Thanks for reporting this issue - this sounds like it might be suitable
as a StableReleaseUpdate - in particular the Regressions section
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Regressions sounds relevant
in this case. Could you please adapt this bug report following the
template in https://wi
Summary D vs E:
- no suffix
=> works equally in both releases
=> same opcodes in all .code segments
- suffix "w"
=> works equally in both releases
=> opcodes in .code32/.code64 differ from .code16 (660f..)
=> .code16 matches the non-suffix opcodes (0f..)
- suffix "l"
=> failures in Disc
Result Disco:
### Testing suffix '' ###
.code16
push %gs
push %fs
pop %gs
pop %fs
.code32
push %gs
push %fs
pop %gs
pop %fs
.code64
push %gs
push %fs
pop %gs
pop %fs
push.out: file format elf64-x86-64
Disassembly of section .text:
<.text>:
0: 0f a8 p
Result Eoan:
### Testing suffix '' ###
.code16
push %gs
push %fs
pop %gs
pop %fs
.code32
push %gs
push %fs
pop %gs
pop %fs
.code64
push %gs
push %fs
pop %gs
pop %fs
push.out: file format elf64-x86-64
Disassembly of section .text:
<.text>:
0: 0f a8 pu
Slightly extending on that test by Valentine I really think this is a change in
binutils behavior.
Attaching a script to test which I then will add logs from Disco (older 2.32)
and Eoan (2.32.51).
The script does:
- test pop/push with suffixes "" w l q
- test this in code 16/32/64 blocks
** Att
Quoting a post of a ipxe related developer that did a nice check
realizing that e.g. disassembly always lists pushq (and opcode stays the
same) - thanks to Valentine for these checks!:
AFAIU, segment registers
are 16-bit long, however, "pushl" and "pushq" should also be valid and
produce the same
FYI: The comparison to Fedora (there it still works) uses binutils
2.31.1-29.fc30.x86_64 still.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843394
Title:
FTBFS in Eoa
[Expired for pulseaudio (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
h
[Expired for linux (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bug
[Expired for pulseaudio (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
h
[Expired for network-manager (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity
for 60 days.]
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manag
Public bug reported:
I'm testing out eoan, I have a [Network] section with IPMasquerade=yes.
The system starts without complaint from systemd in the logs, but I see no
evidence of source natting going on.
I'm not sure of sub-dependencies, but I think source natting depends on
libiptc-dev, which
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1842022 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842022
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1842022, so is being marked as such.
The attachment "eoan debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-
sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can
review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a
patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the
"patch" tag, and if you a
** Changed in: evolution-data-server
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843627
Title:
evolution-calendar-fact
Built a eoan package with xnox's updated patch in my ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~bryanquigley/+archive/ubuntu/1796501/+packages
1. Confirm failure with DNSSEC=yes, DNS server 1.1.1.1
$ resolvectl query people.com.cn
people.com.cn: resolve call failed: DNSSEC validation failed: failed-auxiliary
2.
@vorlon: You can check in the Bileto ticket that the autopkgtests for
242 are all green (except for a single ostree one).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18437
@vorlon: I got reports against v243 via IRC, too, but those were
expected since autopkgtests were also failing in releated areas.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
@vorlon: Those regressions are found in 243 RC1, I'm now preparing 243
final which has new regressions compared to 243 RC1. Many regressions
introduced in 243 were reported to upstream and got fixed in 243 final,
but not all of them.
There were two regression identified in 242 (regressing network-
That bug specifically calls out that 243 was removed because it
introduced regressions upstream.
It is left unclear whether these regressions applied to 242.
Were all of the regressions in 243 identified by way of autopkgtests?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
@vorlon: Please see the discussion in LP: #1841790.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843755
Title:
[FFe] Please accept systemd 242 to Eoan
Status in system
@vorlon: If you don's see that convincing I don't know what you are looking
for. 242 now is as well tested as 241 when it entered Eoan and it is still not
too late in the cycle to fix/revert if something breaks.
Imo the most important aspect is preparing for 20.04 LTS and 242 in Eoan serves
that
Thanks for your bug report. It seems I did not add all switches from the
show command to the info alias when adding it.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Here is the wpa supplicant log, gathered as per:
https://gist.github.com/wch/8305204#gistcomment-2477237
https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Nm7G6STc22/
Note there are 3 sections.
The first section starts with "wpa_supplicant v2.6"
When I upgrade to 2.9 you can see this start with "wpa_supplicant v2.9"
Wh
Public bug reported:
When the volume is set to around 50% in PulseAudio (using the Ubuntu
Sound preferences screen but cross-checked by simply viewing with
pavucontrol) the alsamixer volume is set to 0%. I can see the volume
rise quickly as the volume is raised past 50% in the Sound preferences
sc
This still seems to be a problem on Ubuntu 19.04. Ie, if I do:
$ sudo systemctl status systemd-rfkill
● systemd-rfkill.service - Load/Save RF Kill Switch Status
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/systemd-rfkill.service; static; vendor
preset:
...
$ rfkill block bluetooth
$ rfkill
ID TYPE
Public bug reported:
When getting info about a package, I see a notice asking me to "Please
use the '-a' switch", but the apt program does not accept an '-a'
switch.
Steps to reproduce:
$ apt info docker.io
...
N: There is 1 additional record. Please use the '-a' switch to see it
$ apt -a info do
If we can find something in wpa's log (however one gets them) and an
upstream fix for that, that would be great. If you can, I suggest you
try to git bisect the upstream repository from 2.6 to 2.9 and see what
commit breaks it.
Please note that custom kernels are not supported, and we can't be sur
I'm not sure the NM log is very useful, a wpa supplicant log would
probably be helpful, but no idea on gathering that.
** No longer affects: wpasupplicant (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu
This bug was fixed in the package dnsmasq - 2.80-1ubuntu2
---
dnsmasq (2.80-1ubuntu2) eoan; urgency=medium
* Fix FTBFS in eoan due to glibc 2.30 SIOCGSTAMP changes (LP:
#1843430)
-- Christian Ehrhardt Tue, 10 Sep
2019 15:00:04 +0200
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Status
** Description changed:
Running on arm64 eoan build with kernel from raspberry pi folks (
4.19.71-v8-g6de367fd7 ) on a rpi4.
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu Eoan Ermine (development branch)
Release:19.10
-
- With wpasupplicant 2.29, wifi comes up on boot, but then drops
cut'n'pasting the changelog (especially with bad word wrapping) does not
constitute 'analysis' and is not particularly consumable by the release
team.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://
I added in the description, the changelog to know what has been introduced in
this release, something I would personally appreciate to have in my dailyjob is:
* systemd.volatile=overlay
* systemd-networkd-wait-online gained a new setting --any for waiting
* networkctl list/status/lldp now accept g
Public bug reported:
Running on arm64 eoan build with kernel from raspberry pi folks (
4.19.71-v8-g6de367fd7 ) on a rpi4.
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu Eoan Ermine (development branch)
Release:19.10
With wpasupplicant 2.29, wifi comes up on boot, but then drops out shortly
the
I do not think this FFe request provides sufficient rationale for why we
would want to make an exception. (Neither Debian testing having a newer
version, nor "carrying fewer patches", are a compelling reason.)
It also does not include any in-depth analysis of the risks, beyond
saying that 241 is
Public bug reported:
libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include/lttng -I../include
-I../include -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DUST_COMPONENT=libringbuffer
-Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=.
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c
Upstream fix: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/83d4ab5533 (in
systemd-242).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812316
Title:
systemd: lack of seat ve
Public bug reported:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/441264543/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-
ppc64el.protobuf_3.6.1.3-2_BUILDING.txt.gz
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -pthread
-DHAVE_PTHREAD=1 -DHAVE_ZLIB=1 -Wall -Wextra -Werror -Wno-unused-parameter -g
-O3 -fdebug-prefix
Public bug reported:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/441268300/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-
ppc64el.mir_1.1.1-0ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz
63% tests passed, 159 tests failed out of 424
Total Test time (real) = 603.12 sec
The following tests FAILED:
5 - miral_wlcs_tests.BadBufferTest.* (Failed)
Public bug reported:
Eoan currently has 241-7ubuntu1, Debian stable has 241 and Debian testing moved
to 242 last week.
While version 241 is the safer choice for Eoan (from v241 and v242) since it is
widely tested updating to v242 will allow us to carry fewer patches in Eoan and
makes moving to
Public bug reported:
i386, ppc64el, s390x
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/441264120/buildlog_ubuntu-
eoan-i386.libseccomp_2.4.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.3_BUILDING.txt.gz
Regression Test Summary
tests run: 15896
tests skipped: 182
tests passed: 15894
tests failed: 2
tests errored: 36
=
Public bug reported:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/441262252/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-
amd64.libsecret_0.18.8-1_BUILDING.txt.gz
Testsuite summary for libsecret 0.18.8
Public bug reported:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/441262641/buildlog_ubuntu-
eoan-i386.liblockfile_1.15-1_BUILDING.txt.gz
gcc -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -fPIC -shared
-Wl,-soname,liblockfile.so.1 \
-o liblockfile.so lockfile.o -lc
gcc -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=.
** Tags added: ftbfs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843394
Title:
FTBFS in Eoan - Error: operand type mismatch for `push' - gcc 9.2.1 /
binutils 2.32.5
Feel free then, I'm just really unsure personally about us being able to
fix regressions, but if you think that is an OK risk then fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pango1.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
Public bug reported:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/441262209/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-
amd64.klibc_2.0.6-1ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
gcc -Wp,-MD,usr/klibc/.sigsuspend.o.d -nostdinc -iwithprefix include
-I/<>/usr/include/arch/x86_64 -Iusr/include/arch/x86_64
-I/<>/usr/include/bits64 -Iusr/include/bit
Public bug reported:
fftw3 ftbfs in eoan (armhf only).
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/441265031/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-
armhf.fftw3_3.3.8-2_BUILDING.txt.gz
( cd tests ; /usr/bin/make smallcheck )
make[1]: Entering directory '/<>/tests'
perl -w ./check.pl -r -c=1 -v `pwd`/bench
Executing "/<>/tests
I'm unsure we have someone in the team/around who knows enough about
font rendering to weigh in. I would go forward now with the update
because I feel like it's a safer road for the LTS to land changes
earlier than later, that time we get one buffer nonLTS cycle to get
feedback sort out issues (al
** Tags added: ftbfs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843430
Title:
FTBFS in Eoan due to new glibc - error: ‘SIOCGSTAMP’ undeclared
Status in dnsmasq packa
Public bug reported:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/441262638/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-
amd64.dee_1.2.7+17.10.20170616-4ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
deprecated glib/gtk symbols
** Affects: dee (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: Confirmed
** Tags: ftbfs rls-ee-incoming
** Tags added: ftbfs
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.8.3
---
apt (1.8.3) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Simon Körner ]
* http: Fix Host header in proxied https connections (LP: #1838771)
[ Brian Murray ]
* Do not include squashfs file systems in df output. (LP: #1756595)
apt (1.8.2) unstab
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.8.3
---
apt (1.8.3) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Simon Körner ]
* http: Fix Host header in proxied https connections (LP: #1838771)
[ Brian Murray ]
* Do not include squashfs file systems in df output. (LP: #1756595)
apt (1.8.2) unstab
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regr
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.8.3
---
apt (1.8.3) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Simon Körner ]
* http: Fix Host header in proxied https connections (LP: #1838771)
[ Brian Murray ]
* Do not include squashfs file systems in df output. (LP: #1756595)
apt (1.8.2) unstab
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regr
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.6.12
---
apt (1.6.12) bionic; urgency=medium
[ TilmanK ]
* Fix typo in German manpage translation
[ Michael Zhivich ]
* methods: https: handle requests for TLS re-handshake (LP: #1829861)
[ Julian Andres Klode ]
* Unlock dpkg loc
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.8.3
---
apt (1.8.3) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Simon Körner ]
* http: Fix Host header in proxied https connections (LP: #1838771)
[ Brian Murray ]
* Do not include squashfs file systems in df output. (LP: #1756595)
apt (1.8.2) unstab
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regr
The verification of the Stable Release Update for apt has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regr
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.6.12
---
apt (1.6.12) bionic; urgency=medium
[ TilmanK ]
* Fix typo in German manpage translation
[ Michael Zhivich ]
* methods: https: handle requests for TLS re-handshake (LP: #1829861)
[ Julian Andres Klode ]
* Unlock dpkg loc
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.6.12
---
apt (1.6.12) bionic; urgency=medium
[ TilmanK ]
* Fix typo in German manpage translation
[ Michael Zhivich ]
* methods: https: handle requests for TLS re-handshake (LP: #1829861)
[ Julian Andres Klode ]
* Unlock dpkg loc
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.6.12
---
apt (1.6.12) bionic; urgency=medium
[ TilmanK ]
* Fix typo in German manpage translation
[ Michael Zhivich ]
* methods: https: handle requests for TLS re-handshake (LP: #1829861)
[ Julian Andres Klode ]
* Unlock dpkg loc
Public bug reported:
After using apport to report a problem in gnome-shell in the file
'ShellJournal.txt' private information appears, such as the name of the
Notebook.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: apport 2.20.11-0ubuntu7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-10.11-generic 5
[VERIFICATION BIONIC]
It looks good to me testing with the above [Test Case].
# apt-get update
Hit:1 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease
==> Hit:2 https://packages.microsoft.com/repos/azure-cli bionic InRelease
Hit:3 http://archive.ubun
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
I have exactly the same problem described in the title since 2018-11-27,
when I bought this laptop.
My configuration:
HP Elitebook 840 G1
Ubuntu 18.04
The same issue does not hit Windows, which I dual boot with.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seed
Eric, could you check the package and make sure the fix works as
expected for you as well?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838771
Title:
http:Fix Host header i
So, uh, I tried another reboot so I could debug the problem some more,
and ... well ... the machine booted. No problems. I've no idea what's
going on, feel free to close this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe
I have had another dev try this on fedora which also has gcc 9.2.1 and
it works there.
But since it fails in "as" which is actually binutils lets add that as a bug
task.
Maybe binutils developers know something about this?
** Summary changed:
- FTBFS in Eoan - Error: operand type mismatch for `
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843430
Title:
FTBFS in Eoan due to new glibc - error: ‘SI
Oops, I didn't read the error messages closely enough, sorry!
(Also the mirror came back up right when I applied the
Acquire::ForceIPv4 "true"; workaround, making me think my initial
analysis was right. What a coincidence!)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Also affects: binutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843394
Title:
FTBFS in Eoan - Error: operan
72 matches
Mail list logo
