-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Try squid, privoxy and polipo.
On 09. Juni 2014 21:18:04 MESZ, Antonio Z wrote:
>I understand that it is not necessary, but I believe that making your
>own ad blocking software would bring more people to tor. It does not
>even have to come with the
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Antonio Z wrote:
> I understand that it is not necessary, but I believe that making your
> own ad blocking software would bring more people to tor. It does not
> even have to come with the bundle. It could just be an optional add on
> called, Tor Ad blocker.
>
> Ina
I did not think that Adblock was trustable considering how an
extension can bypass Tor.
On 6/10/14, Anders Andersson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Antonio Z wrote:
>> I understand that it is not necessary, but I believe that making your
>> own ad blocking software would bring more peo
On 6/10/2014 2:27 PM, Antonio Z wrote:
I did not think that Adblock was trustable considering how an
extension can bypass Tor.
Good question. I've never sniffed ABP activities to see what it does
when installed in TBB. From memory, it shouldn't be phoning home,
except to get updates. Don't
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:49:01 +0200
Anders Andersson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Antonio Z wrote:
> > I understand that it is not necessary, but I believe that making your
> > own ad blocking software would bring more people to tor. It does not
> > even have to come with the bundle.
On 06/10/2014 10:55 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:49:01 +0200
> Anders Andersson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Antonio Z wrote:
>>> I understand that it is not necessary, but I believe that making your
>>> own ad blocking software would bring more people to tor.
I agree with Mirmir, but I would still be more comfortable if it was
made by Tor.
On 6/11/14, Mirimir wrote:
> On 06/10/2014 10:55 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:49:01 +0200
>> Anders Andersson wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Antonio Z
>>> wrote:
I underst
On 6/11/2014 12:50 AM, Mirimir wrote:
Yes indeed. So why doesn't TBB include AdBlock? In my experience,
unlike NoScript, AdBlock Plus rarely breaks sites. Reductions in site
loading time are dramatic. And then there's the privacy benefit.
The reason given in the past by Tor Project leaders, was
On 06/11/2014 11:42 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 6/11/2014 12:50 AM, Mirimir wrote:
>> Yes indeed. So why doesn't TBB include AdBlock? In my experience,
>> unlike NoScript, AdBlock Plus rarely breaks sites. Reductions in site
>> loading time are dramatic. And then there's the privacy benefit.
> The
