The versioning is confusing because this package is not self-contiained.
It gets most of its source code from another package, recorded via
`Built-Using: binutils` in its debian/control file. The actual buggy
code is in binutils-source 2.38-3ubuntu1; binutils-source 2.38-4ubuntu2
contains the fix.
Sorry if I'm missing something obvious but I've done a full apt upgrade
and tried to build wine again and the problem still persists so I don't
think the fix has released and the status is incorrect.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Title:
dlltool uses non-unique
binutils fix publised to jammy-updates on 2022-10-24, binutils-mingw-w64
would just need a recompile against binutils-source 2.38-4ubuntu2 to fix
this issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: binutils-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Title:
dlltool uses non-unique
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Title:
dlltool uses non-unique temp filenames
Status in binutils:
Fix
> Changed in binutils-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu):
> status: Triaged → Fix Released
not fixed in Kinetic yet either; it would be if rebuilt with the
binutils-source there now, but
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils-mingw-w64/9build1 built on
2022-04-26 is before Mattias brought in PR2885
** Changed in: binutils-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: binutils-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: binutils-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Title:
dlltool uses non-unique temp filenames
Status in binutils:
Fix
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Title:
dlltool uses non-unique temp filenames
Status in binutils:
Fix Released
Looks like https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.38-4ubuntu2
is now in the ubuntu-proposed pocket (thanks Matthias!). So binutils-
mingw-w64 would just need a recompile based on that resulting new
binutils-source_2.38-4ubuntu2_all.deb.
I don't think there should be any changes needed to
*** Bug 53675 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Title:
dlltool uses non-unique temp filenames
It's fixed upstream on the 2.38 branch too, and kinetic has that update
in binutils-source_2.38-4ubuntu1. So binutils-mingw-w64 just needs to be
recompiled against that latest binutils-source package (no other changes
needed, it already pulls the latest). And ideally an SRU back to jammy
LTS, just
This is fixed upstream in 2.39... can we have updated packages for
ubuntu? Some other distros have it already.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: binutils-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
I've also ran into the same issue, I can't compile wine using multi-
threading.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Title:
dlltool uses non-unique
*** Bug 53077 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971901
Title:
dlltool uses non-unique temp filenames
Launchpad has imported 16 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52770.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
Launchpad has imported 11 comments from the remote bug at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28885.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
** Also affects: wine via
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52770
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
Linking binutils package and subscribing Mattias Klose since
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.38-4ubuntu1 mentions
"Update from the binutils 2.38 branch: Fix PR 28885" and so a rebuild
based on binutils-source_2.38-4ubuntu1 would fix this issue.
--
You received this bug
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #28885
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28885
** Also affects: binutils via
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28885
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Also affects: binutils (Ubuntu)
Importance:
23 matches
Mail list logo
