*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1003842 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842
I reformatted over 14.04 and installed 16.04 as a fresh start. I use a
slightly customized server install ISO image that includes my own
preseed file for automation. My approach is to start with a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1003842 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842
What remains unexplained is why the dnsmasq package was installed on
your machine at all. Is it the case that dnsmasq was not installed
before the upgrade and it was installed after the upgrade? In that
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1003842 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1003842
dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with
non-equivalent nameservers
** Package changed: resolvconf (Ubuntu) => dnsmasq
I'll give it a go and see if any problems occur. Thanks for your help!
Michael
On 04/27/2016 03:21 PM, Thomas Hood wrote:
> That name service does not work properly when dnsmasq is installed is
> most probably due to bug #1003842. If that is the case then if you
> remove 8.8.8.8 from the list
That name service does not work properly when dnsmasq is installed is
most probably due to bug #1003842. If that is the case then if you
remove 8.8.8.8 from the list of nameserver addresses then name service
will work reliably.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
No, it does not work when dnsmasq is installed. At least, not
reliably. I discovered this when apache2 started ignoring the
configuration for my virtual hosts because it couldn't resolve the
virtual host names. I could reach some hosts, like archive.ubuntu.com
for instance whenever I did an
Ah, I understand now. Sorry.
Michael
On 04/27/2016 12:42 PM, Thomas Hood wrote:
> The answer to the question "shouldn't those DNS servers should be
> included in /etc/resolv.conf regardless of the presence of dnsmasq?" is
> "no". Resolvconf doesn't list any nameserver addresses after any
>
Everything looks correct. Does name service work both when dnsmasq is
installed and when it is not installed? If so then there is no problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to resolvconf in Ubuntu.
Maybe I'm just confused about how resolvconf and dnsmasq should work,
but here's how it's working on my new 16.04 system:
root@ecoli:~# dpkg -l | grep dnsmasq
ii dnsmasq 2.75-1 all
Small caching DNS proxy and DHCP/TFTP server
ii dnsmasq-base 2.75-1
If you install the dnsmasq package then that package starts a standalone
instance of the dnsmasq program and resolv.conf will contain a line
`nameserver 127.0.0.1` which tells the resolver to consult that instance
of the dnsmasq program, which will by default forward DNS queries to the
nameservers
They are specified in /etc/network/interfaces just as you instructed,
and the dnsmasq-base package is installed. But when dnsmasq is
installed then resolvconf generates an incorrect /etc/resolv.conf. If I
remove the dnsmasq package then resolvconf works properly and generates
the expected
Not dnsmasq but dnsmasq-base is pulled in by ubuntu-desktop.
If you define your interfaces statically using /etc/network/interfaces
then you have to add the nameserver information to
/etc/network/interfaces on lines like "dns-nameserver 1.2.3.4". See
resolvconf(8) for more info.
** Changed in:
12 matches
Mail list logo
