tor server?
I want to buy cheap VPS's devoted exclusively to running Tor servers.
The VPS's often limit traffic to, say, 200GB. I see companies offering Xen,
OpenVZ, VMware, Virtuozzo, and many
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Rhona Mahony rmah...@stanford.edu wrote:
What virtual private server software do you know works well--or
badly--with running a Tor server?
Xen, VMWare work best in bridged mode; alas most providers don't
configure them this way.
OpenVZ is worthless from a
I run a (non-exit) relay on a 512MB linode instance
(http://www.linode.com). That costs $20/m with 200GB/m and uses Xen.
Performance has been fine, but you can burn through 200GB pretty
quickly (incoming and outgoing traffic both count).
I am planning on shutting down this relay and donating the
--- On Fri, 8/26/11, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:
Rhona Mahony rmah...@stanford.edu
wrote:
What virtual private server software do you
know works well--or
badly--with running a Tor server?
Xen, VMWare work best in bridged mode; alas most providers
don't
configure them this
