** Tags removed: neutron-proactive-backport-potential
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622002
Title:
dhcp_release6 can be called when it is not present
Sta
** Tags added: neutron-proactive-backport-potential
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622002
Title:
dhcp_release6 can be called when it is not present
Statu
I think it was fixed in Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732410
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #732410
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732410
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whic
** Tags removed: newton-rc-potential
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622002
Title:
dhcp_release6 can be called when it is not present
Status in neutron:
Right, we need the dhcp_release6 tool in xenial dnsmasq package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622002
Title:
dhcp_release6 can be called when it is not p
Actually, the impact here is actually making allocation reloading
completely broken for dhcpv6-stateful networks, something that was not
completely clear to me until I read the code.
I actually now prefer we get it in rc2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
btw this bug suggests that we don't have a tempest scenario that would
mess with ipv6 leases for stateful subnets.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622002
Tit
I suggest we don't modify API behaviour based on broken agent setup. It
would require a lot of coordination... for what? Setups are not supposed
to be broken, we should rely on runtime deps being installed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pack
Fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/366291/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622002
Title:
dhcp_release6 can be called when it is not present
Status in n
I added Ubuntu dnsmasq package to affected projects to raise visibility
around missing dependency for OpenStack Neutron in Xenial dnsmasq
package.
** Also affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
10 matches
Mail list logo
