mpoeschl2003/10/31 10:31:38
Modified:.project.xml
xdocschanges.xml
src/java/org/apache/torque Torque.java
Log:
Remove support for stratum lifecycle interfaces.
Revision ChangesPath
1.110 +0 -5 db-torque/project.xml
I
dlr 2003/07/02 15:19:08
Modified:src/java/org/apache/torque Torque.java
Log:
* src/java/org/apache/torque/Torque.java
Documentation updates per dev list buzz.
Revision ChangesPath
1.88 +8 -4 db-torque/src/java/org/apache/torque/Torque.java
Index: To
Fine with me. +1 then
Regards
Henning
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 00:51, Daniel Rall wrote:
> "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >The addition of TorqueSingleton doesn't get us out of this situation
>
"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >The addition of TorqueSingleton doesn't get us out of this situation
> >by any chance, does it?
>
> That was the whole idea. The Singleton helped me to get rid of all the
> static references in
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>The addition of TorqueSingleton doesn't get us out of this situation
>by any chance, does it?
That was the whole idea. The Singleton helped me to get rid of all the
static references in Torque itself. For me (and at least for Martin,
too) it works fine now
"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >The new getMapBuilders() method isn't absolutely thread safe. Is it
> >used in a thread-safe context, e.g. is the caller synchronized? If
> >not, one possibility would be to dump the lazy init
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>The new getMapBuilders() method isn't absolutely thread safe. Is it
>used in a thread-safe context, e.g. is the caller synchronized? If
>not, one possibility would be to dump the lazy initialization and
>create the sync'd List in the static field declarat
The new getMapBuilders() method isn't absolutely thread safe. Is it
used in a thread-safe context, e.g. is the caller synchronized? If
not, one possibility would be to dump the lazy initialization and
create the sync'd List in the static field declaration.
- Dan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> he
mpoeschl2003/06/20 12:04:30
Modified:src/java/org/apache/torque Torque.java
Log:
add note about stratum deprecation
Revision ChangesPath
1.85 +5 -1 db-torque/src/java/org/apache/torque/Torque.java
Index: Torque.java
===
henning 2003/06/20 09:59:09
Modified:src/java/org/apache/torque Torque.java
Log:
move access to mapBuilders to an accessor so it will never be null. The
change to a static init method died with Turbine Component Service.
Revision ChangesPath
1.84 +15 -8 db-torq
henning 2003/06/19 17:38:41
Modified:src/java/org/apache/torque Torque.java
Log:
Due to some fun with the class loader, the mapBuilders must be set
in a static initializer and not directly at variable declaration time.
Without this change, Torque won't come up as an Avalon Compon
mpoeschl2003/03/21 12:30:31
Modified:src/java/org/apache/torque Torque.java
Log:
replace deprecated Logger.getCurrentCategories()
Revision ChangesPath
1.80 +6 -2 db-torque/src/java/org/apache/torque/Torque.java
Index: Torque.java
=
12 matches
Mail list logo