I changed the resample-method to soxr-hq, and I'll be testing it for
some time. According to the manpage of pulse-daemon.conf "the Soxr
resamplers generally offer better quality at less CPU compared to other
resamplers, such as speex". So far I think it gives better sound
quality than
unsure, you are the one who reported an issue/request for change, do you
think you request has been addressed or do you still think changing
would be better?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in
I had already changed the resample-method to soxr-mq, and am satisfied
with the result. I don't know how to judge which is better, auto or
soxr-mq?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
Well, how are you supposed to know, which resample method is actually
used?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741045
Title:
Change the default
Upstream bug comment
'Now there is resample-method setting "auto" which seems to be the
default.'
Is the problem still existing on recent Ubuntu versions with the auto
value?
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: pulseaudio
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
** Changed in: pulseaudio
Importance: Wishlist => Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
Launchpad has imported 2 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104486.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
7 matches
Mail list logo
