Bould Design did do the design for both Radio and Touch.
___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Fred Bould is mentioned in the credits of both Touch and Radio. I don't
know if it means he was actually involved in the design, he was brought
in by Slim Devices for the SB3, Logitech likely does this in-house now.
--
Mark Lanctot
Current: SB2, Transporter, Boom (PQP3 - late beta, PQP1 - ear
autopilot;455572 Wrote:
> The one criticism i have with the physical design is the screen size.
> Not the size per-say, but the fact the border between the screen and
> casing is to big. But it looks far worse in the photos i have seen, it
> does look a lot better in the flesh. It a nice looking
The one criticism i have with the physical design is the screen size.
Not the size per-say, but the fact the border between the screen and
casing is to big. But it looks far worse in the photos i have seen, it
does look a lot better in the flesh. It a nice looking bit of kit.
--
autopilot
Chee
The Touch is narrower and slightly taller than the Classic. Actual
dimensions are on the website. It is also thinner and leans back at a
slightly greater angle.
--
Mark Miksis
Mark Miksis's Profile: http://forums.slimdev
I regret the wide bezel around the screen. The height / width ratio is
also different, but I'm unsure this has to do with my impression. Anyway
i'd like to see one in the flesh; pictures can be deceiving.
--
epoch1970
epoc
epoch1970 wrote:
> It surely doesn't look bad, but the SB3 is sooo elegant.
> My opinion only.
I may be blind, but the Touch looks a lot like the SB3.
What don't you like?
(I have zero clue if Fred was involved)
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
_
(Sorry, I couldn't resist.)
It surely doesn't look bad, but the SB3 is sooo elegant.
My opinion only.
--
epoch1970
epoch1970's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16711
View this thread: http://forums
