[SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs Duet question..

2013-11-22 Thread swayzak
Is the DAC on the Touch technically better than that in the Duet Receiver, or equivalent ? swayzak's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16575 View this thread:

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs Duet question..

2013-11-22 Thread Mnyb
It's technically somewhat better lower better s/n ratio lower distorsion lower noise and wider freq response (24/96 samplerate) Se here http://archimago.blogspot.se/2013/06/measurements-squeezebox-duet-receiver.html +---+

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs Duet question..

2013-11-22 Thread swayzak
Cheers swayzak's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16575 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=100418 ___ Touch mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs Duet question..

2013-11-22 Thread aubuti
In addition to the DAC itself, many on this forum (including some whom I regard as quite knowledgeable on the subject) have claimed that the audio quality of the Touch is also better because of a cleaner signal path (ie, less noise) within the unit. Or something like that.

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs Duet question..

2013-11-22 Thread Mnyb
Yeah the digital outs are also claimed to be better . As a digital transport it sure is as good as it gets in practice . ( my main hifi is in my signature ). But I do not use the internal DAC in any critical position I tried it briefly with my old amp and speakers years ago and it was ok I fi

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2012-09-19 Thread alfista
garym wrote: He means remove stand from the touch. But good point. One can lay it about however one wants Damn, knew it was a mistake posting after a few days of business travel, long work days and minimal sleep. Yep, it was the Touch that I meant. I haven't got the Touch or the Receiver to

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2012-09-18 Thread H�agen-Dazs
Thanks for input! I think I will go for another Touch. The open source Touch will hopefully last longer, now that Squeezebox-support ends. Touch is a newer design, and maybe better hard-ware? Häagen-Dazs's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2012-09-18 Thread azinck3
Häagen-Dazs wrote: Thanks for input! I think I will go for another Touch. The open source Touch will hopefully last longer, now that Squeezebox-support ends. Touch is a newer design, and maybe better hard-ware? Yes, no question. The Touch is far superior to the Duet in virtually every way.

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2012-09-18 Thread alfista
hvb83 wrote: I wasn't very clear on that. What I meant was that for some people the small size of the Duet is important since it can be tucked away, for other people the 24/96kzh capability of the Touch is important. Yank the stand from the Duet and it'll be roughly the same size as the

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2012-09-18 Thread garym
alfista wrote: Yank the stand from the Duet and it'll be roughly the same size as the Receiver (albeit with a possibly less practical connector placement) so that shouldn't be the deciding factor unless you happen to only have an exact Receiver-sized slot available. He means remove stand

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2012-09-14 Thread musicom
I have the Touch, SB3 and Duet. The Touch sounds best of the lot via analog outs (and tests best in Stereophile test reports). The Duet presently is used with a dac in the HT processor in a 5.1 theatre setup to play music in that room. But the critical 2 channel listening room gets the Touch

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2012-09-13 Thread H�agen-Dazs
If I understand this correctly, my server software is on the Vortexbox Appliance - would I ever have to modify anything on my Squeezebox as long as I´m only using it for transport? Häagen-Dazs's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2012-09-13 Thread garym
Häagen-Dazs wrote: If I understand this correctly, my server software is on the Vortexbox Appliance - would I ever have to modify anything on my Squeezebox as long as I´m only using it for transport? my advice. buy a touch (they are discontinued, but still available). Use this as your

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2012-09-11 Thread H�agen-Dazs
I´m looking for a new Squeezebox. I´ve been happy with both the Touch and the Radio. This time I need a Squeezebox for my headphones. I will use a separate DAC, so the sound quality shouldn´t be an issue? I use a Vortexbox Appliance as server. What would be the best transport; Duet or Touch?

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2012-09-11 Thread Mnyb
Häagen-Dazs wrote: I´m looking for a new Squeezebox. I´ve been happy with both the Touch and the Radio. This time I need a Squeezebox for my headphones. I will use a separate DAC, so the sound quality shouldn´t be an issue? I use a Vortexbox Appliance as server. What would be the best

[SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2011-02-16 Thread 93014
I'm trying to decide between the Touch and Duet. What are the fundamental differences I should know about them (aside from the location of displays) ? They are almost the same price on Amazon. I am interested in using Squeezebox primarily to play classical recordings with maximum fidelity.

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2011-02-16 Thread magiccarpetride
93014;611602 Wrote: I'm trying to decide between the Touch and Duet. What are the fundamental differences I should know about them (aside from the location of displays) ? They are almost the same price on Amazon. I am interested in using Squeezebox primarily to play classical recordings

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2011-02-16 Thread 93014
Are you saying that aside from price (which is negligible at least at Amazon) there are features on the Touch that I would not have on the Duet? Please advise. Thanks. -- 93014 93014's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2011-02-16 Thread amcluesent
are features on the Touch that I would not have on the Duet? Yep. http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/Hardware_comparison -- amcluesent amcluesent's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10286 View

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2011-02-16 Thread bhaagensen
Unless you really want the fancy handset, the controller, there is no reason at all not to get the Touch. In other words, the Touch is better at everything else but the remote/controller. -- bhaagensen bhaagensen's

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2011-02-16 Thread dsdreamer
A SB Touch gives pretty astonishing sound quality when used with good amplifier and speakers. Check out the Amazon.com customer review distribution on both products, and I think you will detect a higher satisfaction rate with the Touch than the Duet. The Controller part of the Duet solution

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2011-02-16 Thread Rick58
if you register another Logitech product (online). My wife registered an older mouse (she was trying to fix a problem) and instantly we got a 20% off next purchase code in an email. Earlier that day I made the decision to purchase the Touch - so I got it for $240 with free shipping direct from

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2011-02-16 Thread fillmore
in my experience the wifi signal for touch is far superior. -- fillmore fillmore's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23178 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=85717

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch vs. Duet

2011-02-16 Thread bigblackdog
+1 for the touch. I have both and do find that the touch is less prone to technical foibles. The controller on the duet is nice however as you will read in a few posts the screen can dim over time and mine is now only readable in very low light conditions. The use of an iPad or iPhone with iPeng