** Changed in: base-files (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1598212
Title:
/etc/os-release: Please specify
This bug was fixed in the package base-files - 9.4ubuntu4.3
---
base-files (9.4ubuntu4.3) xenial; urgency=medium
* /etc/os-release: Add VERSION_CODENAME per upstream spec (LP:
#1598212)
-- Adam Conrad Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:48:58 -0600
** Changed in:
I verified the xenial SRU: source and binary package diffs and resulting
/etc/os-release is as expected:
VERSION_CODENAME=xenial
UBUNTU_CODENAME=xenial
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This bug was fixed in the package base-files - 9.6ubuntu3
---
base-files (9.6ubuntu3) yakkety; urgency=medium
* /etc/os-release: Add VERSION_CODENAME per upstream spec (LP:
#1598212)
-- Adam Conrad Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:45:34 -0600
** Changed in: base-files
We removed looking for UBUNTU_CODENAME in
d57b958d2c7a8deedd04223509f495f3978ca5f9. There is one leftover instance
in our tests that uses it. I pushed a branch to snapd to kill that last
usage as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
Hello Benjamin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted base-files into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-
files/9.4ubuntu4.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1598212
Title:
/etc/os-release: Please specify
Likely need to keep both UBUNTU_CODENAME and VERSION_CODENAME in xenial
forever, to avoid having to add a (very) icky "Breaks: snapd (<< fixed-
version)" to base-files when we remove it.
Though, in the interest of correctness, I suppose that Breaks would also
be necessary in yakkety, but maybe we
** Also affects: base-files (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1598212
Title:
/etc/os-release:
** Changed in: base-files (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1598212
Title:
/etc/os-release: Please specify
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #829245
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829245
** Also affects: base-files (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829245
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
should be an addition of VERSION_CODENAME in yakkety rather than a
straight replace. snapd, for instance, consumes UBUNTU_CODENAME, since
it's the only field in /etc/os-release with this information
currently
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
This warrants an archive grep for UBUNTU_CODENAME first; I think Michael
Vogt added that the other day, so presumably it's being used in snappy?
So for the time being it'd be better to have both until users of
UBUNTU_CODENAME get updated.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
14 matches
Mail list logo