[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040108] Re: error "contains an invalid sample specification."

2024-01-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for pulseaudio (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043929] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.140ubuntu13.1 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс из пакета initramfs-tools установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

2024-01-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049960] [NEW] polkitd.postinst script refers to non-existent /usr/libexec/polkitd

2024-01-19 Thread Daniel Richard G.
Public bug reported: I am seeing this on Ubuntu noble with polkitd 123-3. After debootstrap'ing a minimal system, I run # apt-get install linux-generic which pulls in polkitd as a dependency. In the output, I see the following: Setting up polkitd (123-3) ... Creating group

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049318] Re: [SRU] free(): double free detected in tcache 2

2024-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Jo, or anyone else affected, Accepted iptables into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/1.8.7-1ubuntu5.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049958] [NEW] package bluez-obexd 5.68-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to make backup link of './usr/lib/bluetooth/obexd' before installing new version: Input/output

2024-01-19 Thread phillip bolton-frank
Public bug reported: bug found during software update launched from bootable usb ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10 Package: bluez-obexd 5.68-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-9.9-generic 6.5.3 Uname: Linux 6.5.0-9-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs ApportVersion:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2042587] Re: jammy's version breaks existing dhcp scripts with relay

2024-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected, Accepted dnsmasq into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/2.86-1.1ubuntu0.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045570] Re: dnsmasq crash when no servers in resolv.conf

2024-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Alfred, or anyone else affected, Accepted dnsmasq into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/2.86-1.1ubuntu0.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1994165] Re: CMS_final: do not ignore CMS_dataFinal result

2024-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Gil, or anyone else affected, Accepted openssl into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023545] Re: [UBUNTU 22.04] openssl with ibmca engine configured dumps core when creating a new certificate

2024-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected, Accepted openssl into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2033422] Re: openssl: backport to jammy "clear method store / query cache confusion"

2024-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Adrien, or anyone else affected, Accepted openssl into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040011] Re: [SRU] Ensure supported codenames are accurate

2024-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: In Progress => Incomplete ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: In Progress => Incomplete ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2041396] Re: gdb 12.1 generates SIGILL on armhf

2024-01-19 Thread Zixing Liu
> The where problems could occur section says "it is possible that this fix may break ARM64 execution". How was it verified that this is not broken? I believe this could be verified by running the GDB tests inside the Rust testing suite. Should I queue an autopkgtest against rustc for GDB in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2041396] Re: gdb 12.1 generates SIGILL on armhf

2024-01-19 Thread Brian Murray
The where problems could occur section says "it is possible that this fix may break ARM64 execution". How was it verified that this is not broken? ** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047705] Re: Packaging ships /etc/gtk-3.0/settings.ini, forcing the GTK3 theme to Yaru and preventing flavors from overriding it with XDG configuration

2024-01-19 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047705 Title: Packaging ships

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases

2024-01-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I updated the tasks on this bug after having verified what has LXC_DEVEL set to 1, so we should be good now in terms of affected releases. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases

2024-01-19 Thread Simon Déziel
In fact, the same but updated note was already on https://documentation.ubuntu.com/lxd/en/latest/installing/#install-lxd- from-source where it mentions that it affects 22.04 onward while the one you dug up says 23.04/23.10 are not affected ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046526] Re: pam_access Configuration Treats TTY Names as Hostnames

2024-01-19 Thread Marc Deslauriers
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046526 Title: pam_access Configuration Treats TTY Names as

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047595] Re: sound control panel security

2024-01-19 Thread Marc Deslauriers
** Package changed: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047595 Title: sound control panel security Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046633] Re: Don't include 'nmcli -f all con' output in bug report (for privacy)

2024-01-19 Thread Marc Deslauriers
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046633 Title: Don't include 'nmcli -f all con' output

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047595] Re: sound control panel security

2024-01-19 Thread Marc Deslauriers
What desktop environment are you using? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047595 Title: sound control panel security Status in gnome-shell package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases

2024-01-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Food for thought for an SRU, here is an example of an upstream that noted[1] this problem: NOTE: If you use the `liblxc-dev` package and get compile time errors when building the `go-lxc` module, ensure that the value for `LXC_DEVEL` is `0` for your `liblxc` build. To check that, look

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049239] Re: package linux-image-6.5.0-14-generic 6.5.0-14.14~22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2024-01-19 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases

2024-01-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I imported your noble debdiff and pushed to this branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+git/lxc/+ref/noble- lxc-drop-devel-2039873 If you run "git ubuntu clone lxc; cd lxc; git ubuntu remote add ahasenack; git checkout noble-lxc-drop-devel-2039873" you should have a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases

2024-01-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Also affects: lxc (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: lxc (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: lxc (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958019]

2024-01-19 Thread darinsmiller
Canonical occasionally breaks sound compatibility between kernel release (but I yet to figure out why). However, the XanMod kernel quite rarely breaks Lenovo sound compatibility, thus I suggest you give that kernel a whirl: https://xanmod.org/ (It's quite easy to install and remove if needed).

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958019]

2024-01-19 Thread cam
Probably time to bisect and then report back to Cirrus Logic. On 1/18/24 16:53, bugzilla-dae...@kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208555 > > --- Comment #806 from Howard Chu (h...@highlandsun.com) --- > (In reply to Cameron Berkenpas from comment #805) >> I believe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958019]

2024-01-19 Thread hyc
(In reply to Cameron Berkenpas from comment #805) > I believe support for the 16ACHg6 was added quite a ways back. Yes, it was added in 5.18. It is broken in 6.x. That's why I still only run 5.19 on my machine. The comment below says it actually stopped working in 6.6. I can't confirm that it

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958019]

2024-01-19 Thread cam
I believe support for the 16ACHg6 was added quite a ways back. On 1/18/24 05:36, bugzilla-dae...@kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208555 > > shenanig...@duck.com changed: > > What|Removed |Added >

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958019]

2024-01-19 Thread shenanigans
(In reply to Howard Chu from comment #791) > (In reply to Miggy from comment #790) > > It seems the sound no longer works for the legion 7 16achg6 on kernel 6.6. > > It's been working great for the last year on all kernels, but 6.6 just > > doesn't work. > > > > I'm not sure if anyone else is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040011] Re: [SRU] Ensure supported codenames are accurate

2024-01-19 Thread Timo Aaltonen
please fix the header to have the required SRU information -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040011 Title: [SRU] Ensure supported codenames are accurate Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047450] Please test proposed package

2024-01-19 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Hello dann, or anyone else affected, Accepted coreutils into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/8.32-4.1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047450] Re: tail emits no output for sysfs files when using large page kernels

2024-01-19 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Hello dann, or anyone else affected, Accepted coreutils into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/9.1-1ubuntu2.23.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031841] Re: initramfs-tools and dracut install different sets of kernel modules

2024-01-19 Thread Benjamin Drung
For the record, these commits refer to this bug: Filter net kernel modules by symbol regexp from dracut https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/commit/?id=55a7cf12c037ccd14a0241aa8cab085f6f8590d8 Filter block kernel modules by symbol regex from dracut

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049540] Re: hundreds of differences in module list between initramfs-tools version 0.142ubuntu10 and version 0.142ubuntu11

2024-01-19 Thread Benjamin Drung
What is the problem here? Is there any proof that these modules are needed? These four commit refer to bug #2031841 and cause the difference: Filter net kernel modules by symbol regexp from dracut

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037604] Re: Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack

2024-01-19 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Thanks a lot for these, so we're good on AMD platforms. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037604 Title: Backport packages for 22.04.4 HWE stack Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049885] [NEW] Merge console-setup (1.223) from Debian

2024-01-19 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Public bug reported: In Debian console-setup (1.223) is available. It should be merged into Noble. ** Affects: console-setup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Heinrich Schuchardt (xypron) Status: New ** Changed in: console-setup (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049881] Re: pango1.0: FTBFS against glibc 2.39 snapshot

2024-01-19 Thread Simon Chopin
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin) ** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049881] Re: pango1.0: FTBFS against glibc 2.39 snapshot

2024-01-19 Thread Simon Chopin
I'm currently focused on cataloguing failures, but I'll try to investigate it if nobody has picked it up by then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pango1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049881

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049881] [NEW] pango1.0: FTBFS against glibc 2.39 snapshot

2024-01-19 Thread Simon Chopin
Public bug reported: Hi, The package pango1.0 failed to build during the recent full archive test rebuild against a snapshot of the the development branch for the upcoming glibc 2.39, expected to land in Noble. This was subsequently confirmed locally against a more recent snapshot. Full logs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1568726] Re: iconv stdio buffering

2024-01-19 Thread Simon Chopin
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974056] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-01-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-19 05:42 EDT--- @xnox, @Boris, are there any updates on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974056

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982693] Re: USB-Audio device UMC204HD disappears after suspend

2024-01-19 Thread Kerem B
I have in the meantime switched to a new PC and this problem doesn't occur any more. Sorry I cannot be of help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982693

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049369] Re: autopkg tests ignored for migration of python3-defaults adding 3.12

2024-01-19 Thread James Page
Merged version uploaded which should unblock the autopkgtest. ** Changed in: python-oslo.versionedobjects (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049369] Re: autopkg tests ignored for migration of python3-defaults adding 3.12

2024-01-19 Thread James Page
The oslo.versionedobjects autopkgtests appear to be broken in Debian (but working in the 0ubuntu1 version we had before); I'll untangle this and upload a merged version to fix this. ** Changed in: python-oslo.versionedobjects (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2048388] Re: Test suite often fails with "systemd units changed without reload" on s390x

2024-01-19 Thread Olivier Gayot
The last two autopkgtest runs in the infrastructure are green despite the trigger and they both show: 258s Unpacking wpasupplicant (2:2.10-21) ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.