This bug was fixed in the package apport - 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.16
---
apport (2.14.1-0ubuntu3.16) trusty-proposed; urgency=medium
* Add data/general-hooks/powerpc.py: Collect some PowerPC[64] information.
Thanks to Thierry FAUCK! (LP: #1336462)
-- Brian Murray Thu, 24 Sep 2015 1
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336462
Title:
Make apport collect some Power inf
Hello Thierry, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apport into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.14.1-0ubuntu3.16 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
I confirm that with apport version 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.16 the powerpc.py
hook is installed in /usr/share/apport/general-hooks/.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which
The patch attached to comment#25:
Enhances PowerPC hook to capture more information if the underlying platform is
PowerNV. This patch adds support to collect following information:
- List all dump generated (ls -l)
- OPAL console log, if available.
- All of the OPAL-elog dump (if kernel specified
** Patch added: "[RFC PATCH] data/general-hooks/powerpc: Add support to collect
more data on PowerNV"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1336462/+attachment/4464703/+files/powernv-enchantments.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
T
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)
--
You received this bug notification because
I briefly looked at the patch in comment #25 and it seems fine, however
this would first need to be added to apport in wily. Please open a new
bug for the patch in comment #25. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
I've backported the powerpc hook from wily to trusty and uploaded a new
version of apport to trusty-proposed for the SRU team to review.
** Description changed:
+ TEST CASE
+ -
+ Verify that /usr/share/apport/general-hooks/powerpc.py exists after
installing the version of the package fro
Hello Thierry, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apport into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.14.1-0ubuntu3.14 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
The Trusty fix for the this bug was shadowed by a security update and
needs reuploading.
apport (2.14.1-0ubuntu3.15) trusty-security; urgency=medium
[ Marc Deslauriers ]
* This package does _not_ contain the changes from 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.14 in
trusty-proposed.
** Changed in: apport
** Attachment added: "output of apport-debug coreutils"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1336462/+attachment/4161940/+files/test.apport
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
Need to remove the debug staement and fix the tar directory
** Attachment added: "python script"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1336462/+attachment/4161941/+files/powerpc.py
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
Hi Martin
Thanks for your comment
Off course the print statement will disappear.
I will attach the /tmp/test.apport
As for the 2 questions I raised and the wondering you have here is what the
developer of the initial query tool (in sosreport) answered:
> Mostly for /proc/device-tree/ as a t
Thanks Thierry; the coreutils output actually looks quite reasonable,
just the cpu_smt error message is a bit ugly. It might inflate a bit
when the device tree tar gets added, but I propose to only do that for
if report['ProblemType'].startswith('Kernel') or 'linux' in
report.get('Package')
How
Hello Martin,
That sounds good to me.
I would also think - according to previous comment on /dev/nvram, it would be
good to add the only for the kernel type of report.
Great thanks for your help with that issue (and programming advise) .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
As per last comment Canonical to handle it now.
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
ht
I'm struggling with /proc/ppc64; "tar cv /proc/ppc64/ | tar t" only
archives the dir, and never anything inside it, so it seems tar has some
trouble with the "magic" dirs in /proc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
Ah, nevermind, it's a symlink.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336462
Title:
Make apport collect some Power information
Status in “apport” package in Ubunt
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/utopic/apport/ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336462
Title:
Make apport collect some Power information
OK, cleaned this up and tested in a ppc64 VM:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-
dev/ubuntu/utopic/apport/ubuntu/revision/2340
Please let me know if anything is still missing, we can always reiterate
on that. Thanks!
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committe
This bug was fixed in the package apport - 2.14.5-0ubuntu4
---
apport (2.14.5-0ubuntu4) utopic; urgency=medium
[ Steve Langasek ]
* Fix invalid shebang lines for apport-noui maintainer scripts which I
somehow overlooked.
[ Martin Pitt ]
* Add data/general-hooks/powerpc.py
Hello Thierry,
so you found the .txt.gz issue already (text files get automatically
compressed by dpkg when they exceed 1 kB or so, thus the reference is
wrong, sorry). Going through your replies one by one, starting with the
first questions:
> Do I understand correctly I would need so create a f
sosreport.py from comment 3:
except:
FYI, it's better to do "except IOError:" here. Otherwise this will catch
absolutely all exceptions, including e. g. SyntaxError or ValueError if
you have a typo. That way you'll still get unexpected exceptions on
stderr.
self.add_cmd_ou
FTR, I'm subscribed to this bug now, so I'll read/reply to your
responses timely.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336462
Title:
Make apport collect some Pow
Comment 4, proposed hook:
> if arch in [ "ppc64", "ppc64le"]:
> print "Processing power %s" %arch
Please use print(...) to be compatible with Python 3. Ubuntu has used
Apport with Python3 for several releases already. Also, please use 4
spaces for indentation, but I can fix such small issues mys
The servicelog package is as follow:
NAME
servicelog - query the contents of the servicelog
SYNOPSIS
/usr/bin/servicelog [options]
DESCRIPTION
The servicelog command queries and displays the contents of the system
servicelog. You can use the --query option to select
To answer the security question, as far as I understand it it can report about
system or drivers as it reports about system events
Man page precise the following:
The following column names can used to select OS-type events: os.ver-
sion, subsystem, driver, and device (all text).
Sorry, 2 caveats
- the add_copy_spec() function is not yet properly done as it covers tree of
files and it sounds not clear yet if all files are needed and if a tar file is
better than a set of single small files.
- the case of /dev/nvram is not solved either as it potentially reports info on
c
Here is a new version of the python file: (It runs now).
import os, re, os.path, sys, platform
import apport.packaging
import apport.hookutils
from glob import glob
from apport.hookutils import command_output, attach_root_command_outputs,
attach_file, attach_file_if_exists, command_available
Hello Thierry,
sorry for the late response (buried in stuff/extra day off). I suppose
all those debug statements like print("try") will go away?
As I don't have access to such a machine, could you perhaps run
apport-bug --save /tmp/test.apport coreutils
with that hook installed, and attach /
As for /dev/nvram: This seems to be the kind of information which we
should only attach to kernel reports, or which bug triagers should
request explicity.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https
33 matches
Mail list logo
