[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991661] Re: systemd mounts /run without noexec

2022-10-04 Thread Steve Langasek
The initramfs-tools behavior is longstanding and deliberate; the systemd behavior is the buggy deviation. ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided =

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991661] Re: systemd mounts /run without noexec

2022-10-04 Thread Nick Rosbrook
I think one problem with changing this in systemd is that generators are allowed to be placed in /run [1]. While mounting /run noexec would not affect interpreted generators like bash scripts, it would prevent binary executable generators from being placed in /run. If we find it necessary, we coul

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991661] Re: systemd mounts /run without noexec

2022-10-05 Thread Craig Francis
Hi, I asked the original question, and tbh, I'm only just following along (I haven't really spent much time looking at initramfs/systemd). I'm just wondering, is this something that's likely to be changed for the AWS servers? Or should I use the suggestions from Andrew Lowther[1] on how I could m

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991661] Re: systemd mounts /run without noexec

2023-06-09 Thread Nick Rosbrook
** Tags removed: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991661 Title: systemd mounts /run without noexec Status in initramfs-tools packa