[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2022-05-27 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: openssh Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938144 Title: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2022-01-27 Thread Paride Legovini
That PR is still pending review, no movements there unfortunately. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938144 Title: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2022-01-26 Thread Brian Murray
The Hirsute Hippo has reached End of Life, so this bug will not be fixed for that release. ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-09-20 Thread Athos Ribeiro
Thanks, Niklas! Utkarsh, Paride: Since this seems to be a low priority issue, I am waiting to see if we get a couple more eyes into https://github.com/openssh-gsskex/openssh-gsskex/pull/21 before adding this one in our delta (this could even go into Debian first and then we can start preparing

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-09-17 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Wt, thanks for confirming Niklas. Athos, would you mind prepping an MP for this, et al? TIA, good sir! \o/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938144

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-09-16 Thread Paride Legovini
** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-09-15 Thread Niklas Rother
Thanks for building the packages for focal. I can confirm that this fixes the problem for me! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938144 Title: monitor_read:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-09-14 Thread Athos Ribeiro
Hi Niklas, I just pushed the focal patched package to that same PPA. Note that they are only available for x86_64 and i386. Let me know if you need it for any other platforms. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-09-14 Thread Niklas Rother
Thanks for the PPA! I currently don't have an impish system at hand, would it be possible to build it for focal as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-09-13 Thread Athos Ribeiro
Dmitry Belyavskiy proposed a patch for this issue at https://github.com/openssh-gsskex/openssh-gsskex/pull/21. I created a PPA with the proposed fix at https://launchpad.net/~athos- ribeiro/+archive/ubuntu/openssh-gssapi-fix/+packages and I can confirm it does fix the reproducer proposed in this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-08-06 Thread Athos Ribeiro
** Also affects: openssh via https://github.com/openssh-gsskex/openssh-gsskex/issues/20 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-08-06 Thread Athos Ribeiro
The issue is reproducible in the latest published versions of openssh carrying the patches in https://github.com/openssh-gsskex/openssh-gsskex for Ubuntu (impish), Debian (unstable), and Fedora (rawhide). I filed a bug report in https://github.com/openssh-gsskex/openssh- gsskex/issues/20 to make

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-08-05 Thread Athos Ribeiro
Hi Niklas, Thanks for putting in the effort into finding a reproducer for the reported issue. I could indeed reproduce the issue you have been experiencing. I am attaching a couple scripts to aid others to reproduce the bug (this includes a README file with further instructions). Interestingly,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-08-02 Thread Niklas Rother
Ok, I managed to reproduces this in a clean "ubuntu:latest" docker container. Steps to reproduce are below. During testing, I noticed that I aliased "ssh" to "ssh -K -X", and that "-K" (or equivalently "-o GSSAPIAuthentication=yes") is crucial. This changes the problematic SSH client command to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-08-02 Thread Niklas Rother
Thanks Sergio for trying to reproduce this! I'm a bit puzzled, why the bug did not trigger in your case. I'll try to reproduce this in a clean VM as well now. One important thing might be that I tried to login as "root", for which I did not have a Kerberos-Ticket, so a "permission denied" would be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-07-30 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
So, I give this a try and attempted to reproduce the issue. I set up a VM acting as the KDC, and configured sshd in it with the following options: GSSAPIAuthentication yes GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes GSSAPIKeyExchange yes I then configured an LXD container to act as the krb5 client. I created

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-07-30 Thread Miriam EspaƱa Acebal
Hello Niklas! You're welcome again. Thanks for adding more information... Good to know we can put Ansible apart from this. Anyway, we would need more information about the Kerberos configuration you mentioned before as you noticed it is involved because we don't have the complete picture to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-07-29 Thread Niklas Rother
Hello Athos, thanks for looking into this! This is reproducible without Ansible, that was just use-case that brought up the issue. I've further narrowed it down to the following setup: Server: /usr/sbin/sshd -d -p -f /dev/null -o GSSAPIKeyExchange=yes -o GSSAPIAuthentication=yes Client:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2021-07-28 Thread Athos Ribeiro
Hello Niklas, Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report. While the symptoms experienced here seem similar to the ones reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162620, the patch that fixed the latter is present in the version of the package for which you reported the