Re: build.txt

I did a followup in r29578 to update the 'cross' option to only support ARM64. I hope I got it right. I suppose it would be possible to crosscompile for x86/x64 on ARM-VS, but I have no way of testing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TortoiseSVN-de

Re: Enable asm for OpenSSL

lördag 3 juni 2023 kl. 18:48:01 UTC+2 skrev Stefan: good idea, haven't thought of the "schedule" action :) Learnt about it from the best in r29552 ;-) I've tried to come up with something useful in r29579, let's hope I didn't screw up too badly. /Daniel -- You received this message because

Re: Enable asm for OpenSSL

On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 6:15:52 PM UTC+2 daniel.l...@gmail.com wrote: I can ask Ian to install nasm on the build machine, but I have no idea how long that will take. Could you maybe add a nant target that enables the asm build and still use no-asm if the nant target was not called? That w

Re: Enable asm for OpenSSL

I can ask Ian to install nasm on the build machine, but I have no idea how long that will take. Could you maybe add a nant target that enables the asm build and still use no-asm if the nant target was not called? That way the nightly builds would still run through with no-asm. And users who do

Re: build.txt

Thanks. r29576. I also added instructions for building the ARM 64 version in Win64. I'd love to test building natively on ARM but I don't have such a machine... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TortoiseSVN-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: osdn.net longterm stability

I have recently learned about sourcehut.org, which seems to gain some traction as an alternative to GH. It's not as polished, but it seems to cover the basics, and it is itself a FOSS project (https://sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sourcehut/). Unfortunately, it only offers Git and Mercurial hosting at this time

Re: Enable asm for OpenSSL

On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 5:11:53 PM UTC+2 daniel.l...@gmail.com wrote: = --- ext/build/OpenSSL.build (revision 29575) +++ ext/build/OpenSSL.build (working copy) @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ - ]]] I can ask Ian to install nasm on

Re: build.txt

never realized that VS2022 is not available in a 32-bit version. I only read that it finally is available as x64 version. So yes, that section can therefore be removed. But the 'cross' option when building is still necessary when building the ARM version. -- You received this message because yo

build.txt

Hi, Since Visual Studio 2022 doesn't install on 32-bit operating systems[1], we could simplify build.txt by removing the section "build64cross Building 64 bit packages on win32 (cross-compile)". Is this ok or am I missing something? Kind regards, Daniel Sahlberg [1] https://learn.microsoft.