Triode wrote:
> Sorry can't comment - I've not seen the driver details, but the buffer
> size will only be changable within the parameters the driver allows, so
> it is conceivable that this is the restriction.
thanks for answering, anyway :)
---
Keep in mind what mnyb pointed out above: your audio files must have the
appropriate replay gain tags. If they don't, then Smart Gain won't do
anything, as it will have no guide to how the levels should be adjusted.
Dogberr
Some brands of digital audio equipment use recycled electrons. That can
make the bits weaker (unless they are treated with slightly greasy solar
atoms).
Dogberry2's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1
There are pros and cons to using ReplayGain.
First, to my ear it does a mediocre job of volume leveling. I still use
the volume control to adjust, far more than I would expect.
Another big disadvantage is that if you also listen to streaming radio
or services like MOG, then having ReplayGain ena
JJZolx wrote:
> There are pros and cons to using ReplayGain.
>
> First, to my ear it does a mediocre job of volume leveling. I still use
> the volume control to adjust, far more than I would expect.
>
> Another big disadvantage is that if you also listen to streaming radio
> or services like MO
Yeah, I think I filed a request years ago that Squeezebox Server give us
a simple option to enter a constant volume adjustment for all streaming
content. It would at least get it to where both are in the same
ballpark.
JJZo
When I listen to 96/24 aiff files from HD tracks, I notice that the
Bitrate: 4608kbps CBR (Converted to 705kbps FLAC). Is this some kind of
down sampling? Am i still getting the same quality? Thanks
gellie's Profile: http:
JJZolx wrote:
> Yeah, I think I filed a request years ago that Squeezebox Server give us
> a simple option to enter a constant volume adjustment for all streaming
> content. It would at least get it to where both are in the same
> ballpark.
Yep. I loved the Smart Mix plugin when I first tried it
I use smart mix and no replay gain works very good, I ever felt the
need for replay gain in the direct place.
similar music tend to have similar volume in my case ? must be a bit
dependent on your library, and my cassoulet listening is not very loud
It's a bug you get the correct rate but the squeezebox displays 705k .
It is converted to FLAC by the server to preserve bandwidth but 24/96
FLAC .
why aiff ? you buy your HD tracks as FLAC in the first place ?
Mnyb's Prof
Dogberry2 wrote:
> Some brands of digital audio equipment use recycled electrons. That can
> make the bits weaker (unless they are treated with slightly greasy solar
> atoms).
The recycled electrons actually sound better, as the sharp digital edges
have worn off.
--
Mnyb wrote:
> why aiff ? you buy your HD tracks as FLAC in the first place ?
I noticed HDTracks have had some of their latest offering in aiff rather
than flac, but I converted them to flac.
Julf's Profile: http://forums.
12 matches
Mail list logo
