[Touch-packages] [Bug 1760979] Re: apt-get dist-upgrade failed

2018-08-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Fixed in cosmic. Need to get a clean list of bugs to SRU the changes, might be opening one per package and/or reusing existing ones. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: packagekit (U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1760979] Re: apt-get dist-upgrade failed

2018-04-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Note that dpkg and apt need to go first, then we can add support to other tools. The solution is not entirely optimal (at least theoretically): Crashing the frontend releases the frontend lock, so other frontends could start doing stuff (though probably fail at dpkg lock). It would have been nice t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1760979] Re: apt-get dist-upgrade failed

2018-04-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I think with basically trivial patches in just dpkg, apt, python-apt, and packagekit we should have solved most of that. At least the apt tools, and any tool using python-apt or packagekit will be safe from being interfered with. ** Also affects: python-apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1760979] Re: apt-get dist-upgrade failed

2018-04-03 Thread Seth Arnold
I'm glad it's not a catastrophe due to a regression in this specific update, but it's unfortunate that it looks like it will take a lot of work to reliably resolve. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1760979] Re: apt-get dist-upgrade failed

2018-04-03 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Well, yes, that happens sometimes. There is a race, because apt needs to release the dpkg lock before starting dpkg. Guess I should poke guillem about https://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2017/01/msg00044.html again. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: ap