[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038892] Re: How To Contact +1(202-960-2084) McAfee Customer Service Number?

2023-10-10 Thread William Grant
** Package changed: cups (Ubuntu) => null-and-void ** Information type changed from Public to Private ** Changed in: null-and-void Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036373] [NEW] package cups-bsd 2.3.1-9ubuntu1.5 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

2023-09-17 Thread William Ryan
Public bug reported: I am attempting to install Zoom onto my laptop. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: cups-bsd 2.3.1-9ubuntu1.5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-83.92~20.04.1-generic 5.15.116 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-8

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978079] Re: EFI pstore not cleared on boot

2023-07-26 Thread William Tu
** Also affects: linux-bluefield (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: linux-bluefield (Ubuntu Impish) ** No longer affects: linux-bluefield (Ubuntu Kinetic) ** Changed in: linux-bluefield (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => William Tu (wtu) ** Chan

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2009502] Re: Enable /dev/sgx_vepc access for the group 'sgx'

2023-03-24 Thread William Wilson
The verification passed for jammy: william@william-Latitude-E7470  ~  apt-cache policy udev udev: Installed: 249.11-0ubuntu3.7 Candidate: 249.11-0ubuntu3.9 Version table: 249.11-0ubuntu3.9 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1999104] Re: arm64: broken c++ exception handler support leads to std::terminate() being called and program abort

2023-03-22 Thread William Ashley
Thanks! I verified bionic and focal (via docker images) now successfully run the libunwind-using tests updated earlier. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libunwind in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19991

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2011722] [NEW] Move oem-config-setup steps into ubuntu-raspi-settings-desktop

2023-03-15 Thread William Wilson
Public bug reported: When building images with livecd-rootfs, there is a hook to set up oem- config for preinstalled raspi desktop images. As we move away from livecd-rootfs (and the use of hooks in general), this step should be moved into a package. ** Affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu) Impo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2009502] Re: Enable /dev/sgx_vepc access for the group 'sgx'

2023-03-14 Thread William Wilson
The verification passed for jammy: ``` william@william-Latitude-E7470  ~  apt-cache policy udev udev: Installed: 249.11-0ubuntu3.7 Candidate: 249.11-0ubuntu3.8 Version table: *** 249.11-0ubuntu3.8 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007913] Re: HDMI Output sound has disappeared after Ubuntu update

2023-03-07 Thread William
You select your kernel in the grub boot menu. There is an option for alternative boot configurations. I have a dual boot environment set up so grub comes up every time for me. I think you hit esc to bring it up if it normally boots straight into windows. If you have any trouble it should come up in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007913] Re: HDMI Output sound has disappeared after Ubuntu update

2023-03-07 Thread William
Booting with linux-image-5.19.0-35-generic appears to be the problem in 22.10. Booting with linux-image-5.19.0-21-generic lists the audio devices again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. ht

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007913] Re: HDMI Output sound has disappeared after Ubuntu update

2023-03-04 Thread William
This issue is also present in 22.10. After the update broke audio, I reinstalled 22.10 from a live usb which fixed the issue until I updated again and the issue reappeared. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1999104] Re: arm64: broken c++ exception handler support leads to std::terminate() being called and program abort

2023-02-17 Thread William Ashley
Thank you for that thorough explanation and helping get this fix released, Matthew. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libunwind in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999104 Title: arm64: broken c++ excep

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1999104] Re: arm64: broken c++ exception handler support leads to std::terminate() being called and program abort

2023-02-16 Thread William Ashley
How long will it take for these changes to be released to Focal and Bionic? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libunwind in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999104 Title: arm64: broken c++ exception han

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2004092] Re: casper fails to add any users because GID 999 is already taken

2023-02-09 Thread William Wilson
** Tags removed: rls-ll-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2002318] Re: Please merge lsb 11.5 from Debian unstable.

2023-01-13 Thread William Wilson
This bug was fixed in the package lsb - 11.5 Sponsored for Dave Jones (waveform) --- lsb (11.5) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. * Drop lsb-release, taken over by src:lsb-release-minimal. -- Adam Borowski Wed, 02 Nov 2022 01:41:43 +0100 lsb (11.4) unstable; urgency=med

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2002318] Re: Please merge lsb 11.5 from Debian unstable.

2023-01-13 Thread William Wilson
After some internal team discussion we've agreed to do a force-sync from Debian to only use the empty transitional package. till-kamppeter has confirmed that printer drivers have moved to snap based rather than needing lsb to install. ** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2002428] Re: Autopkgtest failure due to moved testcase

2023-01-11 Thread William Wilson
Thanks for the patch! One comment, when a patch is ready for sponsoring you can drop the "~ppa2" from the version number. I'll just go ahead and do that before uploading for this one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1999104] Re: libunwind causes crashes on arm64

2022-12-09 Thread William Ashley
The key difference that --enable-cxx-exceptions makes is that it results in libunwind having _Unwind_RaiseException (and likely other functions), which gets called during a C++ throw by __cxa_throw. Without libunwind, this symbol is provided by libgcc_s, whose implementation works correctly. For wh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1999104] Re: libunwind causes crashes on arm64

2022-12-09 Thread William Ashley
1.2.1-10 (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunwind/1.2.1-10) resolves this issue on 20. It includes a change to not use --enable-cxx- exceptions when building libunwind, and that is the key here. Even on Ubuntu 22, with its much newer upstream version of libunwind, adding that option triggers

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1999104] Re: libunwind causes crashes on arm64

2022-12-08 Thread William Ashley
I've slimmed down the reproducer to a single main function and removed any additional compiler arguments. ** Attachment added: "repro.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunwind/+bug/1999104/+attachment/5635160/+files/repro.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1994936] Re: initramfs need to mount efivarfs because kernel 6.0 deprecated 'efivars' sysfs interface

2022-10-28 Thread William Wilson
** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1994936 Title: initramfs need to mount efivarfs because kernel 6.0 deprecated 'efi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1994165] Re: CMS_final: do not ignore CMS_dataFinal result

2022-10-28 Thread William Wilson
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1994165 Title: CMS_final: do not ignore CMS_dataFinal result Status in openssl pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1980937] Re: [HP EliteBook 840 G8 Notebook PC, Realtek ALC245, Speaker, Internal] No sound except loud crackling (popping) noise

2022-10-21 Thread william mantly
Same issue with a HP envy 15-ew0 Alder Lake-P and Realtek ALC245. I have tried kernels 5.15, 5.19, 6 and 6.1 RC. I have tried Ubuntu 22.10, 22.04, Linux Mint 21, popOS and fedora 36. Speakers do not work on any of them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992364] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.140ubuntu13 failed to install/upgrade: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2022-10-11 Thread William Wilson
This appears to be an issue with a missing `/etc/kernel/cmdline` file. Did that file somehow get removed from your system? ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, whic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992369] Re: DejaVu Serif Italic capital letters and digits broken

2022-10-11 Thread William Wilson
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fonts-dejavu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992369 Title: DejaVu Serif Italic capital letters and digits broken Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991285] Re: systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.18 ADT test failure with linux/5.4.0-128.144

2022-10-11 Thread William Wilson
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991285 Title: systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.18 ADT test failure with linux/5.4.0-128.144

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978738] Re: systemd-oomd and zram-config services: "Swap is currently not detected; memory pressure usage will be degraded"

2022-10-11 Thread William Wilson
@Oibaf, this bug is fixed in the Ubuntu package in kinetic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978738 Title: systemd-oomd and zram-config services: "Swap is c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898207] Re: package logsave (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: no package named 'logsave' is installed, cannot configure

2022-10-11 Thread William Wilson
This "Operation not permitted" error looks suspicious. @rubiselprieto can you check the permissions on your /etc/cron.d directory? ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, wh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991553] Re: can't add a private PPA

2022-10-04 Thread William Wilson
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991553 Title: can't add a private PPA Status in software-properties

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991525] Re: vim.gtk3 won't run after 22.04 upgrade: “libpng12.so.0: cannot open shared object file”

2022-10-04 Thread William Wilson
I'm unable to recreate this issue on a jammy system that has been upgraded from focal. Can you make sure all of your packages are up to date? After poking through the vim source code there are no references to libpng12, so it may be some dependency of vim that is out of date trying to read it. **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990742] Re: screen not consistently locking when lid is closed

2022-10-04 Thread William Wilson
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990742 Title: screen not consistently locking when lid is closed Status in syste

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1896540] Re: Incorrectly specified Touchpad size for Lenovo T490

2022-10-04 Thread William Wilson
@arutyun-akopov, can you try the workaround detailed in comment #1? ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833863] Re: Incorrect logic for

2022-10-04 Thread William Wilson
Marking as Won't Fix for pyxdg as it appears this bug has been solved with fixes in other packages. ** Changed in: pyxdg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pyxdg in Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1704416] Re: CAP_AUDIT_READ is not supported on Xenial

2022-10-04 Thread William Wilson
Marking this as won't fix because xenial is no longer supported. All supported releases have libcap2 2.25 or newer, which fixes this bug. ** Changed in: libcap2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842439] Re: apport-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV in _gtk_settings_get_screen(settings=0x0)

2022-09-15 Thread William Wilson
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842439 Title: apport-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV in _gtk_settings_get_screen(sett

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1703377] Re: Gnome online account login prevents paste or autotype

2022-09-15 Thread William J. Vallance
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703377 Title: Gnome online account login prevents paste or autotype Status in gnome-online-accounts: New St

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1989381] Re: package linux-firmware 20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.5 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote linux-firmware, o script post-installation retor

2022-09-14 Thread William Wilson
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to update the kernel on your system due to a lack of free space in your boot partition. Please resolve this situation manually and try the update again.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1988870] Re: apport-autoreport.service fails: whoopsie.path is not enabled

2022-09-14 Thread William Wilson
Can you check in the control panel under "Privacy" -> "Diagnostics"? If "Send error reports to Canonical" is set to "Never" then the whoopsie.path service will be disabled. ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1988119] Re: Update to systemd 237-3ubuntu10.54 broke dns

2022-08-30 Thread William Bergmann Børresen
To temporary mitigate the ImagePullBackOff I scaled up a new functional node (DNS wise) and used this command to reconcile the AKS cluster: az resource update --resource-group --name --namespace Microsoft.ContainerService --resource-type ManagedClusters This recovered CoreDNS in the kube-syst

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1575912] Re: [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all after fresh xubuntu 16.04 installation

2022-07-21 Thread William Z Chadwick
Huh, interesting. When I hover my cursor over the sound widgit in my top panel bar, it says: Output: 100% 0.00 dB Built-in Audio Analog Stereo And it says this even when I have something playing that ought to be outputting sound. Doesn't 0.00 db mean silence? Reading this now to find out what I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1575912] Re: [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all after fresh xubuntu 16.04 installation

2022-07-21 Thread William Z Chadwick
Re:^^^ Oh, and I have the soundcard: Realtek ALC269VB Analog, also. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575912 Title: [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1575912] Re: [hostname, Realtek ALC269VB, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all after fresh xubuntu 16.04 installation

2022-07-21 Thread William Z Chadwick
Hi, This sounds similar to my bug. I am pretty sure my physical speakers work, and even that they worked when I first installed Ubuntu Mate 22.04, but very shortly afterwards they stopped working. The headphone jack also doesn't work. I installed a jack-detection repo and now sometimes (not cons

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1980991] Re: /usr/sbin/on_ac_power incorrectly reporting ac power status

2022-07-14 Thread William Wilson
** Changed in: powermgmt-base (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to powermgmt-base in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980991 Title: /usr/sbin/on_ac_power incorrec

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1976258] Re: icu ftbfs in the jammy release pocket

2022-06-10 Thread William Wilson
** Changed in: icu (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Tags added: block-proposed-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to icu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976258 Title: icu ftbfs in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1976258] Re: icu ftbfs in the jammy release pocket

2022-06-08 Thread William Wilson
** Description changed: - as seen in a test rebuild, this package fails to build in the jammy - release pocket (note the log behind the link might go away): + [Impact] + * icu is currently FTBFS in the jammy release pocket + + [Test Plan] + * Build the package from -proposed against the jammy -pr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1461530] Re: Translation make output hard to read

2022-03-06 Thread William Andrea
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1581433 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581433 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1581433 free output in german translation line up wrong colums -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packag

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1581433] Re: free output in german translation line up wrong colums

2022-03-06 Thread William Andrea
Affects the French translation too. ** Attachment added: "free French sample.output" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1581433/+attachment/5566379/+files/free%20French%20sample.output -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961805] Re: Please merge procps 2:3.3.17-6 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2022-02-22 Thread William Wilson
Excellent work. Just one comment, it's best practice to add the "please merge" bug number in the changelog. That way this bug will be automatically closed when the package is uploaded. I'll go ahead and add that in before I sponsor it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960460] Re: Fails to import ZFS rpool during boot

2022-02-16 Thread William Wilson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1960083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960083 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1960083 dirname applet missing from initramfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960458] [NEW] patch git_socket_dir.patch causing FTBFS in gspell

2022-02-09 Thread William Wilson
Public bug reported: With this patch applied gspell is FTBFS with the following errors: Bail out! dbind-FATAL-WARNING: Couldn't connect to accessibility bus: Failed to connect to socket debian/home/.cache/at-spi/bus: No such file or directory I removed the patch and rebuilt this package in a PPA

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1957126] [NEW] lscpu not showing number of sockets on arm64

2022-01-11 Thread William Wilson
Public bug reported: When running `lscpu` on arm64, the number of sockets is not populated. This is seen on both Raspberry Pi hardware and in the autopkgtest environment. Example output: Architecture:aarch64 CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order:Little Endia

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1650688] Re: timedatectl set-timezone fails on UC16

2021-11-19 Thread William Wilson
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650688 Title: timedatectl set-timezone fails on UC16 Status in Snappy: Triaged Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951161] Re: Please merge shadow 1:4.8.1-2 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-11-18 Thread William Wilson
** Patch added: "Diff from Debian" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1951161/+attachment/5541800/+files/debian_ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu. https://bu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951161] Re: Please merge shadow 1:4.8.1-2 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-11-18 Thread William Wilson
** Patch added: "Diff from 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu9" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1951161/+attachment/5541799/+files/ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951161] Re: Please merge shadow 1:4.8.1-2 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-11-18 Thread William Wilson
Thanks for catching that alexmurray. I'll upload new debdiffs in a moment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951161 Title: Please merge shadow 1:4.8.1-2 (main

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951161] Re: Please merge shadow 1:4.8.1-2 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-11-17 Thread William Wilson
** Patch added: "Diff from Debian" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1951161/+attachment/5541538/+files/debian_ubuntu.debdiff ** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu) Assignee: William Wilson (jawn-smith) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951161] Re: Please merge shadow 1:4.8.1-2 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-11-17 Thread William Wilson
** Patch added: "Diff from Debian" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1951161/+attachment/5541536/+files/debian_ubuntu.debdiff ** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith) ** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu) Stat

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951161] Re: Please merge shadow 1:4.8.1-2 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-11-17 Thread William Wilson
** Patch added: "Diff from 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu9" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1951161/+attachment/5541537/+files/ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951161] Re: Please merge shadow 1:4.8.1-2 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-11-17 Thread William Wilson
** Patch added: "Diff from 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu9" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1951161/+attachment/5541535/+files/ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951161] [NEW] Please merge shadow 1:4.8.1-2 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-11-16 Thread William Wilson
Public bug reported: This merge is necessary because there are changes present in Ubuntu that are not present in Debian. ** Affects: shadow (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, wh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1944621] Re: sshd in chroot has regression with glibc 2.34

2021-09-27 Thread William Wilson
This patch moves the configuration option to the appropriate section of d/rules and adds a reference to this bug report. ** Patch added: "lp1944621.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1944621/+attachment/5528491/+files/lp1944621.debdiff -- You received this bug no

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1944621] Re: sshd in chroot has regression with glibc 2.34

2021-09-23 Thread William Wilson
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Assignee: William Wilson (jawn-smith) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1944621] Re: sshd in chroot has regression with glibc 2.34

2021-09-22 Thread William Wilson
** Patch added: "Configure without closefrom" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1944621/+attachment/5527126/+files/lp1944621.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1944621] Re: sshd in chroot has regression with glibc 2.34

2021-09-22 Thread William Wilson
I created upstream bugs to track this: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3349 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28377 ** Bug watch added: OpenSSH Portable Bugzilla #3349 https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3349 ** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #283

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1944621] [NEW] sshd in chroot has regression with glibc 2.34

2021-09-22 Thread William Wilson
.34 implementation of fallback_closefrom fails if /proc/self/fd is not present, which is a valid sshd use case. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: William Wilson (jawn-smith) Status: New ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => W

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1941799] Re: Please merge openssh 1:8.4p1-6 from Debian unstable

2021-09-20 Thread William Wilson
Actually, a feature of openssh is being able to use a chroot that doesn't look like a root filesystem, so we'll have to consider how to move forward on this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1941799] Re: Please merge openssh 1:8.4p1-6 from Debian unstable

2021-09-20 Thread William Wilson
Mounting /proc in the chroot fixed the test. I'll prepare a patch and an upstream bug report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941799 Title: Please merge op

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1941799] Re: Please merge openssh 1:8.4p1-6 from Debian unstable

2021-09-20 Thread William Wilson
So this is fun, the upstream openssh actually has the same test failure when running `make tests`. So it doesn't appear to be something we introduced here, but it is definitely a problem that needs solving. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded pack

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1941799] Re: Please merge openssh 1:8.4p1-6 from Debian unstable

2021-09-20 Thread William Wilson
Bryceh: I've been looking into this a bit. Removing the --oknodo had no effect on the tests, and neither did removing the diff that we carry from Debian. I've also noticed that the issue only occurs on kernel <= 5.8. The tests all pass when run in a test environment with kernel 5.11 or 5.13, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939751] Re: openssh FTBFS with glibc >= 2.34

2021-08-27 Thread William Wilson
paelzer: I worked the merge under https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1941799 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939751 Title: openssh FTBF

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1941799] Re: Please merge openssh 1:8.4p1-6 from Debian unstable

2021-08-27 Thread William Wilson
** Patch added: "Diff from 1:8.4p1-5ubuntu2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1941799/+attachment/5521261/+files/lp1941799-ubuntu-ubuntu.debdiff ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Assignee: William Wilson (jawn-smith) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: op

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1941799] Re: Please merge openssh 1:8.4p1-6 from Debian unstable

2021-08-27 Thread William Wilson
This diff from Debian still includes the seccomp fixes pulled in for glibc 2.33, as they are still relevant with glibc 2.34. These are in upstream openssh version 8.5, so when Debian gets to 8.5 we can sync and drop the diff. ** Patch added: "Diff from Debian" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1941799] [NEW] Please merge openssh 1:8.4p1-6 from Debian unstable

2021-08-26 Thread William Wilson
Public bug reported: This merge is needed because there are changes in Ubuntu that are not present in Debian. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: William Wilson (jawn-smith) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Assignee

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939751] Re: openssh FTBFS with glibc >= 2.34

2021-08-25 Thread William Wilson
@paelzer I would be happy to work on the merge if you would like. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939751 Title: openssh FTBFS with glibc >= 2.34 Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939751] Re: openssh FTBFS with glibc >= 2.34

2021-08-12 Thread William Wilson
** Patch added: "lp1939751.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/openssh/+bug/1939751/+attachment/5517643/+files/lp1939751.debdiff ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Assignee: William Wilso

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939751] Re: openssh FTBFS with glibc >= 2.34

2021-08-12 Thread William Wilson
: New => In Progress ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939751

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939751] [NEW] openssh FTBFS with glibc >= 2.34

2021-08-12 Thread William Wilson
Public bug reported: Due to an incompatible function prototype in openbsd-compat tests, this package FTBFS with glibc >= 2.34. There is an upstream patch already in place to address this. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notif

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939728] Re: Please merge icu 67.1-7 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-08-12 Thread William Wilson
** Patch added: "Diff from 67.1-6ubuntu2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/+bug/1939728/+attachment/5517575/+files/lp1939728_ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff ** Changed in: icu (Ubuntu) Assignee: William Wilson (jawn-smith) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: icu (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939728] Re: Please merge icu 67.1-7 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-08-12 Thread William Wilson
** Patch added: "Diff from 67.1-6ubuntu2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/+bug/1939728/+attachment/5517573/+files/lp1939728_ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to icu in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939728] Re: Please merge icu 67.1-7 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-08-12 Thread William Wilson
** Patch added: "Diff from Debian" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/+bug/1939728/+attachment/5517574/+files/lp1939728_debian_ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to icu in Ubuntu. https:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939728] Re: Please merge icu 67.1-7 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-08-12 Thread William Wilson
** Changed in: icu (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: icu (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith) ** Patch added: "Diff from Debian" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/+bug/1939728/+attachmen

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939728] [NEW] Please merge icu 67.1-7 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-08-12 Thread William Wilson
Public bug reported: This requires a merge because there are changes in the Ubuntu version not present in the Debian version. ** Affects: icu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905627] Re: Bluetooth stops working on Raspberry Pi 4 with bluez 5.55-0ubuntu1.1

2021-07-28 Thread William Wilson
This was fixed previously in hirsute by an upstream merge that resulted in bluez 5.56-0ubuntu1 ** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-21 Thread William Wilson
The verification passed for focal. jawn-smith@focal-vm:~$ apt-cache policy passwd passwd: Installed: 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04 Candidate: 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04.1 Version table: 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04.1 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-proposed/main amd64 Packages

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-21 Thread William Wilson
The verification passed for hirsute. jawn-smith@lvm:~$ apt-cache policy passwd passwd: Installed: 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu8 Candidate: 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu8.1 Version table: 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu8.1 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hirsute-proposed/main amd64 Packages *** 1:4.8.1-1ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-14 Thread William Wilson
The attached patch fixes the issue in focal ** Patch added: "Focal SRU" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1927078/+attachment/5510997/+files/lp197078_focal.debdiff ** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: shadow (Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-14 Thread William Wilson
The attached patch fixes the issue for hirsute. ** Patch added: "Hirsute Patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1927078/+attachment/5510996/+files/lp1927078_hirsute.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, w

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-14 Thread William Wilson
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith) ** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith) ** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-14 Thread William Wilson
** Description changed: - [Description] + [Impact] + + * If a fully numeric username is created, it will cause +problems with systemd. One example is that the user with +this type of name can log in, but loginctl will not create +a session for them. + * This can also cause users to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-12 Thread William Wilson
Per our discussion I just removed floating point checks altogether. "0.123" is now considered valid because it is impossible to have a floating point uid or gid so there will be no confusion with floating point numbers. I have added those floating point numbers to the "validUsernames" test, and add

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-12 Thread William Wilson
This one adds in a check for octal representation and some test cases for octal representation. ** Patch added: "Octal included this time" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1927078/+attachment/5510554/+files/lp1927078_fully_numeric_and_hex_and_octal.debdiff -- You receive

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-09 Thread William Wilson
This change disallows floating point and hexadecimal representations of numbers as well as purely numeric, which should be a good compromise. For example, 0x0 is now invalid, as well as 0x123456789 and 0.0, while 0x0x0x0x is considered valid. It also adds these new restrictions to the man page. **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-07 Thread William Wilson
This patch only disallows usernames that are strictly numeric per vorlon's comment above. It also adds more test cases for invalid usernames such as "0123456789" and valid usernames such as "0root" and "0.o". This time I also remembered that '0' is a digit. ** Patch added: "Fully numeric and more

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-06-18 Thread William Wilson
I'd be happy to make that change and add the test cases, but I'm still not sure which patch we landed on. I'm rather indifferent so I will leave the discussion to others before adding those test cases to whichever method we decide. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-06-17 Thread William Wilson
Attached is a patch that disallows fully numeric usernames while still allowing usernames such as 91jawn-smith. ** Patch added: "Disallow Fully Numeric Patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1927078/+attachment/5505363/+files/lp1927078_fully_numeric.debdiff -- You recei

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-06-17 Thread William Wilson
@Seth that very incorrect comment is actually part of block of upstream code that is commented out. It doesn't apply to the more relaxed Debian username scheme. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-06-16 Thread William Wilson
This fix for impish uses sbeattie's suggestion of simply disallowing a numeric character at the beginning of the username. It also includes a test case. ** Patch added: "lp1927078.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/1927078/+attachment/5505076/+files/lp1927078.debdif

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-06-15 Thread William Wilson
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Impish) Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927078 Title: Don'

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903351] Re: ignore_eacces and ignore_erofs patches don't work properly

2021-06-01 Thread William Wilson
The attached patch cleans up the switch statement to not replicate the xwarn. ** Patch added: "lp1903351_cleanup.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1903351/+attachment/5501733/+files/lp1903351_cleanup.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928966] Re: Please merge procps 2:3.3.17-5 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-05-25 Thread William Wilson
This diff from the previous Ubuntu version of the package is very large. That is mostly due to the new language packs and autoconf files present in the new Debian version of the package. This diff also addresses bug 1903351 by correcting the patches we carry for ignore_erofs and ignore_eaccess **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928966] Re: Please merge procps 2:3.3.17-5 (main) from Debian unstable

2021-05-25 Thread William Wilson
This diff from the previous Ubuntu version of the package is very large. That is mostly due to the new language packs and autoconf files present in the new Debian version of the package. This diff also addresses bug 1903351 by correcting the patches we carry for ignore_erofs and ignore_eaccess **

  1   2   3   4   5   >