Your Buccaneer looks good to me !
I used a Fluke Networks DTX-1800 which gives you a print out.
Does your Buccaneer, or does it just stamp your card ? :)
*Players:* SliMP3,Squeezebox3 x3, Squeezebox Receiver, SqueezePlayer,
PiCorePlayer/RPi2/Hifiberry DAC+ x2,PiCorePlayer/RPi2/Hifiberry
DAC+P
Jeff07971 wrote:
> I wonder how these perform when tested with a proper network cable
> tester, anyone done this, can share results ?
My Buccaneers tell me it's fine
19485
+---+
|Filename: 49584-Adult-Black-Velvet-Buccaneer-Hat-
2string1 wrote:
> A better router will not better the sound correct.
No it either works or it does not .
If it was the case downloaded files would sound different depending on
thier path to you .
Main hifi: Touch + CIA
@d6jg:
DJanGo wrote:
> In a Home environment you\edit r wife /edit dont want a
> router|switch|whatever with a fat cable and a (pair of) fans.:p
Gruss
Jan
DJanGo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid
DJanGo wrote:
>
> In a Home environment you dont want a router|switch|whatever with a fat
> cable and a (pair of) fans.
That depends whether your home is also your office !! :)
19479
+---+
|Filename: IMG_2436.jpg
2string1 wrote:
> Would a Cisco Valet Plus be considered a cheap domestic router?
"cheap" - if you take that word from me - was the wrong word.. in i put
it into "brakets" for a reason.
Its low price and that didnt mean its bad|cheap if cheap is the name for
something you never would buy again e
2string1 wrote:
> Would a Cisco Valet Plus be considered a cheap domestic router?
I refer you to the reply above
> Combined modem/router/wireless are invarialby rubbish.
*Players:* SliMP3,Squeezebox3 x3, Squeezebox Receiver, SqueezePlayer,
PiCorePlayer/RPi2/Hifiberry DAC+ x2,PiCorePlayer/RPi
2string1 wrote:
> A better router will not better the sound correct.
No it will just make your network more stable, less prone to issues. If
it is working to your satisfaction - leave it as is.
A $100 ethernet cable won't make a blind bit of difference either.
*Vortexbox LMS 7.8 music on Q
A better router will not better the sound correct.
2string1's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=49758
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104828
_
2string1 wrote:
> Would a Cisco Valet Plus be considered a cheap domestic router?
Not sure. It is probably better than the norm but it was never really a
Cisco - it was one of the first "Linksys by Cisco" brandings AFAIK.
*Vortexbox LMS 7.8 music on QNAP TS419p via NFS* iThingys/iPeng/Tablets
Would a Cisco Valet Plus be considered a cheap domestic router?
2string1's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=49758
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104828
DJanGo wrote:
> Hmm if its untwisted (looks like) than its per defintion not a cat5
> cable.
> If its not a cat5 cable what definition should you set in your proper
> cable tester?
>
> I 've seen such cable that was in the box of one of my 3com pcmcia card
> an even if it looks like untwisted it
Hmm I'm also somewhat suspicius to non standard geometry it migth not
work as good as a real a cable . But in practice for the data needs at
home it migth not matter in practice
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J Meridian
Jeff07971 wrote:
> I wonder how these perform when tested with a proper network cable
> tester, anyone done this, can share results ?
Hmm if its untwisted (looks like) than its per defintion not a cat5
cable.
If its not a cat5 cable what definition should you set in your proper
cable tester?
I
Flat ether cat. 6, in real life: same perfs as a shielded, very sturdy
cat6 cable.
I have a mac connected to a giga switch connected to another that trunks
2 links into a powerdge server.
I have seen no difference whatsoever in performance when doing transfers
over NFS when I changed the link betw
Man in a van wrote:
> something like one of these is fine, I use some of the 5e stuff myself.
>
>
> Ronnie
>
>
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=flat+ethernet+cable+cat+5e&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Aflat+ethernet+cable+cat+5e
I wonder how these perform wh
epoch1970 wrote:
> I favor flat ethernet cables these days.
>
> This type of cable has the aspect ratio of a tagliatelle, and the
> flexibility of a cooked one :)
> It makes cabling much easier in tight spaces, and feels bit more fragile
> than round cables.
> It has the same performance, and sh
d6jg wrote:
> Spend as much as you like on Ethernet cables but your network will still
> only be as good as the router / switch equipment you have. A cheap
> domestic router is just that - cheap. In UK BT provide for example their
> wonderful BT Home Hub - its wi-fi is about as rubbish as you can
Let me explain something
you have no advantage using 100 octane fuel on your scooter.
You should use 100 octane fuel on your highoutput car/Motorcycle (if the
compression is that high that you need that stuff)
You should always use the things for the reason they have been made
designed for.
Spend as much as you like on Ethernet cables but your network will still
only be as good as the router / switch equipment you have. A cheap
domestic router is just that - cheap. In UK BT provide for example their
wonderful BT Home Hub - its wi-fi is about as rubbish as you can get. I
use (and have
I favor flat ethernet cables these days.
This type of cable has the aspect ratio of a tagliatelle, and the
flexibility of a cooked one :)
It makes cabling much easier in tight spaces, and feels bit more fragile
than round cables.
It has the same performance, and should be about the same price.
2string1 wrote:
> Cat ? would be the best?
Only for the seller. ;)
toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104828
__
22 matches
Mail list logo
