This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 248.3-1ubuntu7
---
systemd (248.3-1ubuntu7) impish; urgency=medium
* d/tests/tests-in-lxd: suppress the cgroups v2 warning on stderr from
lxd/lxc even more comprehensively until the snapd change required to
do it nicely gets into a
** Tags removed: rls-ii-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635
Title:
systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on
armhf
S
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635
Title:
systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635
Title:
systemd-networkd failing to acqui
** Tags added: rls-ii-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635
Title:
systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on
armhf
Sta
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635
Title:
systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHC
I filed a bug in systemd (although I'm not really sure it's systemd's
bug) https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/20564 and uploaded a
simple workaround (in systemd) that passed systemd armhf autopkgtests in
my PPA. Fingers crossed!
We should come back and review this fix after glibc has migrat
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635
Title:
systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on
armhf
Status in gli
So what is going on is this:
In icmp6_receive systemd passes a buffer for control messages to recvmsg
that is only big enough for the messages it expects to receive. glibc
now attempts to append an extra control message to the buffer
(translating SO_TIMESTAMP / COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD to SO_TIMEST
We must be hitting this line, right?
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/convert_scm_timestamps.c;h=00c934c4135f0d4256068adcf23a3de024fadd43;hb=HEAD#l87
IOW, ddstreet was right in comment #10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Beginner error on my part : there are debug logs in networkd, I didn't
even check them. As often, it turns out part of the answer lies in
there.
Here are the logs from 2.33:
autopkgtest systemd-networkd[942]: test_eth42: Gained IPv6LL
autopkgtest systemd-networkd[942]: test_eth42: link_check_read
** Attachment added: "networkd-glib-2.34-3.trace"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1940635/+attachment/5521156/+files/networkd-glib-2.34-3.trace
** Attachment removed: "networkd-glib-2.34.trace"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1940635/+attachment/55
** Attachment added: "networkd-glib-2.33-3.trace"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1940635/+attachment/5521155/+files/networkd-glib-2.33-3.trace
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd i
Attached are new strace logs, I'll remove the previous files as there
was something wrong with my test setup, so the captured trace isn't
necessarily during the DHCPv6 tests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sys
We must build armhf glibc which is y2038 safe, like our v5.1+ kernels
are (bionic-hwe and up). Thus yes, glibc should assume TIME64 SYSCALLS,
on armhf.
Also, maybe our farm can move to focal and focal kernel; or like at
least to bionic-hwe kernel.
--
You received this bug notification because yo
A quick guess would be the problem is glibc upstream commit
13c51549e2077f2f3bf84e8fd0b46d8b0c615912, combined with upstream commit
a26918cfda4bc4b9dad8aae1496e3ef7cbb63d96 setting
__ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS based on the *build* time kernel (not runtime
kernel), and since our build farm runs a kernel
** Attachment added: "networkd-glib-2.34.trace"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1940635/+attachment/5520981/+files/networkd-glib-2.34.trace
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ub
I can now confirm that the bug has been introduced strictly by the glibc
2.34, and not another package in the -proposed pocket.
My reproduction steps were as following:
Boot an Ubuntu Impish qemu VM (fully up-to-date (funnily enough, far
from being a trivial thing to do, see at the bottom for poi
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635
Title:
systemd-networkd fai
Allright.
I was going to post in-depth investigation results to sum up what
stepping through the code taught me (pretty much nothing, it all goes
well until I lose the stepping thread due to callback/async stuff), but
right before sending the text I let GDB finish the program execution,
and lo and
Can somebody confirm my assumptions on the architecture of the test ?
First, it sets up a veth with router_eth42 at one end and test_eth42 at
the other (the itf names might be different ?). dnsmasq is bound against
router_eth42 which is configured manually via iproute with both IPv4 and
IPv6 addre
Is this only seen with glibc 2.34?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635
Title:
systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on
armhf
** Summary changed:
- systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DCHP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf
+ systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd i
25 matches
Mail list logo
