This problem still exists on binutils 2.33 when -fvisibility=hidden is
passed to cflags. I imagine this is so due to some conflicting code
where the forced B.W is only generated for static functions, since non-
static ones will be relocated differently, but then because of
-fvisibility=hidden, they
Tracking the new bug here now:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26141
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725126
Title:
gas may assemble b to lo
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
This was reported to oss-security and to secur...@ubuntu.com, but I
figure I should make a real bug report, as otherwise it'll probably be
missed. Original post from https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-
security/2020/08/03/
Looks like this has come up before in other utilities and was fixed,
such as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-
files/+bug/1649352 .
** Summary changed:
- ansi escape sequence injection into add-apt-repository
+ ansi escape sequence injection in add-apt-repository
--
You received
I'm not convinced that really cuts it. Namely, from the diff:
-print(" %s" % (info["description"] or ""))
+# strip ANSI escape sequences
+description = re.sub(r"(\x9B|\x1B\[)[0-?]*[ -/]*[@-~]",
+ "", info["description"] or "")
+
+print("
You might be right that the remaining ones that slip through your regex
are mere "nuisance"s. But you know how those things go - one man's
nuisance is another man's vuln. Some of those, anyhow, are implemented
by the Linux console driver.
Why not just take the tried and true "safe" route, as imple
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I believe your assessment is
correct. Do you know which Ubuntu first started using resolved? How far
back do we need to make changes?
There are two facets of this:
1) The Ubuntu systemd package should install the resolvconf
compatibility symlink. I have n
> wireguard package => please feed DNS data direct to systemd-resolved
using either dbus or the cli.
Absolutely not. We're not going to add vendor-specific hacks for broken
distros that are unable to include the standard interface for this kind
of thing, resolvconf(8). This is a pretty clear case
By the way, Arch manages the possibility of openresolv colliding with
systemd's resolvconf by providing a package called "systemd-resolvconf":
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/systemd-resolvconf/
https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-
packages/blob/packages/systemd/trunk/PKGBUILD#L239
** Changed in: wireguard (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892798
Title:
systemd package missing resolvconf(8
Your four appended comments are super full of just plain wrong
information. I'll try to unpack these all piecemeal:
> Ubuntu/Debian has never used openresolv
This is not the case. Ubuntu and Debian have provided openresolv for a
very long time, and resolvconf has mostly been an unmaintained mess.
I think he meant to post this on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireguard/+bug/1950317
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892798
Title:
systemd pac
It might make more sense to simply switch to using openresolv, which is
a proper resolvconf implementation, which doesn't rely on this silly
hard-coded list. Alternatively, you could just backport features one by
one from openresolv, such as '-m 0 and '-x'.
But really, since openresolv has no down
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu relies on Debian's own "resolvconf" which is vastly inferior to
Openresolv and makes it impossible to securely set up DNS servers for
ephemeral secure tunnel interfaces.
Specifically, Debian's "resolvconf" relies on a hard coded list of
interface templates. For virtual
14 matches
Mail list logo
