Closing assumed fixed. The solution wouldn't have been in lightdm
anyway.

** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
       Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060886

Title:
  lightdm does not pass Xserver DPI setting to gnome-session

Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  While most desktop users start gnome-session through lightdm login,
  lightdm does not pass DISPLAY DPI setting in /etc/X11/xorg.conf to the
  started gnome-session. I can see relative keywords in
  /var/log/Xorg.0.log indicating DPI setting is adopted by Xserver,  and
  I see  big font size in the unity-greeter interface indicating larger
  DPI setting in xorg.conf take effects. However inside the desktop, DPI
  is reset to default (96,96) with no reason.  Further I use xrandr to
  set DPI to a larger value but see no effect. Using xpdyinfo shows DPI
  is still (96,96).

  So does gnome just abandoned the display dpi feature in the
  application level? or is it mandatory to set dpi always to (96,96) by
  gnome?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
  Package: lightdm 1.3.3-0ubuntu5
  Uname: Linux 3.6.0-030600-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CheckboxSubmission: dc89d7045010e30edab47e64ddffb63e
  CheckboxSystem: 2954e74ba17fb0e37fc942cd1d9fab4e
  Date: Wed Oct  3 17:31:57 2012
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 
(20120425)
  SourcePackage: lightdm
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-09-16 (16 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1060886/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to