Public bug reported:
hello,
paraview render is incorrect in ubuntu noble / mesa 24.0.9
a fix is available:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/32043
could it be backported ?
** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this b
Focal may be affected after all then
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868720
Title:
backport time64 syscalls whitelist
Status in libseccomp package in U
turns ou we may also need this fix in docker:
https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/40739
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868720
Title:
backport time64 sysc
of course, you do:
cd /tmp && git clone https://github.com/xantares/test-seccomp-time64.git
&& docker build test-seccomp-time64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
https://bu
** Patch added: "backport time64 syscalls from 2.4.2 into 2.4.1"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1868720/+attachment/5340882/+files/libseccomp241-time64.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is sub
Public bug reported:
A number of new *time64 syscalls are introduced in newer kernel series
(>=5.1.x):
403: clock_gettime64
404: clock_settime64
405: clock_adjtime64
406: clock_getres_time64
407: clock_nanosleep_time64
408: timer_gettime64
409: timer_settime64
410: timerfd_gettime64
411: timerfd_
Has this been released ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755250
Title:
backport statx syscall whitelist fix
Status in docker.io package in Ubuntu:
In
Ok for me too, I just installed libseccomp2_2.3.1-2.1ubuntu4.1_amd64.deb
and it works:
Step 16/18 : RUN gcc test-statx.c -o test-statx
---> Running in 501935bb923d
Removing intermediate container 501935bb923d
---> a47f15cd6fc8
Step 17/18 : RUN touch test-file
---> Running in 1038f76ad915
Removi
hello,
how long does it take usually for ubuntu to review the changes ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755250
Title:
backport statx syscall whitelist
here is a patch against libseccomp 2.3.1 in bionic (on top of the debian risc
port patch)
I manually applied changes from libseccomp 2.3.3 that reference the
statx syscalls
for the risc part i used the diff from
https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/blob/2a70ad4f3e8ab80e88f0662a760f4ef1d9219205/
10 matches
Mail list logo
