> If you know of specific problems with it, we can best help you (and
all other Ubuntu users) if you give us bug reports for those problems.
There's this: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5755
Also, systemd-resolved does not have an equivalent of dnsmasq's "all-
servers" option, which
In this systemd github issue
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5755 in particular is
problematic darkstar states "the DNS servers are supposed to be exactly
equivalent". But as far as I can tell systemd doesn't have any provision
for temporarily falling back to a different nameserver if
> Can you help me understand the motivation underlying the requirement?
The motivation is that if the current dns server goes down, we don't
have to wait for the request to timeout and make another request to the
next server. Before resolved this was more of a problem since libc would
always try
> If there are scenarios where it is not appropriate to run resolved, then we
should absolutely evaluate those and determine how they should be supported
in Ubuntu.
Maybe there is a better way to do this, but here is my situation. I need
to be able to send DNS queries to multiple dns servers
4 matches
Mail list logo
