This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.32.90.20190929-0ubuntu2
---
binutils (2.32.90.20190929-0ubuntu2) eoan; urgency=medium
* Snapshot, taken from the 2.33 branch (20190929).
- Fix PR25031, nm reports wrong address on 32bit. LP: #1845190.
- Fix PR25018, readelf
Impressively quick fix indeed, thanks!
I haven't seen any test added though. While such ELF files shouldn't be common,
it's a fairly basic feature and doesn't seem like requiring any complex test
fixture, does it?
Relying on diffoscope's test suite doesn't feel right.
--
You received this bug
** Tags removed: rls-ee-incoming
** Tags added: rls-ee-notfixing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190
Title:
binutils nm wrong output format breaks
I think this should land in Ubuntu as part of a regular snapshot upload
of binutils. I.e. without any special cherrypicking.
This may or might not be fixed in Eoan or f-cycle.
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: High => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are
thanks a ton for the quick fixes!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190
Title:
binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work
Status in binutils:
** Changed in: binutils
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190
Title:
binutils nm wrong output format breaks
Fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190
Title:
binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work
Status in binutils:
Fix Released
Status in
** Changed in: binutils
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190
Title:
binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm
The binutils-2_33-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-
gdb.git;h=895b6d98785ba89819820aa5f4abed17fbb28c37
commit 895b6d98785ba89819820aa5f4abed17fbb28c37
Author: Alan Modra
Date: Tue Sep 24 22:47:13 2019 +0930
PR25031, nm
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-
gdb.git;h=352f6bc3e5b23e76d8e6f56fb7db4e57d8f5d5bd
commit 352f6bc3e5b23e76d8e6f56fb7db4e57d8f5d5bd
Author: Alan Modra
Date: Tue Sep 24 22:47:13 2019 +0930
PR25031, nm reports wrong
> on amd64 it works correctly:
>
> nm elfmix1.not_a
> return42_or_3_long_name.o:
> T return42_or_3
> return42_or_3_long_name.obj:
> T return42_or_3
No, on amd64 the bug is the same as on i386. The correct output on both
i386 and amd64 must be:
** Tags added: rls-ee-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190
Title:
binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work
Status in binutils:
Launchpad has imported 2 comments from the remote bug at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25031.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
Public bug reported:
discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69
** Affects: binutils
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Affects: binutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
14 matches
Mail list logo
