Even if "there are lots of users who do not want networks connecting
automatically" was true, that wouldn't matter, as long as they were
still a small minority compared with the case I described of people
wanting to connect to a wi-fi network at a cafe, airport, university, or
other venue that they
This is most certainly not a bug, it is a feature request.
Splitting up the dropdown into something like "Visited/Remembered
Networks" and "Other/Unknown Networks", which default to a collapsed
list would make sense and could possible be a useful feature. Either
way, that would need to be handled
@ James Anslow, no because it's not signal strength that defines the
significance of the network to the user. The user is making connection
decisions based on the identity of the network. Even in a context where
a user is trying to select between several free networks, signal
strength may or may no
Wouldn't it make more sense to simply organise network names by the
access points' signal strength, descending?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-network in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14259
** Description changed:
When a user clicks the network manager indicator, a dropdown appears and
lists wifi networks. This menu should NOT display networks that the user
has never connected to. Networks the user has never connected to should
- only display in the "More networks" folder. At a
** Summary changed:
- Networks I have never connected to should be confined to the "More Networks"
folder
+ Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an "Unknown
Networks" folder
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whic
6 matches
Mail list logo
