[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003903] Re: [BPO] openssl/3.0.5-2ubuntu2 from kinetic

2023-01-25 Thread Thomas Ward
OpenSSL is one of those tricky things out there I would like to get a Security insight for before we do any kind of backporting of it. There's other things this could impact, backports or not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003903] Re: [BPO] openssl/3.0.5-2ubuntu2 from kinetic

2023-01-25 Thread Thomas Ward
Mark, are you asking this to be backported in -backports or in -updates and -security? This is one of the packages that if we do this in -backports any security patches applied by the Security team for OpenSSL in -security and -updates would be ignored with the higher version of this in -backports

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003903] Re: [BPO] openssl/3.0.5-2ubuntu2 from kinetic

2023-01-25 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Minor OpenSSL releases have historically introduced a whole lot of behaviour and API changes that required fixing dozens of other packages in the archive. I don't recommend putting 3.0.5 in backports. What I suggest is to actually SRU the 3-4 commits that fix SSL_OP_LEGACY_SERVER_CONNECT to the ve

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003903] Re: [BPO] openssl/3.0.5-2ubuntu2 from kinetic

2023-01-25 Thread Thomas Ward
I've discussed this with mapreri who is another person on the backporters team. Given the API/ABI changes that happen during OpenSSL microreleases that break packages integrations AND that this will add a security delta (-backports doesn't receive Security Team support so if they change and patch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003903] Re: [BPO] openssl/3.0.5-2ubuntu2 from kinetic

2023-01-25 Thread Mark Pruett
Thomas and Marc, thanks for the guidance and time spent here. :) I'll look into the SRU process. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2003903 Title: [BPO] opens