Łukasz, thank you very much for accepting the package into bionic-
proposed. I confirm that the updated binary package libqt5printsupport5
fixes the problem. I also updated other libqt5* packages available in
bionic-proposed, and did not notice any obvious regressions.
However, I would like to voi
I can confirm that the patch fixes the problem, i.e. Qt print dialog now
defaults to page size as set in System Settings Printers applet. To apply the
fix, it was enough to add the PPA repository, upgrade libqt5printsupport5
package, and then close and reopen applications that were affected by t
Public bug reported:
Please backport Qt patch 213677 to qtbase-opensource-src
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/213677
In Qt5 applications, print dialog (Printer Properties) always defaults
to A4 paper size, even when Letter is set as a default in all system and
KDE preferences. Aft
I am also affected by this issue. In my case both network.target and
network-online.target are reached too early, which results in sssd and
autofs to start before network interfaces are up; autofs then fails to
obtain mount maps and does not attempt to retry; it is necessary to
restart autofs manua
It appears that GnuTLS initialization is failing with an error, perhaps because
there is something in your slapd configuration that newer version of GnuTLS (in
xenial) does not like.
Can you post your slapd config? Please redact it so that it does not contain
any host names, IP addresses, user n
I can confirm that the following packages from xenial-proposed fix the bug:
slapd 2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu3.1
libldap-2.4-2 2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu3.1
ldap-utils 2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu3.1
I did not test the packages in wily-proposed. Setting the test
environment is not trivial, and I don't think it is worthwh
Chris, thank you very much for preparing the packages for -proposed
repos. I started testing of xenial-proposed version, but tests are not
progressing quickly, due to issues that I described above. In addition I
have run into another problem, likely unrelated to this bug, which is
further obscuring
Due to the nature of this bug (referencing previously freed memory
leading to an undefined behavior), a reliable testing procedure is
difficult to create. This bug was originally found by looking for a
cause of syncrepl failures. The reproducibility of these failures was
about 50%, enough to make s
I reported the bug to Debian:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820244
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #820244
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820244
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which i
I created patched openldap packages for xenial, available on the same
PPA as above. I tested amd64 packages on xenial beta 2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
I created a PPA with patched openldap packages for wily and xenial. If
you would like to test them, there is more information in bug 1557248.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
I have just found that Howard Chu of OpenLDAP team had already uploaded this
patch to Launchpad VCS:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/openldap/master/revision/20757
Hopefully we will have the package released soon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Tags added: patch-accepted-upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1557248
Title:
OpenLDAP: Backport a fix for use-after-free in GnuTLS-related code
S
I created a PPA with patched deb packages, available at:
https://launchpad.net/~maciej-puzio/+archive/ubuntu/openldap
Currently it contains openldap-2.4.41 source package with the above patch
applied, as well as binary debs built from it, for amd64 and i386. These
packages are for Ubuntu 15.10
Patch created by OpenLDAP team applies cleanly to openldap 2.4.41+dfsg-
1ubuntu2 (wily).
** Patch added: "tls_g.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1557248/+attachment/4607004/+files/tls_g.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
A bug has been found in libldap code that interferes with the value of
"require cert" option. It affects libldap built with GnuTLS, as is done
in packages supplied by Ubuntu and Debian. The bug causes the value to
be read from previously freed memory, often resulting in incorrect or
random value be
Perhaps the issue is that your certificates have too short RSA keys. In
GnuTLS SECURE256 requires at least 3072-bit public key. Unfortunately,
this is not clearly documented.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ope
Public bug reported:
May I ask that you backport an upstream patch that resolves the issue of
use-after-free in libldap that interferes with syncrepl, causing
failures and segfaults.
OpenLDAP commit: 283f3ae1713df449cc170965b311b19157f7b7ea
Link:
http://www.openldap.org/devel/gitweb.cgi?p=openld
The same problem exists on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Trusty). In this case, add-
apt-repository is in package software-properties-common, which depends
on python3-software-properties, which depends (needlessly) on
unattended-upgrades.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
For a similar bug affecting Ubuntu 14.04, please see bug #1371564
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mountall in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525154
Title:
mountall for /var or other nfs mount races
20 matches
Mail list logo
