ns(). This method is implemented in BaseCcsMember.
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: brycenesbitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. August 2007 10:14
> An: torque-user@db.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: foreign-key generation maps NumberKey to
> int, and
Each coupon is owned by one member.
A member may have any number of coupons.
SQL has no trouble setting up such a relationship without a third table. Do
I need the third table to satisfy Torque?
Thoralf Rickert wrote:
>
> Ah, okay, a coupon has only one member. Is it possible to have a member
AW: foreign-key generation maps NumberKey to
> int, and code fails to compile
>
>
>
> Hmm, ok. But if I flip it around like that, I don't get a
> BaseCcsMemberPeer.doSelectJoinCcsCoupon().
>
>
> required="true" type="I
Hmm, ok. But if I flip it around like that, I don't get a
BaseCcsMemberPeer.doSelectJoinCcsCoupon().
How can I get a BaseCcsMemberPeer.doSelectJoinCcsCoupon(), which will do
essentially:
S
Hi!
I'm not sure if I understand you problem. But does it make sense to declare a
foreign key for primary key in the same table? Normally you declare the foreign
key in COUPON and make a reference to MEMBER. Maybe Torque doesn't "like" this
double "key-definition" in MEMBER. But I'm not sure...
