The rename is done upstream, it's now suspend-then-hibernate. I'm
uploading systemd with these patches.
As for G-S-D, I've adjusted it for the rename too but it's still waiting
to be merged.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Summary changed:
- FFe: Support
Gsd is pushing for the name change in systemd, so I'm going to get that
upstreamed before bringing this into Ubuntu. (Suspend to hibernate to
suspend then hibernate).
In terms of UI where would it Land? I figure it should be a policy setting
on systems that ship with it, but you're probably right
The systemd part is OK since it's cherry-picks - +1 for uploading that.
For g-s-d I would prefer to wait for it to be more firm upstream,
especially with regard to the naming. So I vote for waiting until it's
committed there. It might be helpful/useful/necessary for that to hang
out on #control-ce
This is an important improvement, so I have no objections from a docs
and/or translators POV.
One plea, though: To the extent this introduces new or changed
translatable strings, please notify the translators on the ubuntu-
translators list once those strings have been made available for
translati
upstream g-s-d asked for a name change but otherwise it seems fine in
principle
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756006
Title:
FFe: Support suspend-to-hiber
(rls-bb-notfixing from a desktop perspective, it doesn't need to be
milestoned but we want to review/comment on the change anyway)
** Tags removed: rls-bb-incoming
** Tags added: rls-bb-notfixing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whic
I am generally fine with this feature, especially after Dimitri's input.
So formally I approve of this FFe. But since this will also be changing
user-visible strings in systemd, I *think* you will also need to have an
UIFe, e.g. you will have to inform the doc and translation teams [1].
I'm not sur
Actually, I guess an UIFe will anyway be required as for the gnome-
settings-manager? I can't reach the Gnome gitlab today so I don't know
for sure. If it does affect some user visible strings, please proceed as
per my earlier comment and if the respective teams go +1 on it, we'll
formally switch t
>From systemd point of view, the patches are relatively straight forward,
and simply add "one more way to sleep/suspend/hybernate/etc" without
affecting any other code paths or any other functionality. Thus i see
little risk for landing the systemd patches.
If this turns out to be bad, only the po
** Tags added: bionic rls-bb-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756006
Title:
FFe: Support suspend-to-hibernate
Status in gnome-settings-daemon pack
No, not on modern system. We haven't used that technology for a while.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756006
Title:
FFe: Support suspend-to-hibernate
St
Out of curiosity - do we have firmware-based hibernate [1] enabled out
of the box?
[1] https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/26022.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
12 matches
Mail list logo