** Branch unlinked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/disable-statesaver-
from-urihandler
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to content-hub in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429899
Title:
StateSaver should
Ken, let's do this with launching the app with some argument (e.g. --no-
restore-state) rather than url_dispatch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to content-hub in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429899
Can we get the screenshots attached as well?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1430833
Title:
obscured history and copy/paste dialogs when tap on
I need more details on this: was this also happening on RTM (Qt 5.3.x)?
Or only on Vivid (Qt 5.4)? Had there be any changes in the way
ContentHub invokes Application (i.e. not thru UriHandler, the URI is
passed over the application later than it si launched, etc).
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429899
Title:
StateSaver should
Public bug reported:
When CheckBox is resized to be smaller than the default size, it does
not clip the tick mark.
** Affects: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Status: In Progress
** Branch linked: lp:~fboucault/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/checkbox_clipping_fix
--
You
The content width/height should ideally be clamped to the maximum screen
size minus some margin value. Instead of adding more properties aliased
from the content itself, it would be wiser to expose that component
through a property so developers can configure the content item freely.
** Tags
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Christian Dywan (kalikiana)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you
Thanks Nekhelesh for reporting this, however this most likely will make
it to UITK 1.3.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Zsombor Egri (zsombi)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Tim Peeters (tpeeters)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you
For me an API simulation should be provided by the same package which
brings the SD Card functionality. Toolkit provides CPOs for each - well,
almost - component we create.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you
I think this will be lot easier once the new cursor handler will be in
use.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Christian Dywan (kalikiana)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Loïc Molinari (loic.molinari)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Critical
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification
To handle this in SDK we would need to have a separate PasswordField
component, which can have the design requested functionality in case
that is different from the one provided by Qt TextInput.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in:
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Zsombor Egri (zsombi)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Critical
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical = High
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu
** Branch unlinked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/02-styleset
** Branch linked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/01-multiple-theme-engines
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
I think we already have a bug logged for this, must check it...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtdeclarative-opensource-
src in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407725
Title:
Tap vs. drag threshold
That behavior can be seen in many other cases when you simply use a
ListView without any PullToRefresh. That is somehow related to the
Header functionality, so I forward this to Tim.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Tim Peeters (tpeeters)
** Changed in:
Please, give us the exact logs what are the failures, with chronological
proof that those started to fail. The last UITK release on Vivid was on
6th of February 2015, so tests failing before and after should be the
same.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
I think we should extend these to be used also on unit tests. We do not
run those as we do not have OSK on desktop environments. I think it
would be worth having those there as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1427534
Title:
Prepare UI Toolkit
** Branch unlinked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/release-uitk-12
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1427534
Title:
Prepare UI Toolkit documentatiuon
Public bug reported:
Bump the version of the documentation to 1.2 and move all unstable
declared components to stable section.
** Affects: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical
Assignee: Zsombor Egri (zsombi)
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification
of the parent
(i.e. Label)
** Affects: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical
Assignee: Zsombor Egri (zsombi)
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1427117
Title:
MainView does not
Won't fix as the new ListItem brings a different approach, as requested
by design.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
We decided that we will not make any common layouts for the ListItems.
Every application will have to create their layouts or use some common
components module to define layouts if needed, depending on the
performance requirements.
** Branch unlinked:
This might be caused either by the same regression as in bug #1401883,
or because the app does not handle the switch state after the alarm
updates.
** Also affects: ubuntu-clock-app (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1426361
Title:
Alarms API should
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Zsombor Egri (zsombi)
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Branch unlinked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/100-listlayout
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-system-settings-
online-accounts in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194844
Title:
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1401883
Title:
** Branch unlinked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/83-dragging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195353
Title:
SDK should provide support to
We would need this functionality to be available when dragging
ListItems, to avoid header interference.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1424592
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1424592
Title:
Header needs locked and
As discussed, all warnings will be reported in error string, as well as
logged to the screen if an env variable is set. The ServiceProperties
status will reflect the connection status still, so missing properties
can be detected with (status == Active error !== ) sequence.
** Changed in:
I've moved the test under exceptions, so it runs now. Therefore I'll
rename this bug to be related to DatePicker once we arrive to that
component refactoring.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
** Summary changed:
- Qt5.4 UI-Toolkit Error: 2
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Zsombor Egri (zsombi)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Zsombor Egri (zsombi)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Tim Peeters (tpeeters)
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Unfortunately there's no better way to detect in what context the label
is used, is it in a popover or not. Perhaps a better solution would be
to get subtheming to solve this. The new ListItem brings more
flexibility and this and almost all components from the
Ubuntu.Components.ListItems module
I think this goes more to the qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu package rather
than the UI Toolkit itself.
** Also affects: qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug
I've assigned the bug to QtMir, as this is not a toolkit bug.
** Also affects: qtmir (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Tim Peeters (tpeeters)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
As both ListViews use the same model, you must disable the one from
page0, otherwise they both will control the header.
And probably you could use UbuntuListView, which has a built-in
PullToRefresh control.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Zsombor Egri (zsombi)
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1357548
Title:
[toolkit] Empty
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Christian Dywan (kalikiana)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Tim Peeters (tpeeters)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Christian Dywan (kalikiana)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404642
Title:
Broken Tutorial Link
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Zsombor Egri (zsombi)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Tags added: inverse-mouse-area
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
I'd rather have some hints than bouncing. You can have actions on both
leading and trailing side, and bouncing each time you open a page with
such a view, bouncing an item on both sides would be bad UX.
Perhaps a visual clue on the edges when the user taps on the component
could indicate that
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Christian Dywan (kalikiana)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Never the less we must check this behavior in Panel.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Tim Peeters (tpeeters)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
What Gerry is talking about - afaik - is the one apps should specify in
the desktop file, which is about to land in Vivid. However, the feature
Michael is talking about is more runtime one, for which we do not have
API yet to connect to.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status:
Michael, could you provide a small sample app which reproduces this?
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Tim Peeters (tpeeters)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are
The text selection is made programatically by the WebBrowser, and the
context menu appears right after the click happens over the refresh
button.
The failure happens only on AP tests, we could not reproduce it
manually.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
It's easy, simply resize the app window so that width height :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416408
Title:
Dialog shouldn't allow
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1415023
Title:
sim unlock/lock
In the sample posted by Jonas I do not see any command to dismiss the
dialog when the button is pressed. A call to PopupUtils.close(dialogue)
- (or depending on the code a dialogue.hide()) should be there,
otherwise the Dialog won't know when to close.
--
You received this bug notification
If you had this in the system settings, then it's bad, and I am
wondering how this worked so far. If it ever did work properly. See
https://developer.ubuntu.com/api/qml/sdk-14.10/Ubuntu.Components.Popups.Dialog/
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
I don't get the problem: Checkbox size is set to be 3/3 GU, and Switch
to 6/3 GU (width/height). So it definitely scales with the GU size.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
Ok, Arale has Vivid, Krillin has RTM. There was a bug filed for the
Switch/Checkbox design, which was fixed in Vivid only. Perhaps we should
port that bug back to Krillin so they both will look smaller.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Also affects: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM)
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Christian Dywan (kalikiana)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Zsombor Egri (zsombi)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu
Kevin, Pat, the UITK fix [1] wasn't planned for RTM (UITK v1.1) but for
Vivid (UITK 1.2) as it introduces a brand new component. The fix is
based on a major UbuntuShape refactoring [2], and needs smoke tested.
However, we can redirect both MPs to land in UITK 1.1, RTM in case this
is so urgent.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Sheldon (michael-sheldon)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1378823
Title:
apparmor
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Christian Dywan (kalikiana)
--
You received this bug notification because
If you destroy the item before the animation would complete, you would
not see any animation, right? That's why - even the new ListItem -
triggers the actions only after the snap animation is completed.
OTOH, the deletion animation should not be part of the ListItem, but
whould be implemented
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Zsombor Egri (zsombi)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM)
Status: New = In Progress
** Branch linked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui
We would need a sample code that reproduces the issue. I tried to
reproduce it myself with the UI Toolkit Gallery, and I couldn't manage
to.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Checking how the type is exported - and all related types to that one -
I see a potential bug in UITK. The way is exported to 1.1 version is
wrong:
qmlRegisterTypeQSortFilterProxyModelQML(uri, 1, 1,
SortFilterModel);
And it should be
qmlRegisterTypeQSortFilterProxyModelQML, 1(uri, 1, 1,
Omer, as long as we get green light to land it, we will.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380766
Title:
revert listitem dividers to previous (no
Importance set to Medium as it only affects ListItems when custom
delegate is used to visualise actions.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1403005
This is caused by the parent not being available during creation. The
question is why it does not warn on first delegate creation, only after
each consecutive ones?
The bigger problem is that anchors.verticalCenter: parent ?
parent.verticalCenter : undefined binding doesn't help.
** Changed in:
To be honest, removal animations should be handled on ListView level,
that has animations for these purposes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
Hopefully the new ListItem will solve this issue for you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276118
Title:
List Item onItemRemoved signal should
Fixed indirectly
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289332
Title:
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1274140
Title:
Swipe delete labels
Need resources to be able to maintain a to be deprecated component set.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
** Branch unlinked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/110-captions
** Branch linked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/listitem-master
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Actually you are right, and there's hop need for any kind of
highlightPolicy to be present, as we can detect whether an action is
attached to a ListItem, i.e has clicked or pressAndHold connected to a
slot. So in that sense the bug is valid.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1399025
Title:
new ListItem click
** Branch unlinked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/95-action-property
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1399025
Title:
new ListItem click does not
** Tags added: desing-sync
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1372563
Title:
[sdk] Checkbox in ListItem missing haptic response
Status in Ubuntu UX
** Branch linked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/95-action-property
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1362305
Title:
Listitems without actions
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1362305
Title:
Listitems without
This is a bit contradicting to the new design, where controls placed in
a list item should not toggle or be activated if pressed outside of the
control. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1372563
The new ListItem will implement the press/longpress separation more
properly, meaning if
Because it has been requested like that to be. The docs say (somewhere
in #95 at highlightPolicy) that no highlight in case there's no
leading/trailing actions list, or action attached, or there's no active
component in the list item. No highlight also means no
click/pressAndHold.
Bug #1362305
The new ListItem can operate on this, however needs 1.2 imports, which
is yet in unstable state. AFAIK the apps linked are not using the
toolkit's list items, thus for RTM and OTA-1, their fix must be
proprietary one. Depending which OTA will take Vivid, this can be ported
to use teh new ListItem
** Branch linked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/listitem-master
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1372592
Title:
[SDK] Popover thindivider visible
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Zsombor Egri (zsombi) = Christian Dywan (kalikiana)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376510
** Branch linked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/95-action-property
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
601 - 700 of 781 matches
Mail list logo
