It looks like the glib2.0/i386 regressions are actually real. I tried
locally and reproduced them. I then tried 2.62.4 and the tests pass
there. So I think I'll rev this SRU.
** Description changed:
[ Description ]
I'm creating this bug report to have a place to describe the proposed
- bac
Hello Iain, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glib2.0 into eoan-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.62.3-2~ubuntu19.10.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https
glib2.0/i386 was pretty consistently failing for me. It looks like the
new version in unstable is better
(https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac
/autopkgtest-eoan-laney-
ppa/eoan/i386/g/glib2.0/20191216_173854_41ef9@/log.gz), so I'm uploading
that
** Summary changed:
- [SRU] Backport 2.62.2-2
+ [SRU] Backport 2.62.3-2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850932
Title:
[SRU] Backport 2.62.3-2
Status in g
4 matches
Mail list logo
