Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1415135
Title:
lost audio control settings afterupgrade from
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1414295
Title:
,
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug
See especially the following lines from your logs:
[ 3373.532443] Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error - auto reallocate failed
[ 3373.532447] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] CDB:
[ 3373.532450] Read(10): 28 00 00 69 90 48 00 00 08 00
[ 3373.532464] end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 6918221
[ 3373.532496]
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Reviewing your dmesg attachment to this bug report it
seems that there may be a problem with your hardware. I'd recommend
performing a back up and then investigating the situation. Measures you
might take
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413868
Title:
won't update
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1413868 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413868
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1413868
won't update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
The issue seems be resolved for me in Lubuntu 14.10.
On Wed Jan 21 2015 at 2:01:06 PM Andy Somerville andy.somervi...@gmail.com
wrote:
@r0lf this is still happening in 14.10/Utopic should it be reopened
there?
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
This happened because your i386 version of the library and your amd64
version of the library are out of sync. I don't know why you have both
installed, but if you can uninstall one that you don't need, that can
help. Chances are good your mirror will be updated Soon Enough, and re-
running apt-get
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411390
Title:
help me
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
New
There are significant problems with the configurations of both sites:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=tm3.com
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=ws.myfax.com
That said, I was able to establish a connection to both sites by
manually requesting SSL3 on the command line:
This error message usually happens when the i386 and amd64 portions of a
mirror aren't in perfect sync; by the time you next run apt-get update
apt-get upgrade the lists are usually in sync again, and the upgrade
will proceed.
Depending upon the mirror you're using, this might take an hour or it
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409646
Title:
extended display
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409460
Title:
Boot Problems
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to avahi in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409872
Title:
avahi-0.6.31 doesn't pass Apple conformance test
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404462
Title:
black screen
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
I believe this error message means that you need to upgrade your i386
and amd64 versions of this library in lockstep. Probably trying again
will fix it, if it hasn't already been fixed.
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404567
Title:
Catalyst
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
New
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405053
Title:
package systemd 208-8ubuntu8.1 failed to
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to language-pack-gnome-pt-
base in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407312
Title:
package
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see
I'd be very surprised if this report is related to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1397065 -- it just looks like the same
symptoms but not cause. (/etc/services isn't mentioned in the other
report, and no upstart service dependency loop is reported here.)
Check dmesg output; there may be
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406268
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407019
Title:
bugs
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug
AppArmor doesn't assign ACLs; this task was part of udev, now part of
systemd.
http://sources.debian.net/src/systemd/208-8/src/udev/udev-builtin-
uaccess.c/?hl=71#L71
** Package changed: apparmor (Ubuntu) = systemd (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: unity
Status: Incomplete = New
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108348
Andrea, the URGENT flag still doesn't work in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Unity. I
haven't upgraded to 14.10 yet
** Tags removed: quantal
** Tags added: trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
^G is the ascii BEL character; most terminals will pass that along to
X11 as an URGENT flag.
$ ascii bel
ASCII 0/7 is decimal 007, hex 07, octal 007, bits 0111: called ^G, BEL
Official name: Bell
C escape: '\a'
Other names: Alert
From urxvt(1):
urgentOnBell: boolean
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
** Package changed: apport (Ubuntu) = eclipse (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1402972
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
This looks roughly like you've got both amd64 and i386 versions of this
library installed; they should be updated in lockstep should you wish to
keep them both.
Thanks
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
** Changed in: jasper (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
It would be helpful to have the error messages.
Thanks
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1398458
Title:
kernel fails to load iwlwifi firmware
I used https://github.com/mcgrof/fake-firmware-test to confirm that
disabling CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER eliminates use of the user helper
and the associated delay when the firmware is missing. Patch has been
sent to the kernel team mailing list.
--
You received this bug notification because
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
If you're going to bodge this with a wrapper script, a better choice
would address the constant network monitoring performed in whoopsie by
using the assume-online command line option.
I don't know the whoopsie codebase but based on a quick reading it looks
like the only real downside to this
Public bug reported:
The comment at the top of tunables/global says:
# All the tunables definitions that should be available to every profile
# should be included here
But not all defined variables are included:
$ grep include global
# should be included here
#include tunables/home
#include
Mike, the number of reports of this kind of behaviour have dropped
dramatically since this update was released; my first thought is that
perhaps the computer hasn't been rebooted since
7.2.3+14.04.20140826-0ubuntu1.0.1 was installed, and an older version
was still running.
Do you know if the
still just work, but potentially there are some corner
cases which still rely on the fallback.
In the end I guess we probably ought to change it though.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Seth Forshee
It looks like I don't have any of the affected hardware. I put up a test
build at the link below; Sebastien, could you give it a try (with the
workaround removed obviously) and confirm that it fixes the problem?
Note especially the following lines from your dmesg:
[14616.756770] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
[14616.756774] ata1.00: error: { UNC }
[14616.759987] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100
[14616.760006] ata1: EH complete
[14620.761903] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
I believe Unity is responsible for the locking here; can you please run
apport-collect 1398498 to get whatever information might be collected
for unity bugs? Thanks
** Package changed: compiz (Ubuntu) = unity (Ubuntu)
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
I was able to verify the trust path entirely by hand, starting with the
http://pl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/Release and
http://pl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/Release.gpg files,
downloading the precise amd64 lame package, and verifying that the
sha256 for the downloaded
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to eglibc in Ubuntu.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393612
Title:
Protect against BadUSB device
Status
Sadly, the solution is not easy nor obvious. Ubuntu is used in a wide
variety of different ways and many of them do not lend themselves well
to just popping up a dialog box.
Furthermore, the problem is not at all restricted to just devices that
can be reprogrammed to act like keyboards.
A fairly
It looks like apparmor isn't allowing the mount.
[ 7963.575900] audit: type=1400 audit(1416145652.685:70):
apparmor=DENIED operation=mount info=failed mntpnt match error=-13
profile=/usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm-guest-session
name=/run/user/127/gvfs/ pid=7101 comm=gvfsd-fuse fstype=fuse
.gvfsd-fuse
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Note from your bootlog that you have some apparmor policy errors:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/189391868/BootLog.txt
Your /etc/apparmor.d/tunables/home file should be owned by root with
group root and permissions 0644.
You may need to customize the contents some, here's mine:
#
This bug affects me. And it is very annoying.
Yesterday, this bug acted different. When I went to login, the user
name was root, which I was not logged in as.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319829
Title:
aa-genprof will crash when
http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2393-1
** Changed in: wget (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wget in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386711
Title:
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1388336
Title:
Browser is disabled easily
Status in “xorg”
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1388962
Title:
Black screen
Status in “xorg” package in Ubuntu:
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294797
Title:
aa-genprof traceback with
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1382559 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1382559
Thanks Michael and Christian; the intention is that connecting via adb
will require the screen to be unlocked.
Thanks
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1382559
adbd does not check the
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity8 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1384419
Title:
com.canonical.UnityGreeter.HideGreeter
Bib, I'm not saying that this bug is incorrect.
I'm saying that these patches are insecure and should not be used:
http://michael.orlitzky.com/code/releases/tar-1.27.1-gpcc.patch
http://michael.orlitzky.com/code/releases/coreutils-8.22-gpcc.patch
Do not use those patches. They are unsafe.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Frédéric, note that the 'owner' keyword means that the user running the
program must also own the file; with most files in /usr/ being owned by
root, this addition would only work if you're running Firefox as root.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
Stay away from the patches provided in the linked email; I suspect the
person who put it together does not regularly receive files named foo ;
rm -rf ~ from his friends.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
This is working as expected.
Some people even stick files named e.g. --interactive into their
directories to use this as some kind of defense against accidental
deletion.
Most programs provide a -- command line option that says further
arguments should be interpreted as files. But this kind of
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Unmarking as a duplicate, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/gnome-desktop3/+bug/1377847/comments/7 for details.
In the other bug I had mentioned that 'xset 500 ' worked fine
to turn off my screen as I want.
Thanks
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1377847
It'd be nice to track down which library call wants this so we can
better figure an abstraction to add this to.. (it might just belong in
abstractions/base if it is common enough.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
Can you please add an attachment:
grep DEN /var/log/syslog
This should capture AppArmor denied messages, it's my hunch there are
some missing rules.
Thanks
** Tags added: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see
With the prefix+suffix patches, this can no longer be exploited across
privilege boundaries; we'll likely include these fixes at some point in
the future but don't consider them a pressing issue any longer. For more
details please see our CVE tracker: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-
Also, please, no one ever run any command along the line of curl foo |
bash -- a malicious web server could easily give some friendly-looking
content to a web browser but malware payload to curl.
Download the script, read the script, validate published signatures, and
only then execute the script
Public bug reported:
I left my laptop open and running tonight when away. When I returned 1.5
hours later, my screen was still on, all black except for a white mouse
pointer.
I locked the screen with the windows+L combo and walked away when the
lock screen displayed properly.
The Brightness
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
There are any number of ways to get a privileged shell from a system
when physically present at booting. The important part is that your data
is still encrypted without the keys.
Thanks
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification
Since you put this into complain mode, there may be more entries needed
that might have been logged with ALLOWED -- can you grep for those, too,
please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
ubuntu@server-a41d04fd-0554-47fb-be87-04c9e54db176:~$ dpkg -l file | cat
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Are you confident your ufw firewall rules aren't blocking your attempts
to use dhcp?
Thanks
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in
Looks like we may need to adjust apparmor policy lines too. I wonder
what motivated the path change.
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security
** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because
Browsers are special. We certainly don't have the resources to fix only
security issues found in the browsers as we do with most other packages.
We package what upstream produces and this is far from the first thing
they've moved: the name of the sandbox executable has changed three or
four times
Thomas, I'm not sure about your test -- there is a /bin/echo in the
filesystem (from the coreutils package) so checking for a file named
'echo' in that directory is not indicative of any attack. I suspect you
also have a /root/echo file, perhaps left over from earlier testing. If
you do, please
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Looks vaguely like you've got both i386 and amd64 versions of libnss3
installed and only tried to upgrade the amd64 version for a security
update...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nss in Ubuntu.
1601 - 1700 of 1771 matches
Mail list logo
