I hope no one will take offense, but I really think you guys are
spending too much time writing about what you will write about. These
problems will iron themselves out...just write it and work it out as you
go :)
adam
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 09:39 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 03:51:27PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Yes, it'll be possible to fork and re-use it, but it's not just a
> search-and-replace. If the book doesn't mention any of the
> philosophies which help to explain why we won't hide problems, why we
> share bugfixes and why we prefer to re
Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> To wrap this thread up: [...]
> 2. My decision, for now, is to prefer the term "open source" because it
> is, in my opinion, the simplest term for *this particular purpose*.
OK, but I hope some authors will speak up for inclusive naming.
In any case, would you comple
