It was not a criticism, I would have done exactly the same thing :-) . I
cannot see myself another way to proceed.
I was just curious to know if someone has an idea of the Torque fan base.
Il 01/10/2010 9.26, Thomas Fischer ha scritto:
3) keep the larger possible user base: in this case devs
Do you know how many people are subscribed to the user list?
Il 30/09/2010 20.57, Thomas Fischer ha scritto:
>
>
>> 3) keep the larger possible user base: in this case devs should ask the
>> community and then see if the requests for asked dbs are satisfiable
>> with the available manpower
Since I have not been able to participate in the dev process I will stay
agnostic with respect to an alpha1 release. But.
Il 26/09/2010 19.49, Thomas Fischer ha scritto:
> If we do this, we still need to think about a set of supported databases.
> As I have written before, I'd prefer that we o
, 27 Mar 2010 16:00:46 -0700
Mittente: Henning Schmiedehausen
A: Ivano Luberti
Hi,
I had to cut the talk for time reasons and removed the least popular
choice. No other reason.
-h
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:17, Ivano Luberti wrote:
> Hello I'm a user of Apache Torque an
Il 15/03/2010 9.01, Thomas Fischer ha scritto:
> If you want to come up with a suggestion, please go ahead
>
>Thomas
>
This is only a draft and made in plain text. To have a real
presentation of Torque structured like this the items in the
Characteristics section should be expanded by p
I think we should take advantage of the fact we are writing an hypeterxt.
We should have an elevator pitch and use links in his keywords to
forward the reader to techinical explanation.
Even better to forward the reader to a FAQ dedicated to this kind of
matters.
In this way we have a short elevato
I second the fact that the term Object Relational Mapper should appear
mainylfor SEO reasons.
I disagree in part on the advantages/disatvantages considertations.
I think that we should have a separate section (Why Torque?) with the
items listed down here.
It would be also great to have a (of course
Thomas Fischer ha scritto:
>> In any case I would move the releseases section in the Overview page
>> up, right under the What is Torque section.
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this.
If you look at the home page of the new site (the one you can reach also
using the Torque4->Overview it
Thomas Fischer ha scritto:
>
>> As I already mentioned, my experience says this is a quite important
>> module, for me it has been fundamental.
>> I can sure try to find some time to contribute to this even if not
>> before one month from now.
>> Moreover I would need some start up tutorial from
There are many things I don't know enough to even make question but on
other I can ask:
Thomas Fischer ha scritto:
>
>> - something needs to be done about the ant tasks that were in 3.3. but
>>
> are
>
>> not yet present in 4.0.
>>
there are others than jdbc2xml ?
>> - There might b
Sorry to answer only now tho this.
Thomas Fischer ha scritto:
> The thing which we should decide next is what do we do with the generator
> features which do not have to do anything with code generation (like
> jdbc2xml).
As I already mentioned, my experience says this is a quite important
module,
I keep on browsing the site.
Another thing that lacks in the home page is an explanation of the main
differences between 3.3 and for and the link to a tutorial for porting
3.3 applications to 4.
--
==
dott. Ivano Mario Luberti
Archimede Informatica
Thomas Vandahl ha scritto:
>
>> - The external-schema support is missing, I hope I get at it in the near
>> future. However, I'm curious to know what it is good for. Does anybody
>> have a use case ?
>>
>
> I haven't used this yet, so this is just my understanding what it was
> meant for. L
Thomas, not sure what the final decision is.
In any case I would move the releseases section in the Overview page
up, right under the What is Torque section.
Then in the main component I would still cite village with a note about
is demotion in Torque 4.
In the maven-plugin section a sohort text a
Ok, Gregg I will read your links...of course I will need some time
Some comments in line
Greg Monroe ha scritto:
>
>
> I agree TF here. It's hard and will always be wrong for someone or some
> version of SQL. Remember Torque has to work across all major DB server.
> But, as TF said, it's a g
I'm guessing if this difference in view come from different experience
or is a matter of skills.
Other comments follow:
Thomas Fischer ha scritto:
>
> Forgive me, but personally I think reverse engineering from the database is
> an inherent pain. You tend to loose important information, e.g.fore
Hi, as suggested by Thomas I bring this discussion to the dev list.
I'm a newbie so please forgive some clueless observation.
Thomas Fischer ha scritto:
> Ivano ha scritto:
>> ...
>> Unfortunately I'm not familiar with Maven at all but I suspect it is not
>> mandatory to participate in development
Hello, I'm new to the dev list, so I hope I'm not going to say something
that doesn't make sense.
For what I read the Torque 4 web site already exists and has only to be
deployed (as Thomas knows I don't know Maven: I only can guess is an
evolution of ant).
If I well understand Torque 4 is quite a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667660#action_12667660
]
iluber edited comment on TORQUE-39 at 1/27/09 4:45 AM:
--
Thomas,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667660#action_12667660
]
ivano luberti commented on TORQUE-39:
-
Thomas, you just asked me to create her
20 matches
Mail list logo
