[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051672] Re: Backport iproute2 6.8.0 to noble

2024-04-30 Thread Andrea Righi
Thanks @dannf for updating the bug! The SRU description looks good to me and everything seems reasonable, same with the plan. I'll keep monitoring this tracker and we'll proceed once oracular will be open. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051672] Re: [FFe] Merge iproute2 with the latest Debian version: 6.8.0-1 from testing/unstable (main)

2024-04-29 Thread Andrea Righi
Hello, any progress on this? Now that ubuntu-fan is officially deprecated in Noble can we simply sync iproute2 with Debian? Is there any pending activity / requirement that are preventing this? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2063298] [NEW] deprecate ubuntu-fan in Noble

2024-04-23 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: [Impact] In order to provide ubuntu-fan we need to maintain additional kernel SAUCE patches that are currently conflicting with upstream code, potentially breaking networking eBPF APIs. To prevent such incompatibility the whole patch set requires a major redesign. However,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051672] Re: [FFe] Merge iproute2 with the latest Debian version: 6.8.0-1 from testing/unstable (main)

2024-04-17 Thread Andrea Righi
According to the information that I collected (asking around, investigating, etc.), it seems that there are no critical users of ubuntu-fan. Moreover, considering the impact of the ubuntu-fan kernel patches (that would require a major refactoring to avoid breaking the network eBPF ABI), we

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038433] [NEW] systemd autopkgtest regression on arm64 and s390x on mantic

2023-10-04 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: tests-in-lxd seems to fail to download the lxd image used for the test (or something similar), looking at the log: ... Publishing instance: Image pack: 85% (5.51MB/s) Instance published with fingerprint: 83b511be44395f2afc7d4d1ee0708cb18834c8b15cb208c9d218964ed8479114

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992979] Re: kinetic ppc64le reporting Failed to send WATCHDOG=1 notification message: Transport endpoint is not connected

2022-10-14 Thread Andrea Righi
It could be related to #1991691 if you're using the kernel currently in release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992979 Title: kinetic ppc64le reporting

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990824] Re: initramfs-tools: out-of-memory failures during autopkgtest

2022-09-26 Thread Andrea Righi
All the initramfs-tools autopkgtest tests seem to run fine on a recent kernel (5.19) with the debdiff in attach applied. ** Patch added: "initramfs-tools-increase-ram-2GB.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990824] [NEW] initramfs-tools: out-of-memory failures during autopkgtest

2022-09-26 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: [Impact] Some autopkgtest tests are failing due to out-of-memory conditions, especially amd64-ata-only and net. It seems that we are creating a VM with 1GB only to run the amd64-ata- only test and even just 512MB for the net test. It probably makes sense to create larger

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971418] Re: network-manager/1.36.4-2ubuntu1 ADT test failure with linux/5.15.0-28.29

2022-07-28 Thread Andrea Righi
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu Kinetic) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Kinetic) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Also affects: urfkill (Ubuntu Kinetic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1975587] Re: systemd: fix test-execute autotest failure with kernel 5.15 in focal

2022-05-24 Thread Andrea Righi
This seems to fix the test failure. ** Patch added: "systemd-test-make-test-execute-pass-on-Linux-5.15.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1975587/+attachment/5592621/+files/systemd-test-make-test-execute-pass-on-Linux-5.15.debdiff ** Patch removed:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1975587] Re: systemd: fix test-execute autotest failure with kernel 5.15 in focal

2022-05-24 Thread Andrea Righi
** Patch added: "systemd-test-make-test-execute-pass-on-Linux-5.15.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1975587/+attachment/5592620/+files/systemd-test-make-test-execute-pass-on-Linux-5.15.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1975587] [NEW] systemd: fix test-execute autotest failure with kernel 5.15 in focal

2022-05-24 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: [Impact] test-execute autotest is failing in focal with kernel 5.15. This is because the following kernel commit changed the ABI for ioprio: e70344c05995 ("block: fix default IO priority handling") Previously setting IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE for a process would report

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971593] Re: make wireless-tools a dependency for network-manager

2022-05-04 Thread Andrea Righi
** Description changed: The wpa-dhclient autopkgtest is always failing without wireless-tools - installed. Maybe wireless-tools should be an explicit dependency of - network-manager. + installed. Maybe wireless-tools should be added to the test dependencies + (debian/tests/control). -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971593] [NEW] make wireless-tools a dependency for network-manager

2022-05-04 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: The wpa-dhclient autopkgtest is always failing without wireless-tools installed. Maybe wireless-tools should be an explicit dependency of network-manager. ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961196] Re: apparmor autotest failure on jammy with linux 5.15

2022-02-21 Thread Andrea Righi
updated debdiff in attach FWIW ** Patch added: "apparmor-fix-autotests.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1961196/+attachment/5562493/+files/apparmor-fix-autotests.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961196] Re: apparmor autotest failure on jammy with linux 5.15

2022-02-18 Thread Andrea Righi
@alexmurray thanks for the update! BTW I found another issue with test- network.py: this test is failing because utils/apparmor/rule/network.py is missing the mctp protocol (in network_domain_keywords[]). I checked upstream, but I couldn't find any fix for this, do you want me to open another

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961196] Re: apparmor autotest failure on jammy with linux 5.15

2022-02-17 Thread Andrea Righi
Simple fix in the attached debdiff ** Patch added: "apparmor-fix-test-aa-notify.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1961196/+attachment/5561612/+files/apparmor-fix-test-aa-notify.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961196] Re: apparmor autotest failure on jammy with linux 5.15

2022-02-17 Thread Andrea Righi
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + test-aa-notify is also checking if the output of `aa-notify --help` + matches a specific text. However it looks like this output has changed + in jammy so the autopkgtest is reporting errors like this: + 05:17:31 ERROR| [stderr] === test-aa-notify.py ===

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961196] [NEW] apparmor autotest failure on jammy with linux 5.15

2022-02-17 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: 05:17:31 ERROR| [stderr] === test-aa-notify.py === 05:17:31 ERROR| [stderr] .ssF. 05:17:31 ERROR| [stderr] == 05:17:31 ERROR| [stderr] FAIL: test_help_contents (__main__.AANotifyTest) 05:17:31 ERROR|

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951390] Re: update iproute2

2022-02-08 Thread Andrea Righi
Adding also focal, because with the new linux-hwe-5.15 we get the same failure. ** Summary changed: - update iproute2 in jammy + update iproute2 ** Also affects: iproute2 (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958904] Re: autopkgtest is failing on jammy with "no space left on device"

2022-01-25 Thread Andrea Righi
debdiff in attach can help to prevent this problem from happening (bumping up image file to 2GB). ** Patch added: "initramfs-tools-prevent-out-of-disk-space-error-during-autotest.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958904] [NEW] autopkgtest is failing on jammy with "no space left on device"

2022-01-24 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: In debian/tests/prep-image we create an image file of 1GB, but recent jammy cloud images are (barely) bigger than that, for example the current one uncompressed is 1001MB... Maybe we should consider to create image files of 2GB or even bigger, considering that we are only

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1953005] Re: systemd autopkgtest failures on jammy 5.15 due to cgroup v2 ABI change

2022-01-16 Thread Andrea Righi
This failure isn't happening anymore, we can close this one. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951390] Re: update iproute2 in jammy

2022-01-05 Thread Andrea Righi
New iproute has been merged in jammy. We can close this. ** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951390] Re: update iproute2 in jammy

2022-01-05 Thread Andrea Righi
New iproute has been merged in jammy. We can close this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951390 Title: update iproute2 in jammy Status in iproute2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1953005] [NEW] systemd autopkgtest failures on jammy 5.15 due to cgroup v2 ABI change

2021-12-02 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: I'm getting the following errors when running systemd autopkgtest on the latest Jammy 5.15 Ubuntu kernel: Received SIGCHLD from PID 2674 (sh). Child 2674 (sh) died (code=killed, status=13/PIPE) exec-ignoresigpipe-no.service: Failed to read oom_kill field of memory.events

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951390] Re: update iproute2 in jammy

2021-11-18 Thread Andrea Righi
debdiff against Debian iproute2 5.15.0-1 (re-applied Ubuntu Fan driver). v2: added this tracking bug to the changelog entry. ** Patch added: "iproute2-update-to-5.15-v2.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951390] Re: update iproute2 in jammy

2021-11-18 Thread Andrea Righi
** Patch added: "iproute2-update-to-5.15.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1951390/+attachment/5541716/+files/iproute2-update-to-5.15.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951390] Re: update iproute2 in jammy

2021-11-18 Thread Andrea Righi
** Also affects: iproute2 (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951390 Title: update iproute2 in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951390] [NEW] update iproute2 in jammy

2021-11-18 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: Kernel 5.15 requires iproute2 at least v5.14 to properly support IPv6 In-situ OAM (IOAM6). This lack of support is also triggering the following kernel selftest failure: # selftests: net: ioam6.sh # SKIP: iproute2 too old, missing ioam command not ok 1 selftests: net:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949603] Re: iptables-save -c shows incorrect counters with iptables-nft

2021-11-15 Thread Andrea Righi
New debdiff with the enabled autopkgtest test case. (I'm assuming the Suggests: packages are installed when we run autopkgtest, so I'm not doing anything special to install nftables). ** Patch added: "iptables-nft-fix-counters-v2.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949603] Re: iptables-save -c shows incorrect counters with iptables-nft

2021-11-15 Thread Andrea Righi
Alright I figured out why the tests were failing, simply nftables wasn't installed in my test environment. I see that nftables is reported in the Suggests: list. @xnox IIRC we are installing all the suggests when we run the autotest, is it correct? -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949603] Re: iptables-save -c shows incorrect counters with iptables-nft

2021-11-12 Thread Andrea Righi
@xnox interestingly enough 2 tests are failing with nft and 1 test in legacy running `./run-tests.sh --host`: W: [FAILED] ././testcases/ipt-restore/0004-restore-race_0: expected 0 but got 1 ... I: legacy results: [OK] 49 [FAILED] 1 [TOTAL] 50 W: [FAILED]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949603] Re: iptables-save -c shows incorrect counters with iptables-nft

2021-11-12 Thread Andrea Righi
** Description changed: + [Impact] + Starting with Impish I noticed that the kernel selftest xfrm_policy.sh is always failing. Initially I thought it was a kernel issue, but debugging further I found that the reason is that with Impish we're using iptables-nft by default instead of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949603] Re: iptables-save -c shows incorrect counters with iptables-nft

2021-11-04 Thread Andrea Righi
** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949603] Re: iptables-save -c shows incorrect counters with iptables-nft

2021-11-03 Thread Andrea Righi
The debdiff in attach seems to solve the problem. Without this fix applied: $ sudo ./tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh PASS: policy before exception matches FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions) ... With this fix applied: $ sudo ./tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949603] Re: iptables-save -c shows incorrect counters with iptables-nft

2021-11-03 Thread Andrea Righi
FYI, I've tested the latest iptables from https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/ and the test passes also with iptables-nft. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949603] [NEW] iptables-save -c shows incorrect counters with iptables-nft

2021-11-03 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: Starting with Impish I noticed that the kernel selftest xfrm_policy.sh is always failing. Initially I thought it was a kernel issue, but debugging further I found that the reason is that with Impish we're using iptables-nft by default instead of iptables-legacy. This test

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943441] Re: lxc: lxc-test-parse-config-file failure

2021-09-13 Thread Andrea Righi
Makes sense, thanks for looking at this Christian! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943441 Title: lxc: lxc-test-parse-config-file failure Status in lxc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943441] [NEW] lxc: lxc-test-parse-config-file failure

2021-09-13 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: I'm getting the following error with the lxc kernel autotest on impish: 08:46:04 DEBUG| parse_config_file.c: 60: set_get_compare_clear_save_load: expected value "system_u:system_r:lxc_t:s0:c22" and retrieved value "" for config key "lxc.selinux.context" do not match

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938771] [NEW] lxc-test-rootfs test regression with 4.0.10-0ubuntu3

2021-08-03 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: It looks like the option "lxc.rootfs.options = ro" is not honored with lxc 4.0.10-0ubuntu3 and it used to work with lxc 4.0.6-0ubuntu1 (kernel is the same, I'm testing this with 5.13.0-13.13). Output of the test: 09:12 ubuntu@impish$ sudo ./src/tests/lxc-test-rootfs +

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931064] [NEW] lxc autotest failure with kernel >= 5.13

2021-06-06 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: The lxc autotest is failing with the following error(s) on the latest kernel linux-unstable 5.13: FAIL: lxc-tests: lxc-test-apparmor (1s) --- failed - opened /sys/kernel/uevent_helper --- PASS: lxc-tests: lxc-test-apparmor-generated (0s) PASS: lxc-tests:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923432] Re: apparmor-utils: missing CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE in /etc/apparmor/severity.db

2021-04-12 Thread Andrea Righi
New debdiff that contains a proper reference to the upstream patch. Thanks! ** Patch added: "apparmor-utils-support-cap-checkpoint-restore.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1923432/+attachment/5486963/+files/apparmor-utils-support-cap-checkpoint-restore.debdiff

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923432] Re: apparmor-utils: missing CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE in /etc/apparmor/severity.db

2021-04-12 Thread Andrea Righi
@sbeattie sorry I didn't notice your comment, I can post another debdiff that includes the proper upstream commit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923432

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923432] Re: apparmor-utils: missing CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE in /etc/apparmor/severity.db

2021-04-12 Thread Andrea Righi
** Patch added: "apparmor-utils-support-cap-checkpoint-restore.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1923432/+attachment/5486955/+files/apparmor-utils-support-cap-checkpoint-restore.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923432] [NEW] apparmor-utils: missing CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE in /etc/apparmor/severity.db

2021-04-12 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: It looks like /etc/apparmor/severity.db is missing the new capability CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE. This causes the following regression test failure: ERROR: capability CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE not found in severity.db make: *** [Makefile:81: check_severity_db] Error 1 This

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915779] [NEW] sudo: bad onwership of /usr/bin/sudo and /usr/lib/sudo/sudoers.so (2001:2501)

2021-02-15 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: After enabling the -proposed ppa in Hirsute (21.04) I'm getting the following error: ubuntu@hirsute:~$ sudo su - sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set ubuntu@hirsute:~$ ls -l /usr/bin/sudo -rwsr-xr-x 1 2001 2501 190952 Feb 10 11:42

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887397] Re: perf build broken after updating to bintuils 2.34.90.20200706-1ubuntu1

2020-07-13 Thread Andrea Righi
** Attachment added: "perf object files / build tree" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1887397/+attachment/5392329/+files/perf-build-fail.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887397] Re: perf build broken after updating to bintuils 2.34.90.20200706-1ubuntu1

2020-07-13 Thread Andrea Righi
Adding the specific command that is reporting error: gcc -Wbad-function-cast -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k -Winit-self -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wno-system-headers -Wold-style-definition -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887397] [NEW] perf build broken after updating to bintuils 2.34.90.20200706-1ubuntu1

2020-07-13 Thread Andrea Righi
Public bug reported: After updating to binutils 2.34.90.20200706-1ubuntu1 Linux' perf build is failing with the following error: /usr/bin/ld:/tmp/autopkgtest.440kEd/build.N7g/src/debian/build/tools-perarch/tools/lib/traceevent/plugins/libtraceevent-dynamic-list:2: ignoring invalid character `@'