Il 15/03/2010 9.01, Thomas Fischer ha scritto:
> If you want to come up with a suggestion, please go ahead
>
>Thomas
>
This is only a draft and made in plain text. To have a real
presentation of Torque structured like this the items in the
Characteristics section should be expanded by p
If you want to come up with a suggestion, please go ahead
Thomas
> I think we should take advantage of the fact we are writing an hypeterxt.
> We should have an elevator pitch and use links in his keywords to
> forward the reader to techinical explanation.
> Even better to forward the reader to
+1, very nice.
Do you want to replace the current text on the 3.3 and 4.0 website with
it ? The 4.0 site deployment description at
http://db.apache.org/torque/releases/torque-4.0/developer-info/site-edit-deploy.html
should be up do date.
Thomas
> OK, this isn't an elevator pitch anymore...
On 12.03.10 00:13, Greg Monroe wrote:
> Some of Torque's key features are:
[...]
+1 I like this statement.
Bye, Thomas.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscr...@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-h
I think we should take advantage of the fact we are writing an hypeterxt.
We should have an elevator pitch and use links in his keywords to
forward the reader to techinical explanation.
Even better to forward the reader to a FAQ dedicated to this kind of
matters.
In this way we have a short elevato
OK, this isn't an elevator pitch anymore... but valuable description
text. FYI - I debated using Object-Relational mapper... but at work
our "pitches" try to avoid concepts that need a lot of explanation to
non-techies. should have considered the audience here...lol
Anyway, here's a version that
graphical interface.
/Ludwig
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Vandahl [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: den 10 mars 2010 19:41
To: Apache Torque Developers List
Subject: Re: What is Torque?
Ludwig Magnusson wrote:
> Otherwise I don't really like the word simple. Too many projects
Ludwig Magnusson wrote:
> Otherwise I don't really like the word simple. Too many projects use this
> word to describe them, from small libraries to extensive frameworks that
> rarely are simple to understand.
Torque *is* simple, trust me. Almost everything else is much more
complicated.
Bye, Th
Ivano Luberti wrote:
> It would be also great to have a (of course biased) comparison matrix.
> Do you know of a good comparison matrix of ORM tools?
Henning presented an overview on Apache O/R-mappers at ApacheCon EU 2006
in Dublin. The script is at
http://henning.schmiedehausen.org/or-mappers/Ap
I second the fact that the term Object Relational Mapper should appear
mainylfor SEO reasons.
I disagree in part on the advantages/disatvantages considertations.
I think that we should have a separate section (Why Torque?) with the
items listed down here.
It would be also great to have a (of course
opers List
Subject: RE: What is Torque?
In my opinion, the text above is quite good already. However, my personal
focus would be more on what distinguishes Torque from other OR mappers.
- extensible (hooks are provided for custom behavioor, e.g. modifying the
templates, change behaviour of gene
> I think Torque would benefit from us defining such a statement to
> help frame what Torque
> 4.0 is working towards.
>
> That said, my personal elevator speech for Torque is:
>
> Torque is designed to simplify using SQL data in Java
> applications across all the common SQL
> database serv
Greg Monroe wrote:
> That said, my personal elevator speech for Torque is:
>
> Torque is designed to simplify using SQL data in Java applications across
> all the common SQL
> database servers. It allows for rapid development, while supporting the
> full application life
> cycle.
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
