> Also, according to listening tests, opus is known to be better than
vorbis in every tested scenario, see:
http://jmspeex.livejournal.com/13547.html
I can say from the experience of ABX testing classical music at low
bitrates, 32 kb/s to 64 kb/s, that there's basically no comparison
between AoTuV
I use Arch Linux now. Arch has libvorbis 1.3.4, libvorbis-aotuv b6.03
and opus 1.1.
Bye,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libvorbis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57797
Title:
include aoTuV patch
I think the best approach here is to discuss and do this upstream. Feel
free to do a petition or whatever. No known distribution add aotuv as an
added patch to libvorbis. If properly merged upstream every distribution
will then get aotuv in standard libvorbis.
Unless someone is really motivated on
Please do not discuss OPUS. Most hw players have no opus support, thus
it is not an option.
Also, we will not drop kino because cinallera is better.
Make existing software as good as possible, as long as it has its
purpose. Vorbis definitely has one.
Please merge the current patch sets.
--
You
Vorbis merged an old version of aotuv, latest aotuv is not in vorbis
however.
Also, according to listening tests, opus is known to be better than vorbis in
every tested scenario, see:
http://jmspeex.livejournal.com/13547.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
hdante, just a few comments/questions:
> 2) Xiph vorbis encoder merged AoTuV tunings
What version of the AoTuV tunings have been merged into the Xiph
encoder? The version of oggenc that ships with Ubuntu can't go down to
32 kb/s, which is a sign that it's using the old, unpatched reference
encode
6 matches
Mail list logo
