** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Description changed:
During an archive rebuild, rsyslog FTBFS on s390x only:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/751879056/buildlog_ubuntu-
oracular-s390x.rsyslog_8.2406.0-1ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz
The build fails due to two tests:
FAIL: gzipwr_flushInterval
Ok, looking a bit more into this. Turns out there is a difference in the
s390x hardware between the LP builders and canonistack s390x VMs:
-features: esan3 zarch stfle msa ldisp eimm dfp edat etf3eh highgprs te vx
+features: esan3 zarch stfle msa ldisp eimm dfp edat etf3eh highgprs te vx
** Also affects: zlib (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: zlib (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Oracular)
I
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to heimdal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085235
Title:
Merge heim
This makes the test pass on s390x, and the build succeed:
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -87,5 +87,5 @@ override_dh_installinit:
override_dh_auto_test:
ifeq (, $(filter nocheck, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
- PATH=$$PATH:/usr/sbin dh_auto_test || ( cat tests/test-suite.log; exit
1 )
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083700 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083700
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2083700
rsyslog FTBFS (s390x only) against zlib 1:1.3.dfsg+really1.3.1-1ubuntu1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
To
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083700 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083700
See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/2083700/comments/2
for the difference that matters (in reply to comment #4 above).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Thanks, I'll add it to my batch of fixes for the upcoming stable release
update (SRU).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073628
Title:
imjournal module works
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Plucky)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076084
Title:
Addition
I branched oracular off of 0.102, pushed to upstream. Then I changed
oracular to plucky in d/changelog in ubuntu/master, tagged that as
0.103, and pushed upstream too. So now we have ubuntu/master tracking
plucky, with your 0.103 changes, and I sponsored that for plucky. Given
plucky is not yet ope
I'm learning with you here, Nathan. I'm asking around what's the
project's approach to creating new branches and such, because we need an
upstream branch for oracular now, so that ubuntu/master can become
plucky.
** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
** Also affects: alsa-utils (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: alsa-utils (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Ok, this bug snowballed. And it looked so easy :)
Disclaimer: I did review the branch for oracular, and thought this group
change was the final fix, but looks like it's not... See below.
a) The sasl2-bin postinst sets permissions on /run/saslauthd as follows:
# Create a statoverride for
I checked the build logs of boost1.83 on ppc64el and s390x and compared
1.83.0-2.1ubuntu3 with 1.83.0-2.1ubuntu3.1:
1.83.0-2.1ubuntu3: -fno-omit-frame-pointer seen
1.83.0-2.1ubuntu3.1: that flag was not present
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seede
sudo would definitely drop it, unless otherwise specified. mount with
nfs4 + krb5 keeps it, and I can see debugging information.
Just to be sure, start with setting that variable before running kinit,
just to confirm you would see the debug output.
--
You received this bug notification because y
From what I understand, the unprivileged_userns profile disables
capabilities:
$ cat /etc/apparmor.d/unprivileged_userns
# Special profile transitioned to by unconfined when creating an unprivileged
# user namespace.
#
abi ,
include
profile unprivileged_userns {
audit deny capability, <---
Hello @Kent,
thanks for the update, and the reproducer. I marked the bug as confirmed
now.
Could you please try this as a quick workaround:
- add these lines to the existing /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.rsyslogd file.
It is shipped empty, exactly to facilitate such local overrides/inclusions:
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028282
Title:
SSH pubkey authetication fails when GSSAPI enabled
Status in openssh package in U
>From https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3406#c8
Colin committed a fix[1] to debian salsa, and we should grab that as
well, and SRU this at first glance.
1.
https://salsa.debian.org/ssh-team/openssh/-/commit/7d291bb6319611a01dfa0f56fd161db11547320f
** Bug watch added: OpenSSH Portabl
It looks like libneon27 uses mit kerberos, so you can try exporting this
variable in the process's environment to see if you can get more logs:
KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stderr (or a file)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
The excuses page is clear for focal now.
https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#e2fsprogs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mesa has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a reg
The verification of the Stable Release Update for procps has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
I'm recording this comment just to show I saw this bug in my shift, but am not
taking any action on it:
- devel task is still "new", and oracular was released today. What's the status
in oracular+?
- there is no SRU template
- what's the test plan? The verification comment just says some build lo
** No longer affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu Jammy)
** No longer affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu Noble)
** No longer affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Noble)
** No longer affects: ubuntu-advantage-too
I couldn't reproduce the rsyslog build-time test failure in a s390x vm,
even one with 4 vcpus. The only difference between my test and the lp
builders would have been the kernel, since the build in lp happens in a
chroot with an older kernel as the base, not the oracular one.
--
You received this
I had filed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/2083526
previously, and I couldn't reproduce the build/test failures on a s390x
vm, just in a ppa.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in U
> Couldn't work out why they aren't updating automatically but manually
> installing the .debs shows the
> issue fixed, thanks!
Thanks Robert for your verification, but could you please expand on what
verification steps you actually performed, and with which package versions? The
instructions
> This I believe trigger a systemd-networkd restart
Do you have logs showing the link between dbus being updated and systemd
restarted?
Does something similar happen when you just reinstall dbus?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, w
I ran the gzip build-time tests on s390x, and nothing failed. Focusing
on rsyslog again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083526
Title:
FTBFS s390x: gzip: s
This is also affecting oracular:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/752391673/buildlog_ubuntu-
oracular-s390x.rsyslog_8.2406.0-1ubuntu3~ppa1_BUILDING.txt.gz
** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Un
> But perhaps /etc/ipa/ca.crt needs to be added to
> /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ssl_certs which is in the
> apparmor package.
@jjohansen, @georgiag, what do you think about the above suggestion?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
Perhaps related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076269
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083526
Title:
FTBFS s390x: gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--f
While preparing the SRU for noble, I noticed the build is failing on
s390x[1].
1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/2083526
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
Can you please check if there are any apparmor errors in the `sudo dmesg
-T` output with a timestamp that matches the rsyslog message where it
says it will create the journal_state file?
The current rules do allow creating files there, but maybe something is missing:
/var/spool/rsyslog/ r,
/va
Public bug reported:
Multiple build-time gzip tests are failing[1] on s390x only:
14:31:21[0] Test: ./gzipwr_flushInterval.sh
config rstb_615693_cea0d3b33SOB_.conf is:
1 module(load="../plugins/imdiag/.libs/imdiag")
2 globa
** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack)
** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
There is a dep8 test for saslauthd[1]. I didn't check if it caught this
failure, or if it didn't, why. I'm guessing because the test command
(testsaslauthd) is running as root in this test.
1.
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/tree/debian/tests/saslauthd?h=applied/ubuntu/noble
No idea what the alsa-driver task is about here, looks like it was a
mistake. Removing.
** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** No longer affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~enr0n/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+git/openssh/+merge/474189
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080216
Titl
Adjusting bug tasks: fixed in Oracular, needs fixing in Noble.
** Also affects: lxc (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: lxc (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => Fix Release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073552
Title:
Add SoundWire devices to alsa-info reported in ACPI
Status in alsa-utils package in Ubuntu:
New
Status i
The patch looks fine from a feature freeze point of view, but we are
very close to final freeze, and I would feel better sponsoring this if
it had approval from the release team. I left a comment in the PR, and
also it needs fixing for the oracular version.
--
You received this bug notification b
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mschiu77/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+git/alsa-utils/+merge/472762
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
The target of the linked pr is not a packaging branch, and this is not
yet merged into the upstream branch. I left a comment in the PR asking
for it to be merged or abandoned (it has two approvals already).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pack
Thanks for the patch. I have some questions and comments below.
a)
The profile file is /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.lxc-copy, which contains:
abi ,
#include
/usr/bin/lxc-start flags=(attach_disconnected) {
#include
}
There is an obvious name mismatch, but the thing is, the name of the file
do
I'll mark this bug as incomplete for now, pending answers to the
previous comment.
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
I triggered a migration-reference/0 run for the focal failed tests,
let's see the outcome in a few hours.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036467
Title:
R
I retried many autopkgtests just now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077290
Title:
[SRU] GLArea transparency broken
Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu:
This is the autopkgtest bug referred to by comment #11:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/2066290
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
** Description changed:
[Impact]
Incorrect ownership of files in saslauthd's run directory can result in
service issues (e.g. failure to authenticate, failure to restart, etc.)
[Workaround]
# systemctl edit saslauthd.service
Then, put the following lines inside the file:
-
Once troubleshooting finishes, please update the test case to cover what
was found. Although I suspect that would be done in the new bug, that
works too of course.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tool
Hello Dirk, or anyone else affected,
Accepted initramfs-tools into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.142ubuntu25.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Benjamin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted initramfs-tools into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.142ubuntu25.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new pack
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
This is a follow-up for bug #2065180 implementing the suggestion from
comment #44 there.
When compared to Ubuntu 23.10, creating intramfs files with update-
initramfs takes 2 to 5 times more time on ARM devices.
IIUC, dracut-install usage was
Thanks for the follow-up improvements.
I think, though, that they should be applied under a new bug, instead of
using this one here again. If we have to chase down future regressions,
or even just understand the history of these changes, that is already
becoming hard here, with over 70 comments an
The current apparmor profile for digikam in oracular has these rules:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/libexec/QtWebEngineProcess cx ->
&digikam//QtWebEngineProcess,
/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/qt5/libexec/QtWebEngineProcess cx ->
&digikam//QtWebEngineProcess,
/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/qt5/
I think this should be SRUed to noble, yes.
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078851
Title:
saslauthd wrong permission of /va
** Description changed:
# README first
- If you are hit by this bug, please check if your root user's environment
- has the "errors" variable set:
+
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/2078356/comments/62
+ has the details. If you are hit by this bug, please check
Oracular also affected, obviously:
Good case:
root@o-py3-errors:~# apt install --reinstall python3
Summary:
Upgrading: 0, Installing: 0, Reinstalling: 1, Removing: 0, Not Upgrading: 0
Download size: 0 B / 24.0 kB
Space needed: 0 B / 98.5 GB available
(Reading databas
Amazing find @theofficialgman!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078356
Title:
python3 preinst failure to run pre-rtupdate hooks
Status in python3-
This was fixed in
https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/heimdal/7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-8,
and we have 8ubuntu1 in oracular (with the fix too).
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Hello Nobuto, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/34~18.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Nobuto, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/34~16.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Nobuto, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/34~22.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Nobuto, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/34~20.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Nobuto, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/34~24.04 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
This migrated.
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075332
Title:
FTBFS wi
I just synced 2.1.28+dfsg1-8 from debian, which contains the fix.
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Tags added: bite-size
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Hello Ankush, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.4.13 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Te
I was able to reproduce this in jammy lxd VM, and tweaked the test plan
a bit.
I'm going to accept this into jammy-proposed in order to allow for
testing to begin quickly, but we still need the noble and oracular
uploads as well.
The APT noble test plan could also use some refinement, there are s
** Description changed:
(For APT SRU versioning, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates)
[Impact]
Obsolete packages can be removed despite still having reverse dependencies
installed, for example:
Now that 24.04.1 has been released, 22.04 users are encouraged to upgrade to
24.04 vi
** Description changed:
(For APT SRU versioning, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates)
[Impact]
Obsolete packages can be removed despite still having reverse dependencies
installed, for example:
Now that 24.04.1 has been released, 22.04 users are encouraged to upgrade to
24.04 vi
The verification of the Stable Release Update for initramfs-tools has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you enc
This failed to build on arm64, whereas the previous version built, so
it's a regression. Can somebody troubleshoot that failure please? Seems
like a build-time test failure, so for now I triggered a new build
attempt.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
We tried multiple things to reproduce this bug, to no avail.
My last attempt was to inject an actual error in one of the
/usr/share/python3/runtime.d/*.rtupdate scripts to see how the upgrade (or
reinstall) would behave, and it does as expected:
Preparing to unpack .../python3_3.12.3-0ubuntu2_am
Thanks for reporting this.
Can you please run these commands and show the output:
apt-cache policy asymptote python3 python3-minimal
dpkg -L asymptote
sudo apt -f install
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
** Description changed:
+ # README first
+
+ If you are hit by this bug, please provide the information asked in the
+ comment
+
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/2078356/comments/53
+ further down in this page, thanks
+
+
+ [ Original Description ]
+
running p
> This bug has now affected (infected?) my third server which is running
22.04.4.
Could you please get me the information from comment #53 about that
system?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Potential regression-update in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/2078356
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075337
Title:
[SRU
I'm gonna tag this with regression-update, even though it's not yet
clear what is going on, but clearly it is affecting some users (bug heat
is 28 at the moment).
Potential regression-update of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/2075337
** Tags added: regression-updat
I tried even an ubuntu desktop, I still cannot reproduce this.
To those affected, please provide the output of these commands, if you
haven't already:
- apt-cache policy python3 libpython3-stdlib python3-gdbm python3-lib2to3
python3-minimal
- locale
- dpkg -S /usr/share/python3/runtime.d/*
- cat
** Summary changed:
- python3 upgrade has unmet dependencies
+ python3 preinst failure to run pre-rtupdate hooks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2078356 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078356
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2078356
python3 upgrade has unmet dependencies
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is sub
It doesn't look like it's the update itself, because as can be seen in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/2078356/comments/33,
reinstalling the non-update version also triggered it.
I'm starting to think it could be one of the
/usr/share/python3/runtime.d/*.rtupdate sc
You don't have /var/log/apt/history.log nor /var/log/apt/term.log? Just
the rotated .1 versions?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078356
Title:
pyt
Oh, and /var/log/dpkg.log too please
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078356
Title:
python3 upgrade has unmet dependencies
Status in python3-defau
Ok, maybe the script is being called with redirection to a log file.
That doesn't explain why you didn't have the script in place, but let's
check some logs.
Could you please attach the following to this bug:
/var/log/apt/*.log
/var/log/syslog
output of "dmesg -T"
--
You received this bug noti
It's just not being executed, because we are not seeing the "set -x"
output (which would be very noisy).
Did you do something different to this system that you can recall?
Install python from source, or packages from debian instead of ubuntu,
or anywhere else? That kind of thing?
--
You received
And there is no /var/lib/dpkg/info/python3.preinst now?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078356
Title:
python3 upgrade has unmet dependencies
Stat
We should reinstall python3 to get things back to what they were, as
much as possible.
Run:
sudo apt install --reinstall python3=3.12.3-0ubuntu1
And then, leave the system as is if there are no further errors. Maybe
tomorrow someone has another idea to try.
--
You received this bug notificat
ok, well, that's good. Means there is this fallback that works. I still
don't know why the upgrade failed for you.
What does /var/lib/dpkg/info/python3.preinst look like now?
ls -la /var/lib/dpkg/info/python3.preinst
cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/python3.preinst
--
You received this bug notificati
The "-s" was a simulation :)
I wanted to check which packages would be downgraded, and the list looks
correct.
So let's try it without the -s:
sudo apt install python3-minimal=3.12.3-0ubuntu1
libpython3-stdlib=3.12.3-0ubuntu1 python3=3.12.3-0ubuntu1
--
You received this bug notification becaus
What's the output of this command:
sudo apt install -s python3-minimal=3.12.3-0ubuntu1
libpython3-stdlib=3.12.3-0ubuntu1 python3=3.12.3-0ubuntu1
This would be a revert attempt to the previous version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packag
I'm baffled, you clearly have python3 installed, but no
/var/lib/dpkg/info/python3.preinst and you had to create it by hand?
What do you get with this:
ls -la /var/lib/dpkg/info/python3*preinst
And this:
py3versions -i
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
> N: Unable to locate package python3-mininal
Sorry, that was a typo on my part, it should have been python3-minimal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
> Okay, created the file /var/lib/dpkg/info/python3.preinst and executed
it.
No, you shouldn't have done that.
If you had to create it, something else is very wrong on your system.
That comes from the python3 debian package.
Did you manage to check what I asked in comment #14 above?
--
You rec
> That script does not exist on my system.
(/var/lib/dpkg/info/python3.preinst)
Huh, that's unexpected.
Do you have the python3 package installed?
dpkg -l python3 python3-minimal
apt-cache policy python3 python3-mininal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Sorry, I should have been more clear.
If you are willing to help debug this further, then please add "set -x"
just below the existing "set -e" in /var/lib/dpkg/info/python3.preinst
and then run "sudo apt -f install" again. It should output a lot more
debugging information.
After that, you can und
1 - 100 of 1058 matches
Mail list logo
