[Touch-packages] [Bug 1655181] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2017-01-29 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From amo...@au1.ibm.com 2017-01-29 22:25 EDT--- I think both e4aa8a9 ("PowerPC64 ELFv1 undefined weak functions") and 7f27ccfc ("PR 20472, PowerPC64 ifunc confusion") should be left off 2.26 based binutils. While the undefined weak fix is desirable, it broke ifunc and the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1655181] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2017-01-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2017-01-23 14:49 EDT--- (In reply to comment #14) > Steve, could you please take a look at this request? Steve and I do not understand what you are asking here. Can you be specific about what you want from us? I thought this bug was fairly clear about